|
tell me about: truemotion cinepak and why they're bad in the context of the time they were out
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2013 07:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 04:05 |
|
i remember converting things to Smacker format video edit them into vidya games. made by the same company as Bink, but earlier, and it supported only 256 colors + transparency but you could have a completely different palette of colors on each frame.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2013 17:03 |
|
Wheany posted:so, an animated gif? an animated gif except with actual inter-frame compression and sound support
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2013 21:29 |
|
pagancow posted:i love h.264 becuase quality is high, for a 4:2:0 medium what does my xbox 360 use for h.264. because thats how i watch most h.264 content mostly
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2013 20:14 |
|
THC posted:my display supports 24hz but my movies looked jerky as gently caress when I tried them in that mode. what gives movies are inherently jerky as gently caress because they're 24 fps. hth
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2013 22:18 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQokTc8D0P8 heres a sweet example of antishake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6SgP9ngSFU&t=315s
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2013 23:04 |
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:was toy story 3 converted? that seems stupid as hell but i wonder since it didnt work for poo poo. i know alice was converted and it was awful i think they just rendered Toy Story 3 twice, once for 2d and once for 3d
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2013 18:09 |
|
ahmeni posted:because the Apple TV is a sleeper product that not many people want until apple does something good with it protip: they never will
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2013 05:17 |
|
ahmeni posted:does it even have apps?? or is it just preloaded with Netflix or something the apple tv: 1) plays (some of) your content from itunes 2) has support for a few online streaming services for video and music here's a list of the services iTunes Store (Content must be streamed live or downloaded via iTunes onto a device with storage capability [personal computer, iPhone, iPad, etc.]) Flickr and iCloud photo slide shows Netflix Hulu Plus YouTube and Vimeo Rotten Tomatoes reviews can be browsed for rented/purchased content NBA TV and MLB.tv allow access to league scores, statistics, and their accompanying subscription services. so i think in australia you'd just get itunes store, flickr and icloud slide shows, youtube and vimeo.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2013 06:33 |
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:So it's a glorified TV tuner? well it cant actually let you watch live tv off an antenna or cable box
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2013 07:38 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:appletv youtube is useless lol last time i used an apple tv it still handled videos with ads. nice to know they made it worse
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 03:04 |
|
im immune to color banding affecting my enjoyment of things because i started pirating videos on computers with a 256 color display so it was inevitable
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 04:29 |
|
pagancow posted:
16 and 24 bit color videos being played back on a 256 color screen
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 04:37 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:What's color banding
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 04:38 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:hey are there any tv providers that dont compress the poo poo out of everything and turn it into macroblock hell? i just dumped uverse and have just been watching ota tv and apple tv lately, and holy poo poo are both waaaaaaaayyyyyyyy better than uverses blocky lovely mess. any fast motion was rendered unwatchable mess because of the compression. my comcast system displays them just fine, but i've been to other regions and watched comcast there and it was all compressed?? though our local comcast systems have completely removed all analog signals from the distribution, so I think they have a lot more bandwidth available to send out hd channels than places that still have analog channels available
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 17:31 |
|
Shaggar posted:I think u mean standard def digital, not analog. analog is the channels your 20 year old tv can get plugged directly into the cable. I don't think many providers have much more than 60 analog channels. each of those channels is gigantic and static so they block off a huge amount of bandwidth on the coax. by switching everyone to digital they free up that space for switched digital. yeah pretty much. one standard analog cable channel's space could provide 2 or 3 high quality 720p or 1080i digital channels, or up to 8 SD resolution digital channels.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 18:15 |
|
Cold on a Cob posted:is there still analog cable in canada? because ota is 100% digital now i think yes. lots of cable systems simply haven't carried out the conversions
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 18:29 |
|
Shaggar posted:eventually cable cos will get to a point where they have a handful of holdouts who wont let them convert and the cable cos will just drop them. yeah thats what they did here. except instead of drop people they issued the absolute most basic digital cable box you can imagine for free to anyone with an analog only subscription and told them they could have a free install job from comcast, install the free device themselves, or just not ever watch cable again. the cable box is like the size of an apple tv 3 and all it has on the remote is power, change channel and volume
