|
InternetJunky posted:At the risk of exposing myself to further ridicule for not knowing everything about my 1dx -- is there anything that anyone can think of that would cause the camera to severely underexpose each picture? I went out shooting yesterday and every single shot has a histogram like this (auto-iso, so it's not that I'm specifying ISO 100 either): You dont have any filters attached do you? (I have done this)
|
#
¿
May 12, 2013 19:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 13:55 |
|
|
Tenderloin posted:I don't think the Sigma 8-16mm takes filters but would love to hear more about the differences. Definitely deliberating between this and Canon's 10-22mm which is a stop faster and about $100 cheaper, but I have the 17-55mm and kind of like that the 8-16mm doesn't overlap at all. Hmmm. My Sigma 8-16 came with a detachable cuff which acts as an extra hood but also has a thread to attach screw on filters. That said, using it at anything other than 16mm will leave your pictures looking like a Bond film intro.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2013 22:27
|
|
|
So, I've got a 60D and I would like to upgrade my general 'tourist' lens. Currently I'm using the 28-105 3.5/4.5 USM. I'm not happy with the results and I want to get something for no more than £450 - £500. I'm happy to go pre-owned and was looking at the 24-105 f4L IS which I understand is the standard kit lens on the full frames. I would also be happy to go with whatever is good from Sigma and Tamron, especially if they do something a bit quicker than f4.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2014 23:03
|
|