|
Less versions of IE/Win to debug! As of 2016, only the latest version of Internet Explorer per Windows version will be supported
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2014 13:40 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 07:52 |
|
zfleeman posted:I've been using cssfontstack.com, which I thought had 'web-safe' fonts. If you hover over the i you'll see it's installed on approximately 1.08% of Macs and 0% of Windows machines.
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2014 18:58 |
|
zfleeman posted:Oh, wow. Well, I really like the way it looks on my Mac. How can I figure out what it is that I am seeing so I can use that instead? If you don't have Firebug, I guess you could manually misspell a font in the stack until you see it change Even if you find which one it is that you like, you only know it is showing that font on your Mac. If you need everyone to see the exact same font, then either pay for one through typekit or get a free one (converting it with font squirrel and host it like you images, or use Google Fonts. The Merkinman fucked around with this message at 19:38 on Aug 8, 2014 |
# ¿ Aug 8, 2014 19:31 |
|
Even if you get it resolved, note that autoplay will not work on iOS or Android
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2014 05:56 |
|
fuf posted:gently caress me is there some universal law that if you make a website for someone they will only ever look at it on IE8?
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2014 19:14 |
|
I know there is -moz-appearance:none and -webkit-appearance:none to 'reset' stuff like <select> to make it less like the OS/Browser and give a little more control to style it. However, if something previously set a <select> to -moz-appearance:none, is there some new value to then make the select box back to the default OS/Browser look?
|
# ¿ Sep 11, 2014 20:24 |
|
Lumpy posted:Here's mine: you probably shouldn't. I like to say inputs are the electrical outlets of web design. An architect can design the craziest building, but people are going to expect to see the same normal thing when they go to plug in a lamp. This is also why I asked about returning inputs (specifically selects) to their default appearance.
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2014 13:35 |
|
Newf posted:How do I show/hide something without having the browser reinterpret the width of the containing element? Do you just want a black space where the glyphicon would be? If so, can you do visibility:hidden instead of display:none?
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2014 16:38 |
|
fuf posted:Design I was just given to work with It's for Halloween.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2014 14:26 |
|
Is there a good resource for creating a Style Guide? I've done some Googling and found stuff like A List Apart, but didn't know if there were any sites/documentation that people here liked.
|
# ¿ Nov 10, 2014 21:01 |
|
Foundation question: Is there a way to get columns to not reset when nesting? I'm just getting our Creative team to design responsive and made grids for them, but I think the idea of it resetting every time it gets nested is more of how I, as a dev, would code it.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 20:53 |
|
Chris! posted:I'm not sure I understand what you mean by reset? Do you mean when a column is nested with another row inside another row and column, you want to change how it scales down? code:
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 22:43 |
|
How do you feel about lightbox/modal windows that you clicked something to bring up? Personally I'd much rather add the content inline, than via modal.Lumpy posted:Come on now... you know you really want to download their mobile app.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2014 17:54 |
|
caiman posted:Is anyone using relative units (rems or ems) for media query breakpoints? I've been putting off attempting it for ages in fear that things will get super complex once I change the baseline font-size WITH my media queries, sort of creating a circular paradox. Turns out my fears were unwarranted because, as I'm sure most of you already knew, (r)ems in media queries are based on the browser's initial font value, NOT the values I set in my CSS. So they're consistent regardless of how much I've hosed with things. I guess if it's good enough for Foundation, it's good to go. I'm trying to stop using px for anything outside of like border-radius, instead using (r)em and %.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2014 22:10 |
|
Mister Chief posted:I want an effect where I have a list and its items are ticked or crossed off with an animation in sequential order. I could have a bunch of nth child rules with different delays but I just wanted to know if anyone knew of a better solution.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2015 15:14 |
|
From comments I've read on both Vivaldi and Spartan apparently there is no 'right' way to make a web browser. Vivaldi: It's just the same engine as Chrome and Opera, what's the point? Spartan: Oh great! M$ made their own engine again instead of going with something like WebKit
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2015 15:04 |
|
Is there any way to get the visibility classes for Foundation (hide-for-small-only, show-for-small-up, etc) to display inline when visible? It seems it's either block or none which is not what I want. If I do inline!important then it just never hides.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2015 21:27 |
|
Using <i> for icons, yay or nay? Also using <i class="icon-poo">post</i> or <i class="icon-poo"></i>post , since the latter would allow you to play the icon anywhere?
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2015 18:10 |
|
Any idea why an element with a single line of copy and equal heights and line-heights would be vertically aligned in Firefox but not Chrome? I can't just do a fiddle since it might be some other code conflicting. A simple test of the bare minimum is fine
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 22:54 |
|
Ghostlight posted:Well if it works fine in isolation then the problem is other code, at which point it could be virtually anything.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 23:20 |
|
revmoo posted:Yeah. Use the divide and conquer method, just start ripping code out until the problem goes away. It's the font? Has anyone had issues like this with Google Web Fonts?
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 00:46 |
|
v1nce posted:Here, have a thing I made for work: How do I use Borwser cache?
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 01:04 |
|
DrSunshine posted:Hello, it's me again. I was the guy back a few pages looking for Javascript help in designing my webcomic site. Well now it's active -- or at least a working prototype version -- thanks to you guys and your help! Validate your site. It showed some rookie mistakes, like having multiple elements with the same ID, and your page not having a <title>. Also depending on who you talk to, it should be responsive.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2015 19:13 |
|
Any idea why Foundation and Flex-box don't get along or what exactly is going on here? In Chrome and IE, the padding to the right of 'add' gets ignored so the copy isn't centered. Not including foundation fixes the issue, but I don't see why. All I see is the calculated width is different, but I don't see WHY it's different. Firefox doesn't have the issue.
