|
Who cares about the D750, Nikon just made an FX 20mm 1.8 lens 
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2014 15:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 15:45 |
|
|
Also I don't use my Nikon for video anymore, but my Blackmagic Cinema Cameras all have m43 to Nikon Speedboosters and a 20mm 1.8 would round out my current set of primes; got 24, 35, 50, and 85 already.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2014 21:02
|
|
|
I get why some people would want wide angle crop zooms, but is something wrong with the Tokina 11-16 or the Sigma 8-16?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
Moon Potato posted:There's no reason good superzooms can't be made, they're just too enormous and expensive to be of use for still photography unless you're rich and insane. Doesn't cover full frame 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2014 17:08
|
|
|
A modern, stabilized 70-200 is gonna blow the doors off the older 80-200, hell a newer f4 one is probably gonna be much sharper than an older 2.8.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2014 07:11
|
|
|
The AF-D 35-70 is pretty good and like $400ish?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
Or you can get the 28-85 AF-D with macro! I think I got one on KEH for $30 and it's good for a walkaround lens.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 03:38
|
|
|
Same with the D600/610. I don't know why they're suddenly losing their minds when the D800 had this ability like 2 years ago.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2014 18:26
|
|
|
800peepee51doodoo posted:Yeah, they don't seem to be all that interested in doing crop cameras any more. The D7100 exists and has a 24mp sensor that is almost 14 stops.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
Struggling with his credit card bill though, I'm sure.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
Canon sells $20,000 APS-C cinema cameras, I doubt those are going away.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
What is it about the colors on the A7s do you not like? Do you shoot in slog or just one of the normal profiles? I have the same experience with my Blackmagic cameras, but working in raw and grading in Resolve allows me to get great color. I'm thinking of adding an A7s to my video kit since it's got mad DR and I can use it as a backup photo body.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2014 01:39
|
|
|
?? I did a cleaning and it was fine afterwards.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2014 00:42
|
|
|
I thought news departments were firing their photographers and handing out high MP cell phone cameras to reporters anyways 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2014 07:28
|
|
|
I sent mine for service a couple months ago and it took 5 days total, including ship time and time to repair physical damage caused by a drop and to clean the sensor.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
Good plan? The D800 is a better camera in every which way except for size and weight, I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2014 18:49
|
|
|
Talk me out of renting a 135 DC next weekend for an event I'm shooting.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2014 00:37
|
|
|
The curve and exposure are the first thing I hit 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 03:23
|
|
|
I don't get why people are suddenly talking about this. The D800 and D600 have been available for like 2 years already.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2014 04:29
|
|
|
The mid-level full frame would be the D600/610.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2014 20:12
|
|
|
Everybody forgets about the Df  (For good reason)
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2014 20:20
|
|
|
Weird, I had mine done earlier this year and have taken something like 20k photos since - no excessive amount of dust. How long did you have yours before you sent it in? I had mine for 2 years before bothering to do a cleaning.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
If I recall, doing a cleaning before the first 10k shutter actuations or so could result in more dust buildup due to reasons that I can't remember right now, though you'd expect that this shouldn't be a problem after the shutter assembly has been replaced.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
Depends on your use case and style of video, it's hard recommend something without knowing your style and how you plan to put videos together.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2014 02:45
|
|
|
Lots of people use 4/3 for pro video.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2014 21:37
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:135f2dc Best portrait lens ever.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
Warranties might not apply for gray market products.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
Kenshin posted:Well, I assume I wouldn't have a warranty. Or you could get a used D800 now and have a great crop camera that can also be a high MP full frame.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
I was shooting Canon crop before the D800 came and the leap in tech over the mk3 was so dramatic I knew I had to switch. I just wish there was a decent 24-105 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 25, 2015 06:38
|
|
|
He probably means the AF gets stuck.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
On a modern Nikon (Sony) sensor, I don't think it even applies gain until you hit ISO1600. So really you can push it around in any direction at any point before then and you'd be fine as long as you were shooting in raw.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
The sensors in the newer full frames don't apply any gain until 1600 or so, so going up in that case is really just moving your exposure up and losing 2/3 stops of headroom in the highlights.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
Moon Potato posted:Have you tried doing curls, brah?
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
The Locator posted:I appreciate that good lenses are expensive, but for my purposes (I am not a professional by any stretch of the imagination) it's just far beyond the price I could consider paying. I do understand it's a professional lens and may be priced appropriately, but drat, for a hobby type user like myself, it's still expensive as hell! This bears repeating but photography is a terrible hobby that is a giant pit of burning money
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
VelociBacon posted:If you're doing this professionally in an event setting I would say the d750 is your only option because it's the only fx Nikon right now outside of the pro bodies that can absolutely save shots that have no business being saved. If you were doing only studio work I'd say get the d810. I don't think it makes sense to buy the older fx bodies if this is something you're doing professionally. The D600 is very cheap and basically performs the same
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
toggle posted:Except for the dodgy Nikon fixes it for free and it never becomes a problem again - I'm like 30k clicks post repair and it's good. Considering how cheap and good a D600 is, it's hard to pass it up for a D750 that costs a lot more.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
#MakeNikonGreatAgain
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
Maybe if it was like 10+ stops.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 15:45 |
|
|
nielsm posted:Is the D600 completely forgotten? I don't think it's missing any features the D700 has, but it does add higher resolution and video recording. If you get the sensor cleaned, it is a great camera that costs very little.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2017 22:22
|
|