|
Cactrot posted:Swiss army dwarf It's worse than it looks because your opponent can pay 0 to not take damage for as long as he's out. "Your opponents can't lose life. 1: target creature gets +6/-6" for R would still be pretty bonkers though.
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2013 20:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 22:52 |
|
|
Vomik posted:It doesn't say if you pay it you prevent the damage. Just that if you don't pay it you can do something to artifacts. It's phrased as a replacement effect--doing the stuff with artifacts replaces the damage. Of course, the ability doesn't actually function as written, because replacement effects are static abilities, wich never go on the stack, and it targets, meaning it must go on the stack, so that's just my best guess at what it's "supposed" to do.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
A much more reasonable ability would be "Sacrifice a creature. If you do, draw a card." That lets her + no matter what, which is something you should be able to do.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2013 07:22
|
|
|
That card should almost certainly tap when you add counters, no matter where you put the mana costs.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2014 12:43
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Creature - Faerie Wizard (1/1, blue) Yes.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2014 23:56
|
|
|
SEX HAVER 40000 posted:I just used this for the first time and the very first card it gives me is this: Draw 60 for 5 is worse than draw 3 for 1.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 22:52 |
|
|
I doubt they'd actually use that exact text because it's super confusing as soon as you approach edge cases and the entirety of every judge's time every tournament would be answering questions about that card.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2016 23:39
|
|