|
i just finished reading this thread after starting it like three months ago. my favourite character was "Luigi Thirty"
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 19:28 |
|
|
hackbunny posted:that's nice. never used c99 much outside of the obvious little things like declare variables anywhere, single-line comments, etc. tell no one, but I even used a VLA once! compound literals are excellent
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
Maluco Marinero posted:There are certain html elements that aren't allowed to wrap, like <a>'s around <a>'s, the behaviour of which is I think is unspecified in response to malformed HTML. Same deal goes with certain <table> constructs. ime this is specified in excruciating detail with test cases already written for you, so if you've genuinely found some unspecified case that's prolly a bug in the spec. doesn't mean browsers all do the same/correct thing
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
eschaton posted:that's because its creators were once smart but dropped out of the industry in the late 1970s and don't believe anything done since has any worth but I thought everything good in computer science was first done in the '60s and only now starting to trickle down to common langs checkmate????
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
HoboMan posted:does anyone know of a thing that will check my HTML in a strict way? i can't find anything obviously wrong with it, but it's a huge file. https://html5.validator.nu/
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2016 21:34
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:guess you've never used ojective c idgi
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2016 05:12
|
|
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i'm just saying that in my many years of programming i've never had to parse a uri that wasn't a url now igi
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
all you c# boosters should be legally required to say how bad nuget is anytime you bring up something good. it's somehow worse than cocoapods!
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 13:06
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:cocoapods was built by people with a fairly solid grasp of dependency management, but so little understanding of build systems that they didn't even realize that they were actually building a build system that happened to be able to fetch dependencies until it was far too late you mean in the sense that nuget distributes binaries while cocoapods distributes source? I guess that makes sense, and explains a few things while I'm pissing on dependency managers, does pip not actually resolve dependencies??? that's helpful
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
GameCube posted:pip usually installs whatever packages my package needs. or are you talking about something besides that indeed I am
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:rust's cargo is basically the cocoapods approach done right: the build system and dependency manager are fully integrated so that if you so desire you can build your project and all of its dependencies from source in one shot, but critically they actually know how build systems work, and are able to design everything from scratch to work together well glancing over the guide in the docs, cargo looks well done. I imagine the swift package manager owes a lot to cargo (or the authors share inspirations) as it looks at least superficially similar. though spm somehow managed to make the manifest file executable swift code. at least there's still time for them to avert that blunder before 1.0 also whoever was bitching about carthage before: setting up a target in your xcodeproj is the admission fee to avoid a cocoapods-style fuckup. you'll notice that cargo and spm both work like carthage
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2016 16:23
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:Not sure what thread to ask this in, so I'll ask it here: what's the etiquette for saying thank you after someone helps you on mailing list? Someone helped me on the open-mpi users mailing list today, and it seems rude not to say thanks, but I also don't want to spam everyone with an unnecessary "thank you" message. (Yeah yeah mailing lists are dumb, but it seems to be the standard way to get help for open-mpi stuff). if you phrase it as something like "that worked perfectly, thank you" then it is a genuinely useful confirmation for anyone silently following along or coming across the archives via a search. that would not feel spammy to me alternately, just do it until someone asks you to stop
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
HoboMan posted:gently caress, i don't know how to do poo poo
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
fleshweasel posted:basically if you are still making GBS threads your pants about how bad jsx looks or something, you don't understand react yet, so just keep working with it, and you'll get how simple and good it is. also you can just not use jsx while still using react if you're having hang ups about sticking your markup in with your code
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
LordSaturn posted:I wish somebody would make a popular language with a switch statement that was a SLOC savings over if-else swift
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
i know nothing about java. is there a useful database migration tool/library? it's a small project, so "don't bother" is a valid answer.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
sweet thanks
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
logback and slf4j both seem really cool. does that mean I'm correctly doing the java?
