|
ultimateforce posted:MY DSLR does this really bad when shooting video and it drives me crazy. shoot in raw snipe
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:03 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 14:32 |
|
DivX discs didn't go bad, read the article you posted.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:05 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:shoot in raw snipe I said video not stills. GOD!!!
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:07 |
|
Digital Video Express
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:25 |
|
Doc Block posted:DivX discs didn't go bad, read the article you posted. oops, ok it's this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexplay AKA EZ-D also SpetraDisc is another one mentioned in that article
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:40 |
|
someone doesnt read threads
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:50 |
|
Sniep posted:someone doesnt read threads i never read posts even this one
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:54 |
|
Cold on a Cob posted:i never read posts even this one apparently neither does peepsalot
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:55 |
|
ultimateforce posted:I said video not stills. LOL if you aren't shooting on a camera that can record video in RAW.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 18:59 |
|
ultimateforce posted:MY DSLR does this really bad when shooting video and it drives me crazy. in a way, more traditional artifacts/noise is much easier to watch, coz this looks really weird/creepy/uncanny
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 19:44 |
|
Doc Block posted:LOL if you aren't shooting on a camera that can record video in RAW. Wait, I didn't know that was an option. I think I have been caught in a trap here.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 19:52 |
|
CamH posted:give me an animated gif and a .wav sound track to go with it. suits my needs here u go http://gifsound.com/
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 19:54 |
|
do people still write basically code when they don't want to pay for a not-poo poo video editor
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 19:56 |
|
ultimateforce posted:Wait, I didn't know that was an option. on "digital cinema" cameras like the arri alexa and the red cameras? yes. on a DSLR? no.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 20:24 |
|
Still camera companies still don't know how to do video properly film at 11
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 20:33 |
|
canon does. the changes needed to make their DSLRs shoot raw would make the t2i cost like 9 grand tho.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 20:34 |
|
Yes but at least Nikon does non-retarded things like have uncompressed video output over HDMI basically what I'm trying to say here is just get a blackmagic camera if you're going to go shoot some raw vidz
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 20:50 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:cineform or prores so that premiere or fcp or whatever wont gag on the previews and timeline while you're scrubbing through them. anything else is for scrubs. be prepared for the prores transcoded files to take about 10x the space of the original files out of the camera, so your 5 gig project can quickly turn into a 50gig project. transcode with something that can take advantage of CUDA because gently caress waiting for even an i7 to do that poo poo by hand. lol what is this? 5 years ago? edit native in all three big NLEs or
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:16 |
|
yes i shot raw so i could create/edit proxies and make more work for myself.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:19 |
|
prores is still cool tho just wish it wasn't in a crappy container
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:19 |
|
pagancow posted:lol what is this? 5 years ago? edit native in all three big NLEs or yo good luck not having any of the big 3 not cough up a lung when you scrub through more than a minute or two of 1080p. that mercury hardware playback engine in premiere took care of a lot of that, but it still gets choppy on me every once in a while if im not using prores or cineform.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:27 |
pagancow posted:Starcraft 2 uses Divx (mpeg-4 license) to encode their videos because they aren't afraid to use some rams. Wait what I thought it just saved replay data which you need to capture in game to make video
|
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:28 |
|
got dat wmd posted:Wait what I thought it just saved replay data which you need to capture in game to make video cutscenes.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:49 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:yo good luck not having any of the big 3 not cough up a lung when you scrub through more than a minute or two of 1080p. disk i/o deficiency
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:49 |
|
pagancow posted:disk i/o deficiency on a solid state drive?
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 21:57 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:on a solid state drive? The adobe engineers told me that AVCHD and other non all-i frame codecs need more disk IO becuase it has to read ahead and create all the iframes you want to seek in the middle. I'm guessing its because your on OS X? They said that it was their secondary platform and they didn't put as much time into it. It's also possible that you have have enabled MPE on a card that isn't officially supported by adobe doing the text file hack, and you could get slower performance than software mode. pagancow fucked around with this message at 22:17 on Dec 31, 2012 |
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:07 |
|
adobe treating non-windows platforms as second-class citizens? you don't say!!! edti: and yeah, if you're gonna use a mac for creative stuff, use a mac with an nvidia GPU so you can take advantage of all the CUDA-enabled stuff, since apparently OpenCL is slower and badly supported on windows so not as many apps support it. Doc Block fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Dec 31, 2012 |
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:15 |
|
Doc Block posted:adobe treating non-windows platforms as second-class citizens? you don't say!!! lol look at the epic card list you get to choose from for suported cuda cards in 10.8.2 GeForce 200 series: GTX 285 for MAC GeForce 100 series: GT 120 GeForce 8 series: 8800 GT Quadro series: 4000 for Mac Quadro FX series: FX 5600, FX 4800 for MAC only 3 of those cards will give you a framerate boost with MPE with frame sizes over 1920x1080
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:19 |
|
pagancow posted:The adobe engineers told me that AVCHD and other non all-i frame codecs need more disk IO becuase it has to read ahead and create all the iframes you want to seek in the middle. i do premiere on a windows box precisely becasue adobe hates apple now. i also have a GTS450 fermi whatever, which makes it render HD video faster than realtime, so I dont think its the card. either way, it only stutters erry once ina while, so its nbd.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:36 |
|
it works with other cards too, my gtx 660 ti works fine with cuda
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:39 |
|
also lol re: DIVXquote:There was a movement on the Internet, particularly in home theater forums, against DIVX. The DIVX catalog of titles were released primarily in pan and scan format with limited special features, usually only a trailer. egh gently caress it lets just give them a trailer for the film they're about to watch
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:40 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:i do premiere on a windows box precisely becasue adobe hates apple now. i also have a GTS450 fermi whatever, which makes it render HD video faster than realtime, so I dont think its the card. either way, it only stutters erry once ina while, so its nbd. just fyi adobe has always been this way re: apple.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:46 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:i do premiere on a windows box precisely becasue adobe hates apple now. i also have a GTS450 fermi whatever, which makes it render HD video faster than realtime, so I dont think its the card. either way, it only stutters erry once ina while, so its nbd. a 450 is too slow for 1920x1080 video. Also they didn't make those cards with 2gb of ram. Try turning off MPE and you might find that it will be faster.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 22:56 |
|
Top 10 MKVs this year: lol if "the scene" really wanted an obscure format that could hold anything they should just use MXF. At least you can do something with MXF other than play it back in terrible traffic cone player.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 23:11 |
Nobody wants an obscure container what are you talking about. Scenes killed everything but x264 in mp4 for a reason
|
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 23:33 |
|
ultimateforce posted:MY DSLR does this really bad when shooting video and it drives me crazy. If you have a good camera (canon), you can install magic lantern and adjust bitrate and it owns.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2013 00:05 |
|
divx the gently caress was that crap
|
# ? Jan 1, 2013 00:51 |
|
oh someone already said divx realplayer format
|
# ? Jan 1, 2013 00:53 |
|
someone please help my video codec is acting weird canät see anything https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qchPLaiKocI
|
# ? Jan 1, 2013 01:24 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 14:32 |
|
Daala is the current working name of a next generation video codec— to be renamed once someone insists on something better. So far the best proposed alternative is PatentCake. man these s can't pick a name that doesnt make them sound like p. terrible people
|
# ? Jan 1, 2013 03:17 |