|
Moey posted:Due to some most likely price mistake yesterday, I ordered two more SSDs for my home esxi box. I'll now have 750gigs of non redundant fast storage to spin up labs with. The amazon uk one? I cashed in on that as well.
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2013 19:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 03:22 |
|
|
Moey posted:Oh yea. 250gb for 76ish is awesome. Same here, this one seemed like it might go through, too bad 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2013 19:24
|
|
|
Does anyone know hwere to get hardware in the EU? My boss promised me some of the servers falling out of the inventory, but he isn't following up on it, so I am wondering where I could buy some old stuff.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2013 13:15
|
|
|
Two different physical locations is like a prime example of seperate subnets. If you move to the other area you have to change ip. Just like irl.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2013 20:54
|
|
|
sudo rm -rf posted:So I'd like to get a rack. Any decent smalls ones that I can put on top of my desk? Currently have 6U worth of equipment, would probably need at least 9U or maybe even 12U to make sure I have room for expansion. IKEA Lackrack - available in two depths and costs around 5 $ 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2014 11:48
|
|
|
I have two 560 twin frozrs without the plastic fans because they died. What to do?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 24, 2014 22:02
|
|
|
Over 200 dollars for a 1TB HDD? What's the deal here?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2014 18:32
|
|
|
Moey posted:59.99 each, quantity 4. Woops, completely missed that, now it all makes sense.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2014 17:12
|
|
|
Docjowles posted:Or maybe targeting yourself with metasploit? Is there a version of metasploit that is somewhere as usable as dSploit? The software from metasploit.com is very uncomfortable to use.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
devmd01 posted:And for virtualization, if your work has some older decommissioned servers (and maybe even storage!) lying around, talk to your boss and see if you can use them for lab use "after hours." Better yet, run it in your company's datacenter so they're paying for the electricity. Why spend money if you don't have to? And have the network team on your rear end because you are the greatest liability ever? Better not.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
devmd01 posted:lol just lol, not everyone works in a megacorp, I can throw a pen across the room and hit our network person. I can tear down and rebuild our production vmware cluster all day long; i'm not going to break anything on the network by running a separate vmware cluster on a completely different network segment, calm the gently caress down. Well I am the network guy in a small place now, and I definitely wouldn't let anyone experiment in our data center.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
MC Fruit Stripe posted:The only problem with letting someone set up a lab environment is that it uses company resources in the way of datacenter rack, power and cooling. If you're concerned about it from a network standpoint then your network guys aren't on top of things. You're not gonna run a lab without any internet access. The only internet access in the data center is gonna be the companies.
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2016 08:05
|
|
|
NippleFloss posted:Of course you can. Especially if all you're doing is setting up GNS3 or packet tracer or whatever. If you really want to lock it down then you just force them to use a jump box to move software into the lab, or even make them put it on removable media. Meh, maybe I'm paranoid from hospital work, but I wouldn't allow that.
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2016 16:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 03:22 |
|
|
So I took a look at the config and your first mistake is having Port 3 tagged & untagged. Really you should just make it a trunkport (if netgear lets you) or at least have it tagged for all vlans that go into the vm host. The VM host then needs to put the two virtual adapters (plugged into virtual switch) on the two vlans respectively. E: I couldn't quite figure out the PVID menu, but you shouldn't have to set anything there.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2016 11:52
|
|