Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Terrific thread! Thanks so much for making it!

The resurrection of Richard III's skeleton has brought up the old arguments between the Ricardists and the Tudor fans over the mystery of The Princes in the Tower. I'd love to hear the OP's and other historians' personal theories about what happened to the princes.

As Ricardists have pointed out, if Richard *had* killed the princes (or had them killed at his command), why didn't Henry VII make hay of it once he became king? What about Philippa Gregory's fictionalized theory, that Buckingham had them killed at Margaret Beaufort's behest and unknown to Richard? And was it ever determined whether Perkin Warbeck was indeed one of the princes? (Anne Easter Smith makes the case in one of her novels that Warbeck was in fact the Duke of Clarence's out-of-wedlock child, raised by his sister, Margaret of Burgundy.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread