|
Farecoal posted:I don't get it From about 1805 onward the United States claimed what is today British Columbia while the British claimed modern day Washington. It was a hotly debated issue between the United States and United Kingdom, who shared joint occupancy of the territory with the Americans. For Americans, it was an opportunity to expand the United States while maintaining the delicate balance between the slave and free states. For the British, Vancouver was the nexus of fur trade. America and Britain nearly went to war in 1845 after President Polk adopted annexation of the entire territory to his platform. It is still a popular Point of Diversion in alternate history. I am rather surprised by the map's suggestion that Russia owns everything west of the Rocky Mountains. Abel Wingnut posted:Is Turkey part of China there? Turkey and China are suppose to be demilitarized minor states. The Soviets had a few crazy maps of their own. Let me see if I can find one. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 00:59 on Feb 3, 2013 |
# ¿ Feb 3, 2013 00:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 10:05 |
|
The terrifying world of 2053. I just want to point out that the capital of the Greater United States appears to be Kingston and Bangladesh appears to have sunk beneath the waves.
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2013 01:06 |
|
Young Freud posted:Where is this from, besides Russia? It is from a Mikhail Yuryev's book, The Third Empire. In it he predicts that a Third Russian Empire, the first two being Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union, will arise by 2015. Following this, Russia will reclaim its Baltic territories and defeat the United States in the ensuing thermonuclear war. By 2025 Russia will own most of Europe, destroy the Vatican and force the Pope into hiding in Latin America. Mikhail Yuryev is the former chairman of Russia's Council on Economy and Entrepreneurship and has served as Deputy Speaker of the Duma. He is an ultranationalist who believes Russia must reclaim its former glory, reassert its status as an Orthodox nation, and destroy all those who seek to oppose Russian interests. He left government a while back but still has friends within the Duma and Putin's Cabinet. quote:“Russia is a great state and must remain as such. This means that our existence as Russians inside Russia, not as nationals of a different country living in this country, however affluent and free it may be, is a value of the highest order.”
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2013 17:04 |
|
Freudian posted:They're labelled Catholic...? Unless I am misreading the map, they are labelled "Tribal and Christian".
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2013 18:56 |
|
Even though the United States failed to purchase Greenland from Denmark in the 1940s, America has done a lot of military operations in the region. It is really fascinating. My absolute favorite is Operation Iceworm, known better as Camp Century. It was a secret experimental "city of ice" built by the Army Corps of Engineer housing a nuclear reactor and bunkers. It was inhabited from 1960 to 1966 by a few hundred people. The Boy Scouts provided several members to serve as "Junior Scientific Aides".
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2013 03:11 |
|
Farecoal posted:You're going to hate this: I was on the island of Saint Martin during William and Kate's wedding. I spent lunch on the Dutch side, in a Chinese restaurant, decorated with British flags with a few French friends. It was quite the experience.
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2013 04:22 |
|
Amused to Death posted:I've never been so happy to apparently be totally oppressed. One of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's biggest issues was the liberum veto which allowed any member of the 150 member Congress to veto a piece of legislation or annul any previously passed pieces of legislation. Austria and Russia were able to paralyze the nation by bribing a handful of nobles and asking them to veto everything. It was removed in 1791, far too late for Poland-Lithuania to be saved.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2013 22:43 |
|
Ardennes posted:The liberum veto is brought up a lot up not what established it, was that Poland-Lithuania's constitution was based around protecting a very large petty nobility from a very weak elected monarchy. However, while you were part of the nobility you had rights, if you were a peasant you might as well be living in Russia as far as the rights you got. Yes. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth wasn't as progressive as some make it out to be. It was a pretty depressing place to be for the average person. They did make some eventual reforms, but by that time it was because the nobility realized, "Oh poo poo. We might actually die" more than anything else.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2013 23:11 |
|
If I remember correctly, that map was published in a German satirical magazine in response to anti-German sentiment in Germany. For an actual plan to divide up Germany there is always the Morgenthau Plan. Unfortunately, Wikipedia only has maps that look like they were made in MS Paint and are difficult to read. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Apr 1, 2013 |
# ¿ Apr 1, 2013 19:13 |
|
Muscle Tracer posted:What's the context of this map? Was this part of a historical plan, or is it just anti-German dreaming or what? If I remember correctly, that map was published in a German satirical magazine in response to anti-German sentiment in Germany.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2013 22:22 |
|
In 1954 Leopold Kohr, Austrian political scientist and self described philosophical anarchist, published The Breakup of Nations. The book protested what he called the "cult of bigness". There is a general desire for expansion and Kohr argued that all the world's problems could be traced back to one power becoming too powerful. The division of the United States was perfect as no one state was large enough to dominate the others or cause much harm. To illustrate his ideas, he drew an idealized version of Europe based strongly on US borders. This, in his mind, was what Europe should strive for: He realized, however, that dividing Europe into rectangular states would clash with the ‘tribal’ makeup of the continent’s culturally diverse peoples. He proposed the following borders:
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2013 23:32 |
|
Both during Texas' admittance to the Union and after the Civil War, there were numerous proposals to divide Texas. Although most these suggestions were not taken seriously, the following proposals were the most popular: This was proposed during the Texan Constitutional Convention of 1866. Eastern Texas was densely populated compared to its western counterpart. The suggestion to divide the state was meant to ensure the interests of Eastern settlers who had little in common, culturally, economically and politically, with their rural counterparts. It also would have sold the largely empty basin and range region to the United States. This proposal was rejected and countered with the suggestion below. At the same Constitutional Convention, Elisha Pease proposed that a much larger chunk of western Texas be sold to the US, but the rest of Texas stay together. The proposal received some mild support and was sent to committee. However, the committee degenerated into fights and when the delegates tried to divide Texas into North, East, South, and West Texas. Further attempts to break the territory down led to the committee's disintegration. In 1869, Radical Republicans proposed breaking Texas down into two states: Texas and Lincoln. Southern Texas was perceived as far more Unionist and was an attractive destination for northern settlers after the Civil War. This suggestion died in committee. In 1870, another proposal was made for parts of Texas to be made territories, to be admitted as States according to Reconstruction plans. The plan reached the House floor but was voted down. However, the plan saw a brief resurgence in popularity in 1914 in a dispute over utilities. West Texas was constantly neglected for state-level government attention during the early part of the 1900s and its influence minimized because of gerrymandering. With the revival of the 1870 plan, West Texan politicians appeared with a different suggestion. It was popularly received by West Texan residents and received significant news coverage. However, state lawmakers were able to negotiate a settlement and the issue died around 1915. It was the last serious proposal to divide Texas.
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2013 15:34 |
|
Lycus posted:Nearly all of Christian Europe being "enlightened" except for the Italian Peninsula, which is just "civilized", is curious. Woodbridge was an American educator and educator. His maps were based upon personal travels and interviews with the people there. From 1820 to 1821 he lived in Italy and spent significant time comparing Italian culture to his American experiences. For an American protestant and supporter of democratic government, the amount of control the Papacy exerted over the peninsula would have shocked him. Nearly half of all territory in the Kingdom of Two Sicilies were untaxable Church lands. The Vatican Banks supported projects in Tuscany and Modena. The Index of Banned Books was a powerful list that could kill an author's reputation. It would have been extremely difficult for an American to comprehend. His research probably was not helped by a series of widely publicized writings on the Papal State in France. There's a famous quote about the Papacy being "more interested in polishing the statues of the Saints than in repairing potholes in the streets". The situation in the Papal States was improved under Pius IX, but the Secretary of State's assassination and the Pope's complete political reversal following the Revolutions of 1848 mitigated the effect. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Apr 15, 2013 |
# ¿ Apr 15, 2013 03:11 |
|
BOWLES'S EUROPEAN GEOGRAPHICAL AMUSEMENT (or a Game of Geoography) Designed 1795. quote:DIRECTIONS for PLAYING QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 14:01 on Apr 21, 2013 |
# ¿ Apr 21, 2013 13:57 |
|
Kurtofan posted:43. GENOA, capital of the republic of that name; surnamed the proud, from its grand buildings; here the traveler must stay four turns, and then go back to Rouen, 3. On account of the cruelty of the Genoese to the Corsicians. The glowing compliments toward Corsica might be because the island's government petitioned England for annexation about a year after the map was made.
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2013 17:35 |
|
In that vein, throughout the 1870s King Victor Emmanuel II offered Pope Pius Lateran City as a consolation prize for losing Rome. The Pope repeatedly reject the offer because he saw himself as the sole legitimate ruler of Rome. Had Pius accepted the offer, however, Vatican City would be nearly twice its current size.
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2013 12:33 |
|
Purno posted:On the same topic, I made this: Iraq, Afghanistan and Sudan have quotas that force the government to allow women into parliament. In Afghanistan, at least sixty-eight members of the lower house must be women. In Iraq and Sudan, at least a quarter of parliament must be female. There are similar quotas for ethnic and religious minorities.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2013 12:13 |
|
The Narrator posted:What's the context of this ad? I can only assume it's an ad for Mexican audiences, but I'm still unsure what it's meant to be insinuating? That if the Mexicans had drunk Absolut, Manifest Destiny wouldn't have worked and the Mexican concession wouldn't have happened? For a while Absolut Vodka ran an ad campaign depicting perfect worlds. The advertisement above was used in Mexico until it made its way north. A few Americans became very annoyed by the implication that the US never should have conquered California and Absolut had to release an apology statement a few days later.
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2013 03:43 |
|
Kainser posted:From Pole to shining Pole This is a really annoying cliche in alternate history. Decades of Darkness
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2013 02:36 |
|
Kainser posted:That was actually exactly what I was thinking of, the one single good piece of alternate history. The problem with most alternate history is that the writers are more focused on making the world as different as possible rather than writing a realistic world or making useful commentary on modern events. The easiest way to get attention is by changing borders so alternate history is often associated with maps. The alternatehistory.com community is particularly bad in this regard. The easiest way to get yourself noticed is be moderately talented in Photoshop. You could be copying literal encyclopedia entries but as long as you have regular illustrations, people will follow you. I do have a few favorite pieces of internet alternate history, though: Fear, Loathing and Gumbo on the Campaign Trail '72: Louisiana Governor John Julian McKeithen decides to stand for the Democratic nomination for the 1972 Election. McGovern becomes furious about being overlooked and decides to run as an independent under a 'Peace' platform. The result is an electoral college split and the House of Representatives is forced to choose the President. Sprio Agnew does beautiful, wonderful things. A World of Laughter, A World of Tears Eisenhower drops from the 1952 Republican Primary after a minor heart attack. The incident does not threaten his life but forces Eisenhower to come to terms with his health. He drops from the race and the GOP is thrown into turmoil. Hoping to throw the Democrats off-guard, the Republicans nominate Walt Disney who proceeds to win by a large margin. His term goes as well as you might expect. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 22:30 on Jun 30, 2013 |
# ¿ Jun 30, 2013 22:10 |
|
As you command:
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2013 01:37 |
|
Social Mobility in the United States - Study conducted by Harvard University and California Berkeley http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/ quote:Enabling children to rise out of poverty is a primary goal of policies such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), the Child Tax Credit, and other tax expenditures. Building on our previous research on the EITC, we study the impact of tax expenditures on intergenerational mobility. We find substantial variation in the economic outcomes of children from poor families across areas of the United States. These differences are modestly correlated with variation in tax expenditure policies across areas, but much variation in children's success across areas remains to be explained. EDIT: Son of a bitch.
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2013 21:28 |
|
Peanut President posted:I'm wondering in what part of america that there are people mad about the Canal Zone? There is a non-marginal portion of the country that thinks giving up the Panama Canal Zone was a mistake and made the United States look weak to the world community. My father believed that the Torrijos–Carter Treaties were some of the worst mistakes Carter made during his administration. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 21:06 on Sep 8, 2013 |
# ¿ Sep 8, 2013 21:03 |
|
DrSunshine posted:Fantastical Alt-history maps okay? If so, let me present Greater California. I think this map is from Union and Liberty at alternatehistory.com. The timeline is currently in the middle of its World War I parallel.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2013 13:24 |
|
DerLeo posted:What in hell happened to Europe I haven't read the timeline in a while, but from what I remember the point of divergence is Jackson being assassinated by Richard Lawrence. If I remember correctly, Austria is invaded simultaneously by Prussia and Italy over minor land holdings. France jumps in to assert its hegemony and the Hapsburg rule completely collapses. The powers of Europe are left holding a bag of poo poo and try to settle various land disputes in a Conference of Europe. (It fails.) Better map of North America in the timeline: The World in a New Century, Section II: Ibero North America posted:California: EDIT: Peanut President posted:Congo Territory? I guess that's a replacement for Liberia? Essentially. I think they buy it off the Belgians.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2013 13:50 |
|
Oh God, those borders.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2013 16:43 |
|
Nevermind. I am stupid.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2013 01:10 |
|
Here is a House Map for last night's vote to reopen the US government and avoid a default.
|
# ¿ Oct 17, 2013 15:04 |
|
I like how the state of Ohio does not actually contain the Ohio River.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2013 23:08 |
|
Is there a reason why Google has street view for all of Switzerland, except for Zurich?
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2013 02:07 |
|
Skeleton Jelly posted:What are you talking about? Zürich is covered and it's clearly to the north of that empty blob. The areas not covered in Switzerland are not covered because there's no point in covering bumfuck nowhere mountain regions. It looks like I misread the map. Sorry.
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2013 03:13 |
|
DarkCrawler posted:So...the Catholic Church is pretty racist, apparently. I don't think there is malice behind the discrepancy. Europe's over representation is more symptomatic of the Church's difficulty to change. In 1913, over 70% of the world's Catholic population lived in Europe. There is also over 1000 years of history behind certain offices. Berlin may not currently have a large Catholic population but they have always had a cardinal-elector so it is expected that when the current Cardinal dies, a new one will be appointed. These regions would be extremely offended if they were ignored in favor of a younger diocese. Pope John Paul II and Benedict XVI did try to make the number of Cardinals a little more representative of the Church population. I expect Francis to do the same.
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2013 17:08 |
|
The concept of dividing Texas originated in the Joint Resolution for Annexing Texas to the United States, signed in 1 March 1845. Under Article II, Texas may be divided into "new States of convenient size not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas and having sufficient population, may, hereafter by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the Federal Constitution." The provision was included to calm fears that Texas would undo the fragile Missouri Compromise. If either the Free and Slave states threatened to overpower the other, Texas could always be divided until balance was reached again. Article IV Section 3 of The United States Constitution expressly prohibits Texas, or any other state, from dividing up and forming smaller states without Congressional approval. Modern Texas divisionists argue that Congress already granted Texas approval by ratifying the Texas Annexation Treaty and that the state would not need to petition Congress if it wanted to divide itself in the future. As unlikely as it is that Texas would divide itself, it is an interesting possibility to imagine. In addition to the maps above, there were a few pre-21st century proposals. QuoProQuid posted:Both during Texas' admittance to the Union and after the Civil War there were numerous proposals to divide Texas. Although most these suggestions were not taken seriously, the following proposals were the most popular: QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 17:01 on Dec 21, 2013 |
# ¿ Dec 21, 2013 16:59 |
|
