Annual Prophet posted:many thanks for the reply! some areas have more centers and richer opportunities and others fewer, but I'm a bit remote, so it's more the latter here, which always leaves me interested in others' experiences and sanghas. (fortunately, though it was pure serendipity, i happened to find a good group in what for the most part is my own tradition: Soto Zen, though I am shamelessly syncretic and mostly practice oriented).
|
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 05:12 |
I have a question for the Jodo Shinshu folks such as Senju (I think? Forgive me if I'm missing a nuance): The core concept of Jodo Shinshu is that you have to abandon yourself to "other power," right? I am curious how this is made compatible with dharma study, organized temple/sangha organization, and so forth, since it seems like these things suggest that you are still trying to do things by "self power." Also am I searching wrong or are the resources for Jodo Shinshu online kind of lovely, lol.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2017 10:54 |
At a friend's suggestion I watched the episode of "Chef's Table" on Netflix which featured Jeong Kwan's approach to temple cuisine. This basically owned as a television show, although there was far too much input, I thought, from random jagoffs from the New York Times who were saying incredibly basic things. However one thing which Kwan (Venerable Kwan? unsure, she's a nun) kept seeming to say was that the purpose of the temple cuisine was to encourage a 'static' sort of energy. Is this something actually relevant to Korean practice or was it either an idiosyncracy of hers, or just translators loving it up?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2017 05:17 |
cerror posted:At least the terrorists were intentionally targeting Buddhist statues. People defacing Buddhas, thinking they're related to Islam, is just plain confusing, and sad. But, you know, 'Murica.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2017 10:39 |
cerror posted:Am I the only one who thinks the name Amida Butsu is super fun to say? Give it a try. It's pretty rad. I am being pestered by a Catholic priest I know for what the Buddhist attitude about Jesus is. Specifically about Jesus Himself, mind you, not "Christianity" or "Christian theology." (Apparently they teach them bullshit about Buddhism, though based on his reactions to my amateur summaries, this is because otherwise they'd lose priests to the dharma)
|
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2017 09:15 |
Senju Kannon posted:seminaries are just really bad at teaching people about religions other than christianity unless you specifically do theology of religions, and even then you gotta be really, really fuckin good at it to not come out the other side with some hosed up ideas about like islam or hinduism or buddhism or somethin He did speculate that the concept of monasteries came out of Buddhism, though, which seems plausible to me.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2017 10:55 |
Caufman posted:That would make me want to first start with as uncontroversial a summary of Jesus as possible.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2017 11:05 |
Senju Kannon posted:all i can say is, having taken classes with catholic seminarians, you're giving them more credit than i'd give, especially if they're not jesuit I would kind of disagree that Buddhism and Christianity are working towards exactly the same ends in the specific sense of their internal realities and perspectives, although the broad message of 'be a good person' is there, and I guess you can certainly draw analogies between things like faith in the Primal Vow and some forms of Protestant 'pray to Jesus and be saved, probably; nothing else necessary' Part of why I have talked to this guy is general faith development, I also had to sort of half-assedly explain the concepts of karma and suffering to him since I think his idea was that it was something like "that small child with cancer did something to earn that cancer."
|
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2017 20:57 |
Caufman posted:Put differently, I wonder if Jesus of Nazareth were born 2,500 years ago as a prince of India or if Siddhartha were born 2,000 years ago as an unknown Palestinian Jew, would they have lived radically differently from our pairing? That's an unanswerable hypothetical, but I'm suggesting it's not a useless one to ask. I think they have broadly similar moral messages, but most religions have similar broad moral perspectives, with the differences being in nuance, emphasis, and the reasoning behind them. If I was going purely on doctrinal clarity in the original texts and subsequent interpretations, Christianity does pretty poorly.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2017 08:32 |
What does "holiness" mean here? (I'll give you compassion.)
|
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2017 09:38 |
Senior Scarybagels posted:That's what I thought, apparently according to the guy, buddha should be reincarnating any time now, unless he is also implying that he is Buddha.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2017 19:15 |
Senior Scarybagels posted:To be fair, he also claims Hermes is a previous life of Buddha too so I don't know if he had a strong grasp of the story in the first place. Or don't want to. I read about how the Hare Krishnas claim that Shakyamuni was a manifestation of Krishna in order to trick atheists into worshiping God. I was like, "man, rude."
|
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2017 12:12 |
Are you doing much practices or are you mostly there to work?
|
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2017 00:55 |
Paramemetic posted:They are preparing a lot of texts to be distributed as part of the event and that includes digitizing texts. During the proofread they hit a series of words that seemed off and so three of them all started reciting the text from memory until they hit the phrase, came to a consensus on it from their memorization, and corrected it accordingly. Did they start from the very beginning of the text, or do they kind of have it memorized as chapters?
|
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2017 05:18 |
Young Shakyamuni looks swag as hell. Was that one of the many signs of a superior being, swag?
|
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2017 21:07 |
Laocius posted:Hey Senju Kannon, I'm writing a paper on Pure Land ethics and I was wondering if you could point me to any good sources. Specifically, I'm researching how Pure Land thinkers have answered the question of "Why should I act morally if I'm going to be reborn in the Pure Land either way?" Sources related to any branch of Pure Land Buddhism would be fine, but I would think Jodo Shinshu thinkers would have some of the most interesting ideas. Thanks in advance! http://www.bdkamerica.org/book/pdf-commentary-text-tannisho-strategies-modern-living - this has commentaries on the Tannisho also, which address some of the issues you discuss in passing. (I guess I got one of the last paper copies!)
|
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2017 00:44 |
Senju Kannon posted:i mean, it is a similar vein tbh. i’m not up on calvinist history or the theology of american evangelicals but there are some superficial similarities between the two, though there isn’t double predestination in jodo shinshu Isn't there a very limited form of pre-destination floating around? Like the bodhisattvas and Maitreya, who presumably is at press time extant somewhere. At the same time I suppose these were ultimately things the persons in question decided to do long ago.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2017 07:13 |
Tias posted:Oh hey, I never realized there was a buddhist thread? I'm taking remedial religion 101, I may have some dumb questions about buddhism come exam time. The boundaries may be more porous than you'd think.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2017 06:40 |
It seems like it would be a difficult path to walk, between the relative paucity of original materials, the super new age types on the left, and on the right. I also enjoyed your postings in the liturgical thread. I imagine a lot of our crossover is because of the phenomenon my priest friend I mentioned a while back described: He may not think I'm on the right path, but like, he doesn't have to half-apologize for being a clergyman to me. Nessus fucked around with this message at 09:07 on Oct 31, 2017 |
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2017 07:18 |
Senju Kannon posted:
Is that an "abaj" I see there? Translate it for us, I don't recognize any of 'em
|
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2017 06:07 |
Senju Kannon posted:namu amida butsu, 南無阿弥陀仏
|
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2017 06:39 |
And won't you end up in the borderlands anyway, just for making the effort? (The books I got were kind of ambiguous.) Anyway that is super cool, what was the occasion for making it?
|
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2017 12:51 |
Laocius posted:Just search for Fo Guang Shan or the International Buddhist Progress Society. They're a Taiwanese Humanistic Buddhist organization. Wikipedia calls them a "new religious movement," but from what I've gathered thus far, their interpretation of Buddhism seems pretty orthodox, albeit very accommodating to modernization. What does "Humanistic" mean in this context? Do they not bring up things like rebirth? If I saw "humanistic Buddhism" here in America I'd probably think "oh OK it's some people who are preaching Buddhism with all the bits that scare educated liberals filed off."
|
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2017 07:21 |
Reading up, seems like it's a focus on how the Buddha was a human being and not a god, otherwise seems pretty orthodox, just more outreach-y.
|
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2017 07:55 |
Laocius posted:Yeah, "humanistic" basically just means that they're focused more focused on engaging with the human realm, rather than detaching from society or obsessing about death and ghosts. Of course, it's clearly a matter of degrees, since the service I went to involved a lot of prayers for the dead. They're also notable for making greater use of technology than more traditionalist organizations, to the point that it starts to approach megachurch territory sometimes. The service I went to just had some slide projectors and earpieces so that those of us who don't know Chinese could follow what was going on. Were you getting a live translation of the sermon?
|
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2017 21:19 |
Senior Scarybagels posted:As a member of the Fo Guang Shan, you guys have it pretty much down. I decided upon Fo Guang Shan for its more outreach-y style of action in the earth-realm and the fact it does not sequester you away from others, especially when others are suffering.
|
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2017 02:17 |
Dr. Video Games 0081 posted:I had some of the features of Quake's e1m2 pop into my head while I was meditating earlier today I get the occasional flash on MMO landscapes that I recognize.
|
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2017 05:59 |
Tias posted:No, my mind often starts playing back the theme from Airwolf for some reason.
|
|
# ¿ Dec 24, 2017 12:16 |
One possible way to help yourself get past this might be to figure that the path is imperfect, but since we can't at this moment dissect the full details of how Practice X achieves Liberation Y when done according to Routine Z, the best thing to do is to pursue the established route that has achieved success. Maybe the unusual sounds, acts, and so on activate subtle psychological or physiological cues that we will in time understand better in order to liberate sentient beings. Though speaking of sectarian practice, it's a little funny to me when I can look at pop Buddhism books and see their sectarian bias. If only my local library were better supplied!
|
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2018 21:56 |
What do you mean when you say polytheism? I think bodhisattvas are considered to be very powerful beings but they are not possessed of the qualities of the Abrahamic god or anything. Saints would probably be a better analogy.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2018 01:28 |
Keret posted:So, firstly, I have been mulling over the implications of the second precept recently — the vow not to take what is not freely given — and how it relates to my hobbies and undertakings in life. One of my biggest hobbies as of late is photography, and specifically with documentary and street photography, which usually involves taking candid photos of people and places around the city. It occured to me the other day, though, when discussing it with my girlfriend that the act of taking a person's picture without their expressed consent could be considered an act of theft. Thinking this over, it increasingly seemed to me that if that were true, those acts would run counter to the second precept. What do you all think, does the act of taking a person's photograph without explicit consent in public constitute theft from a Buddhist perspective, and does it run afoul of the second precept? You might err on the side of not harming by trying not to get faces in your photos, given all this development of face-tracking software...
|
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2018 21:58 |
I was reading something incredibly depressing the other day - a work of philosophical pessimism, not like, "a bad news article" - and I immediately thought of the bodhisattva vow and other Buddhist concepts in response to the points the author raised, and eventually came to the conclusion that he needed a hug and perhaps a meditation coach. I suppose this is progress! Really, I thought the problem was that he approached the general problem of suffering on the assumption that even if somehow everything currently extant ceased to be, that this would actually STOP anything as opposed to meaning suffering would arise in another location at some future date.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2018 00:23 |
I suppose this is a morbid way to revive the thread but you folks have guided me to a religion so I suppose it is fair enough. My grandfather died early this afternoon and I loved him tremendously, I was closer to him than to my father. It was not a great surprise - though it happened during a relatively minor operation. To complicate my own attachments, I was economically dependent on him and I was also in practice a sort of adopted youngest child based on the various age cohorts. I'm lost and afraid and while I suppose "prayers" is the wrong word, I would appreciate guidance. (A mild complication is that he was Jewish and so are his birth relations, though I am not - somewhat acculturated but not even a "lapsed" Jew.)
|
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2018 23:20 |
With the "scan your body" thing, what is your mental block? Probably the best outline I've had is that there's that kind of proprioception - like if you tighten up your back muscles or suck in your gut, the part of your body that knows that "suck in your gut" translates to that. If you do it on purpose you can kind of reach the phase where you have gotten to the point immediately prior to "activating that muscle" without actually activating it. Interior stuff seemed to be entirely visualization, although I would not be surprised if advanced practicioners were able to detect upsets or growths in themselves.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2018 19:45 |
Paramemetic posted:Sorry to hear about this - just because it's inevitable doesn't mean it's easy to lose people who are close to us. If we didn't have attachment to those around us, if we didn't cling to our dear ones, then this whole birth and old age and sickness and death business would be pretty easy, I guess. What are you looking for in terms of guidance? I can't tell you anything special, I don't have any magic words to make the suffering go away, but be with it, recognizing it as what it is, looking at where it comes from, and where it will go to. Don't try to imagine your emotions aren't real, let them come, but do look at what they come from.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2018 02:15 |
Boris Galerkin posted:This is the stuff I’m talking about. I really don’t believe this is true or even possible. I’d like to avoid anything or anyone or any app that suggests otherwise, unless it’s from a peer reviewed journal. When I hear this it’s no different than hearing about people who can survive on air or whatever.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2018 06:25 |
Boris Galerkin posted:In the end, I feel more calm, relaxed, and I guess centered no matter which of the above I do. My question is why can't I think about my feelings to figure out the root causes of why I'm feeling that way? Why can't I pursue an idea that comes to mind? I'm not really a meditation coach so take this analogy with several grains of salt and the full knowledge that it may be corrected: The interior dialogue you describe would be better if replaced by something along the lines of 'watching' the thoughts. Don't engage, just let them float past like clouds in the sky.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2018 08:51 |
Senju Kannon posted:check out this nembutsu "caligraphy" i made
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2018 20:05 |
I've found it persistently weird how there's like this strain in Western Buddhist thought which is basically "all this Buddhism stuff isn't real anyway; and we don't mean in the sense that nothing is objectively real, we mean it's all a song and dance and you have to find your own path, right?" And then of course you have the strain which is just neurology studies. Of course I might just be salty because of the relative paucity of Mahayana material I've been able to lay my hands on
|
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2018 13:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 05:12 |
Cephas posted:It's easy to convince someone to try a stress-reduction and relaxation technique, it's harder to convince them to adopt a different worldview. I've noticed that in several of my friends who were raised Christian and turned away from it, spirituality and philosophy are sore spots. Some of them feel pretty strongly that "if there are a thousand philosophies and religions that all say that they're right, then that means they're all moot and I should just trust my own intuition." I think for someone in that mindset, it's a lot easier to accept "sitting quietly can help you unwind" than "sitting quietly can help you witness the inherent nonself of conditioned phenomena"
|
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2018 13:02 |