|
Though perhaps not as knowledgeable as some of the other posters in this thread, I recently finished writing my undergrad thesis about recently discovered relics from the reign of King Offa, and know a decent amount about Anglo-Saxon topics. If you guys have any questions about that period and place, I'd be happy to answer them.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2013 08:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 22:03 |
|
I'm fairly certain a teardrop shield would be held with the teardrop pointing slightly backwards, not straight down towards the ground. This makes it similar in style to a round shield, with the addition of a bit extra to protect your thigh/leg. This is a rough approximation from what I have gathered, people more knowledgeable on military history might be able to explain it better.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2013 19:45 |
|
PittTheElder posted:It wonder if it could be that the top half (where your arm is attached and you presumably have the most control) is the 'business end' as it were, and making the bottom taper off like that would still offer some protection that a large oval shield would, while being considerably lighter. That's pretty much what I was trying to say. And yeah, they do look super bad rear end.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2013 20:39 |
|
the runs formula posted:The shield design makes perfect sense though. The knight/fighter isn't fighting in an isosceles style stance. I'm aware of all this. I was saying a teardrop shape was a pretty good design, able to be used in the same style as a round shield, but with extra size/protection for use on horseback.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2013 18:33 |