|
You are tough, man. Dave have that match ****, and I would agree. Your criticisms aren't wrong, because there are botches, and it's overbooked and they botched the admittedly bad ending, but .5/5 is pretty cold.
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2013 06:00 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 01:47 |
|
Your star ratings are VERY different than mine, but this thread rules. Keep it humming.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2013 05:34 |
|
That's one of the big differences between Vince and HHH. Vince knows that the heel needs to show his rear end.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2013 06:30 |
|
Sexay today and Lawler of the 90s could be twins.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2014 06:35 |
|
Bikertaker as a face certainly sucked rear end, he was booked as the worlds biggest douche, but was still a face. After he turned heel, I really liked it. His match with Flair and title run were both pretty great.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2014 17:03 |
|
Wasn't Linda just faking being sedated? Thought that was clear at mania.
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 22:10 |
|
Beef Jerky Robot posted:That match is so loving good. It's really as good as the wwe format can be, or could ever be , I would imagine.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2014 04:56 |
|
Was that Ravens best WWF match?
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 06:07 |
|
Claytor posted:This gets funnier when you realize that the only reason Taker is considered even a passable wrestler is because he spent the last decade on a limited schedule, mostly working meticulously planned Wrestlemania matches. Taker was actually pretty great starting around 96 or so. He had really good matches against Bret, Shawn, Foley and Austin. You could easily make the argument that he regressed as biker taker, but he had a really solid few years there in the late 90s.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2014 17:31 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 01:47 |
|
JGKing posted:Winner and STILL WWF Champion: Stone Cold Steve Austin 1.5/5 - A thoughtfully structured match with the exception of that horrendous finish. What on earth was the point of that? I think the finish was called on the fly after SCSA was hurt during the table bump.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2014 20:32 |