Nessus posted:Is this... Greater Ohio? Not even close. The Framers of the 1802 Ohio Constitution thought that Congress was granting them the Detroit River as well as exclusive access to Lake Erie. It was one of the many issues that complicated Michigan's admission to the Union and caused the Toledo War. Greater Ohio would probably look something like: QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 21:10 on May 3, 2014 |
# ¿ May 3, 2014 21:08 |
|
Ofaloaf posted:My stomach actually churned at the sight of that map. I feel ill. I just grabbed the first map I saw on Google and edited accordingly. Thought it was just a generic map of the Great Lakes region. The Enabling Act of 1802 drew Ohio's border at the southern most point of Lake Michigan, which was thought at the time to be parallel with Lake St. Clare. When the error was discovered, the Ohio government tried to revise their borders to encompass the Maumee River Watershed, but the matter died in committee. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 01:22 on May 4, 2014 |
# ¿ May 4, 2014 01:16 |
|
Pakled posted:
Whereas some Protestants like to criticize Catholicism for worshiping the Popes and Saints, some Catholics accuse protestant groups of Biblical idolatry. Scripture is not ultimate reality but a sign that points to ultimate reality. It is not infallible and should not be studied at the exclusion of other aspects of the faith, like Tradition. By elevating the Bible to an unquestionable status, Protestants are unintentionally replacing God with the Bible. There are some Catholic scholars that go further by saying that the Bible is not even necessary to be Christian. The early Christian communities obviously had no scripture. Until the printing press the Bible was not accessible to anyone except the most educated and the most wealthy so Christian communities relied on oral tradition to keep the faith. Provinces and diocese of the Catholic Church in the United States. Each colour represents an ecclesiastic province, each shape is a diocese. Diocese designated by the Church to be "Mission Diocese" requiring financial or institutional aid. These are generally communities where there is severe economic hardship or limited institutional presence (i.e. there are no ordained leaders, Catholic schools or religious buildings). EDIT: Just noticed how the diocese borders for Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia line up with that ancient shoreline that appears so frequently on political maps. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 16:01 on Jun 10, 2014 |
# ¿ Jun 10, 2014 15:57 |
|
I went to the Catholic Extension website to double check. Here's how a "Mission Diocese" is defined in the institution's own words:FAQ and Policies posted:A mission diocese is a place where the Catholic Church is emerging, and even thriving, but the financial resources are scarce. A mission diocese is often limited in terms of infrastructure, Catholic educational institutions, professional opportunities, and philanthropic opportunities. So some areas are designated as mission communities just because they are extremely rural. I was hoping there would be a specific breakdown on why certain areas were selected but it doesn't look like they publish that information. My grandparents used to have a calendar with information on the Mission Diocese and it only ever discussed economic hardship or limited institutional presence as factors determining which areas were chosen.
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2014 18:38 |
|
The best U.S. flag is Ohio: The best Coat of Arms is from Zheleznogorsk, Russia: Here's a 1984 proposed redesign of Washington D.C. by Leon Krier. The plan would have involved flooding the National Mall as well as several Washington's major roads to turn it into an American Venice. QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 23:54 on Jun 10, 2014 |
# ¿ Jun 10, 2014 23:47 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Does the Swiss Guard have a band? Yes, the Swiss Guard does have a band. They hold a concert every Christmas and released an album in 2012.
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2014 13:10 |
|
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 10:05 |
|
DrSunshine posted:What is a "good" country, then? Is there a single country in the world that passes the D&D test for Goodness? As your question stands now, the only country that would fit Debate and Discussion's standards is probably the Most Serene Republic of San Marino. It carried out its last execution in 1468 and abolished the death penalty in 1848. Since establishment, it has only ever used its military in self-defense. Although a tax haven, San Marino has one of the most transparent banking systems among the microstates. The rapid turnover rate for leaders makes political corruption almost non-existent. At worst, you could criticize it for having no formal asylum policy. If you want to discuss whether any bigger countries can be "good," you will need to define your question a little better. Are we talking good in context of citizens, the world community, the environment? Domestic? International? Macro-level? Micro? Is good defined in relation to other states? Back to maps: Here's a cartogram of the world. Let's all laugh at Russia.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 23:13 |