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 18:51 |
|
Leshy posted:That took way too much time figuring out, but it was a nice puzzle!
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 22:41 |
|
Anyone here try out Spartan in the latest Windows 10 build? The Cortana integration seems neat, but it feels like that's the only site it works on. I've looked at the code and not seen anything special, and in fact it looks pretty sub par as far as code (two #footers, no microdata, etc). Any idea how it works?
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2015 14:11 |
|
I hate to interrupt this language chat, but does anyone know if it's possible for a single click to select all text in an input and have the copy/paste widget appear in iOS/Android? Calling .focus() and/or .select() highlights the field, but doesn't bring up the widget.
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2015 15:25 |
|
ufarn posted:I've only just started looking into replacing my <div>s with modern HTML5 tags, but I have some questions about semantics/best practices: (1) I've seen: code:
(2) I would think article is just the article itself not the list of articles. So I'd leave it with li.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2015 20:20 |
|
Lumpy posted:When does IE10 end of life? January 12th 2016
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2015 22:32 |
|
MoosetheMooche posted:Wow, this is way more help and information than I could have hoped for and in such a short period of time. I just woke up so I'm going to spend the day checking out the code and suggestions you guys have posted for me. Just wanted to say thanks, it really seems like a great community in this sub forum. MoosetheMooche posted:e: While I'm here, is it good practice to keep css style info in an external file or is including it in every sub-page of the website a good idea? Since it's a fairly basic website with just a nav-bar and writing I'm thinking an external style page would be good to keep the code looking neater but if I'm wrong please let me know! MoosetheMooche posted:Also, is there a good program for design/code view like that website you guys linked to? I've been using Dreamweaver but it seems to do some wonky stuff and I have to manually click refresh every time I make a change which kind of ruins the whole point of the thing (convenience). MoosetheMooche posted:Doesn't the some-container actually make it more difficult for a browser to resize the website? It seems like I have to put in a set resolution that the page will display as instead of having it adapt to my browser like it would normally. For example you have set the resolution to 800x400 which only looks right if I have my browser window quite small. Is it a necessity to use Media Queries when I nest the menu/website in a container?
|
# ¿ May 13, 2015 19:04 |
|
Lumpy posted:I agree, and I actually start off in Sketch. Just pointing out that not knowing Illustrator (or not wanting to pay for it) wasn't a deal breaker, and that you can get your feet wet with $EDITOR and your browser. 1. Cross-Platform 2. Not so arrogant about OS X.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2015 15:13 |
|
The Dave posted:If you want to make it even less attractive: what's the role of social media for this brand? We need to get Facebook Likes why? because... Facebook
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2015 14:35 |
|
I've been using Foundation (4 and 5) for quite some time, but now I want to build a main stylesheet uses SCSS. How do I do something as simple as change the font-family for a label element? It's not in the list of variables. Also am I supposed to be changing _settings.css, make a new _custom.css or put it at the bottom of _app.scss? I followed the instructions on installing from CLI (because while we spend all day coding GUIs, heaven forbid we use one otherwise more people will be in our sekret club).
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2015 18:57 |
|
Which one of you, probably freelancers, made this site?
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2015 18:48 |
|
I'm sorry if this is off the current discussion, but how do you tackle performance (load time, size)? I know there are tools to measure, but what am I measuring for? What is too slow? If I don't give an actual number, then others will want to add more and more features and umpteen marketing tags. I was at a conference with other people from other companies recently and they all mentioned actually removing features/tracking to get the site to be faster, but gave no goal number.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2015 15:58 |
|
Skandranon posted:This is really a failure of the business analysis portion. They should have a specific goal for how fast an application should be for various things. For example, Google has a specific < 1s time limit for it's queries. A product doesn't get released until it is faster than 1s. Saying "Make X faster" without a benchmark of what is good enough is impossible to really satisfy. That's my point. How do I figure out what good enough is? Since one hasn't been provided to me (through the failure of the business analysis) how do I make one of my own to then tell the business analysts?
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2015 18:17 |
|
Skandranon posted:Well, if you are the developer, and they give you vague requirements, pick the interpretation you like best. 0.01% faster IS faster. Conversely, you can send them some emails explaining how their requirements suck (need clarification). I don't know how contentious your relationship is with the people who do business analysis. Performance isn't really on anyone's radar, and I'm trying to make it be the case. (in fact I've heard through the grapevine that one associate explicitly said performance didn't matter). So if I'm saying "our site should be faster", I don't want to be the one to vaguely say "faster" instead of something more specific. Lumpy posted:Point this at your site and it it's all green you did good? https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/ The Merkinman fucked around with this message at 21:10 on Sep 19, 2015 |
# ¿ Sep 18, 2015 21:39 |
|
HardDisk posted:Can someone point me to a starting point on how to optimize a bloated template? My designer started from a prebuilt template but it's massively slow on mobile devices, especially when scrolling. Just blame the devices
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2015 20:23 |
|
Morroque posted:Okay, I've been wrangling this for the past two days, so I'll ask: is there any way using CSS for truncating single-line text to fit a variable-width div whose size is dictated ? display: block; white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; is weirdly specific about when and where it will or will not work. (I have on one page where one DIV is properly cutting off excess text, yet adamantly refusing to do the same for another DIV.) If not, is there some jquery solution to do the same thing?
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2015 18:23 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 07:52 |
|
I have this SPA, not written in Angular/React/Anything special. A user presses a button and content dynamically appears above the button. Depending on how much content it is, it pushes the page down, so it gives the appearance that the page has jumped (ie, the button is no longer in the persons view). Is there any way around this? I tried figuring out how far they were scrolled before/after the dynamic content, but as some of the content is an image, my numbers are off. I don't see how I could just hardcode the height of the image as its responsive.
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2015 15:13 |