|
nielsm posted:I think you should be able to open the camera in a dark room, remove both spools from the camera and wind it back up on the source one.
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2013 22:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 21:53 |
|
|
nielsm posted:Isn't it risky to load 120 film from the wrong end? Since only the starting end is fastened to the backing paper, when you run it backwards you risk the film itself not following the paper and jamming. This could be especially bad on cameras that don't have a flat film path, such as Hasselblad backs.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2013 23:07
|
|
|
67mm
|
|
#
¿
Jun 25, 2013 23:06
|
|
|
Photography Calculator At the bottom is a calculator for finding lens equivalence. An 80mm f2 on a 645 is about equivalent to a 46mm f1.2 on a FF. So yes, you could reproduce it, but it gets harder to do for the larger formats. For example, a 105mm f5.6 (a common 4x5 lens) is similar to a 28mm f1.5, and you aren't going to find many wide lenses that are that fast on a full frame.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2013 02:00
|
|
|
Yup, the film comes on a spool. As you shoot it, it winds onto the take up spool. When you're done the original spool will be empty. You send the film in with the take up spool, and move the old spool which becomes the new take up. You might want to look up a video of loading your camera as it's not quite as straight forward as 35mm (though it's still very easy). There is a specific orientation (because of the paper backing) which might not be obvious, and there is a starting mark for how much to prewind the film.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2015 21:23
|
|