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 18:35 |
|
Shaggar posted:they give those to the ones that let them in to install them. theres a whole other category of olds who refuse to let them change anything. it turns out that when you inform them that "no really, you aren't getting anymore of your cable if you don't let us install this, because the signal is shutting off on may 1st" they change their minds p quick.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 18:42 |
|
pagancow posted:When they announced ATSC standards for OTA broadcasts I was like "really? thats it?" the ATSC standards are 18 years old
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 20:05 |
|
ahmeni posted:it's weird here in aus cable is a premium tier service and just about everybody else watches poo poo OTA for free thats pretty much how it is in every country that had like only 2 channels up until the late 80s. like in the us and canada cable systems started to get subscription over tv services by the mid 70s, and later satellite did too. but in australia there wasn't any regular broadcast tv at all until 1956 and they didn't get more than 5 channels nationwide til the 90s iirc
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 20:36 |
|
50p? grossss
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 22:43 |
|
everything should be at least 60 imo
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 22:50 |
|
longview posted:I seriously doubt a normal person can tell the difference between a 50 Hz and a 60 Hz signal on an LCD. more is better
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2013 23:23 |
|
pagancow posted:60P is best becuase 24P pulldown in it is p hard to see yeah 3:2 has problems and all but its better than having hosed up pitch and such
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2013 01:37 |
|
pagancow posted:once you have seen the 3:2 pulldown, you cannot unsee it i can totally see 3:2 pulldown but it doesn't bother me. 24 fps stuff sped up to fit into an even multiple of 50 though? that poo poo is grating
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2013 04:22 |
|
gonna be cool when everyone forgets about vine in 8 months. like every other vaguely social thing that releases solely on ios and the web
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2013 22:35 |
|
indeed, stupid flash in the pan pseudo-social-network things should be kept away from normal people's phones. ps if you still don't understand that android is the phone os for normal people then you're legally retarded.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2013 02:15 |
|
what was that one called like 2 years ago where the premise was itd monitor the microphone for similar sounds so you could share pictures only with people who were close by
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2013 02:42 |
|
oh here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/23/color-social-network-bill-nguyen_n_839865.html
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2013 02:46 |
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:now that i get vine, im still not sure if it will stick around for long. it is like twitter for videos, but mashing out 140 characters is easy, vine requires effort, and we all know how the twitter world likes effort p much theres a reason video calls are dead and texts reign supreme after all
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2013 16:25 |
|
duTrieux. posted:how the gently caress is this thread still on topic because video codecs is piece of poo poo
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2013 06:21 |
|
Wheany posted:welp, webm infringes h.264 patents after all: webm sucks because nothing hardware accelerates it
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2013 16:53 |
|
Wheany posted:well that and also it is worse in every way compared to the one true codec and now we have learned that it's not even free. yeah but if it had been hardware accelerated id be willing to just deal with that. instead its also slower and less compatible, on top of looking kind of rear end and not being as good on storage space
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2013 17:33 |
|
acceleration is coming but it isnt on anything now, and we were supposed to have started getting vp8 hardware acceleration last year
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2013 23:29 |
|
pagancow posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc#Blu-ray_3D lisa "left-eye" encodez
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2013 16:12 |
|
pagancow posted:so i just tried to play a level 4.1 avc compliant .mp4 file on a late 2008 macbook pro and it kept dropping out when the bitrate spiked over 50mbps. is this because microsoft licensed a better built in decoder or what
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2013 20:20 |
|
pagancow posted:who am i kidding, microsoft actually tests stuff to the spec instead of saying "yep our 5mbps itunes videos work" well yeah, some of their business actually depends on it
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2013 20:30 |
|
pagancow posted:iOS is surprisingly good at video playback considering how terrible Quicktime and OS X is. whats the 30 hz psf mean
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2013 21:10 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 04:05 |
|
Wheany posted:can we talk about webp? because it seems webp is pretty ownage. it supports lossless and lossy compression, with alpha, and animation. and it seems to do each better than jpeg, png and gif. and google might be able to use their high browser market share to actually give the format some chance of making it. 20% share isnt enough to push adoption
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2013 21:57 |