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:log4j2 even better, do stupid poo poo like colour highlighting. yikes
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
GameCube posted:resharper seems neat but there sure is a lot of overlap between its features and vs2015's. all i want is the drat code coverage and now i've got this thing offering to fix every god drat line in my solution resharper is massively overhyped and this gets even worse as vs integrates the genuinely useful pieces
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
please at least use a proper html parser
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2016 15:15
|
|
|
good luck parsing html with an xml parser then
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:one possible reason is if you're a terrible programmer whose first insticnt is to poo poo out some code rather than pausijg to wonder whether the wheel might possiblly already exist hi
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
ErIog posted:Joke's on you, turns out it's bespoke hand-written artisanal HTML written by Seth in Marketing. Also, he's dyslexic and sometimes makes syntax errors. Have fun! syntax errors? html?
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
is the hint "car extends vehicle"
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:
this is called a tagged gounion
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
christ, what an rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
fleshweasel posted:i honestly don't get why they added exceptions to swift because it doesn't really provide any value over Either<Result, Error> and it can't be used asynchronously which is where reasonable runtime errors happen more frequently-- network requests, I/O, location stuff, etc. they didn't add exceptions, there is no stack unwinding involved in a failed try. it is simply, as you've pointed out, a shittier version of Either/Result, plus a smidgeon of syntax and compiler niceties you can call NSException.raise() in swift but you can't catch it in swift imo swift try is kind of a stopgap. it's obviously better than the out-param NSError garbage it explicitly replaces but it's obviously worse than a proper Result. my guess is they couldn't muster the combined engineering and political capital to get all the way in one step. but I'm just a random jackass opining on the internet. you could ask rjmccall to weigh in as the (sole? main?) doer of swift try on the plus side im pretty sure the whole core team knows all this already and generally want to improve it
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
fritz posted:also bisect bisect doesn't require "linear stories" tho, just the occasional commit that actually compiles.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2016 16:08
|
|
|
I use git bisect maybe twice a year, and it's totally worth the "pain" of not being a gaping rear end in a top hat with your commits
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
that's a club??? actually though that's p cool
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:List<KeyValuePair<String,String>> allows for dupes where Dictionary<String,String> does not also the list is ordered, dictionary is only arbitrarily so
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:yeah, you know who else lived in gmt+2?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
why did i have to poke my nose into my html parser. of course the spec has changed pointlessly. <menuitem> works like <option> now u guys. countless lives presumably saved as exactly nobody implements this latest irrelevancy if node is in the special category then jump to the part of the adoption agency algorithm labelled done but don't forget to reconstruct the list of active formatting elements and furthermore  also somebody started another html parser in objc for some reason? you'd think one reinvented wheel was enough for this dying language anyway 1.0 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2016 07:01
|
|
|
raminasi posted:hard tabs are illegal characters in f# source files lol f# was right
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 16:26
|
|
|
eschaton posted:even now people will see clear and easily understandable code and say "here's a gist where I rewrote that code to be more swifty" that takes a bunch of untangling to understand but is marginally more ~*~ functional ~*~ on the other end of this spectrum (and I think horseshoe theory applies) are the asshats adding new answers to every loving stack overflow question with "the correct answer, in swift!" and it's the shittiest swift code that's so obviously just poorly transliterated objc. who the gently caress is that helping sometimes that answer has more upvotes than the one it's ripping off. idgi
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
kalstrams posted:how is mac for servers nowadays. or, to that matter, ever at all since os x times some ios shops throw a mac mini in the closet with jenkins on it. maybe itunes runs on mac servers (unless the java port of webobjects runs elsewhere? or am I talking out my rear end) that's probably it the os probably works fine as a server but the hardware is such a waste of $ if you're not directly touching it daily
|
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
git really is shamefully bad maybe it's good at what it was designed to do, but as someone who doesn't mail Linux patches around how would I ever know
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:im really surprised no one has just copied the git model of version control but made it easy to use and more featureful I feel like it should be possible to take the git internals and transfer protocols and whatever but come up with a console ui that is not shamefully bad. tig is cool but not really what I'm after
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2016 12:40
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 19:28 |
|
|
also I love all the suggestions that the reason I think git is shamefully bad is because I don't understand it. terrible programmers thread indeed
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2016 12:51
|
|