|
Brannock posted:I'm also told there are "twitchings" in the Romanian political scene - does anyone know more regarding this? In a nut-shell, the Romanian political system is taking queues from what's going on in Russia vis-a-vis homophobic legislation. Things are nowhere near as wild-west as in Russia on this, but are progressing in a worrying direction nonetheless. At the risk of sounding like an Internet Atheist I feel that some of the blame is shouldered by the Orthodox Church, who's influence can be felt in pressure for such legislation, in their support for far-right parties and in their official declarations that make it clear they see no problem with increasing discrimination. Current News: http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-esentia...ortodoxa-ro.htm Translating cliff notes version: "7th of June - On the fifth of June a parliamentary commission for constitutional revision has adopted an amendment that changes the legal definition of marriage as being between spouses to the more rigid wording of "between a man and a woman". This amendment was proposed by three MPs from the Liberal party, and backed by the Orthodox Church." ............................... Political Parties & Factions Noua Dreaptă (English: New Right) More or less literal fascists, worship the WWII-era Romanian Iron Guard. You'll see these guys in every counter-protest to Pride Parades and other events where they often mingle with Orthodox Church supporters. Membership is considered low, possibly because they are ridiculously overt in their leanings. crowfeathers posted:In Romania, there has been an increase in support for The New Right, a group which is affiliated with and works with Golden Dawn, and which literally uses 1920s Romanian Fascist iconography in its propaganda. They call for the persecution of immigrants, LGBTQ citizens, and communists, as well as the annexation of Hungary. Unlike Golden Dawn, however, they have been refused registration as a political party and as such are limited to rallies and physical violence against anyone they dislike. Which is, I suppose, technically a better situation. quote:The organization's leader has his own rock group, Brigada de Asalt (The Assault Brigade), which specializes in ultranationalist and far right Romanian legionnaire-oriented songs. Partidul Noua Generaţie - Creştin Democrat, PNGCD; formerly Partidul Noua Generaţie, PNG (English: New Generation Party – Christian Democratic) Fringe party owned by Gigi Becali, "businessman", owner of the FC Steaua Bucarest football club and all-around neanderthal shithead. Could be considered the politically "legitimate" (ugh...) version of the New Right, as they can stand for election and tend to scrape a few percents in every run. Their ideology is pound for pound that of the New Right; an emphasis on ultra-nationalism, the exaltation of the Orthodox Church, your garden variety xenophobia and homophobia, etc... ............................... An interesting note in Eastern European countries is that the Orthodox Church does much to prop-up and legitimize these groups socially, as their views tend to align in a lot of ways. The Orthodox Church is certainly mounting far greater resistence to progressive movements than the churches of Western Europe, with concerted attempts to maintain socially conservative paradigms. Might dig up some actual articles after I get some sleep. KazigluBey fucked around with this message at 01:40 on Aug 10, 2013 |
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 01:33 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 15:04 |
|
The Romanian New Right: Portrait is Avram Iancu, a fairly interesting historical figure co-opted by the New Right for various reasons. Anti Marriage Equality Rally. The boy and the girl on the left are dressed in traditional peasants' garbs. Banner translation: Against Homosexuality, For Normality Lair of Shitheads. If you've seen Golden Dawn offices in pictures or news reports, see if you can spot all the similarities! KazigluBey fucked around with this message at 02:03 on Aug 10, 2013 |
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 02:00 |
|
General China posted:The Catholic Church aint doing so well on historical dictators during the 20th century either. Its got all the western european ones- Hitler, Mussolini and Franco. Its also got all the South American ones too. Not contesting that in the least, but while the churches of Western Europe have distanced themselves from national extremism in the last couple of decades the Eastern ones seem to have doubled down. That was largely what I was getting at. e.: Sup crowfeathers, fellow Romanian representing?
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 02:05 |
|
ThirdPartyView posted:Didn't most of the Catholic Church leadership also support Salazar for a good part of his reign in Portugal? Yes, much like in Spain the state in Portugal was supported by the church because (among other things) their primary political opponents at the time were Communists. Anecdotal, but when Salazar survived an assassination attempt by anarco-syndicalists on the 4th of July, 1937, the bishops of Portugal called it an "act of God" that Salazar was unscathed, sparing Portugal of "the scourge of Communism".
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 02:16 |
|
Czech Republic / Slovakia / Hungary Forced sterilization of Romani women – a persisting human rights violation quote:Between 1971 and 1991 in Czechoslovakia, now Czech Republic and Slovakia, the “reduction of the Roma population” through surgical sterilization, performed without the knowledge of the women themselves, was a widespread governmental practice. The sterilization would be performed on Romani women without their knowledge during Caesarean sections or abortions. Some of the victims claim that they were made to sign documents without understanding their content. By signing these documents, they involuntarily authorized the hospital to sterilize them. In exchange, they sometimes were offered financial compensation or material benefits like furniture from Social Services – though it was not explicitly stated what this compensation was for. The justification for sterilization practices according to the stakeholders was “high, unhealthy” reproduction. Romania The Extreme Right in Contemporary Romania Pretty well put together 16 page report. If you've got the time and inclination to learn more about the far right in Romania, give this a look. quote:Under the leadership of Becali, the ideology of the party has come close to that of the inter-war fascist legionary movement with an added twist of opportunism, demagogy and gutter talk. In the past, Becali has appropriated symbols and slogans of the Iron Guard, and the party slogan currently displayed on its official website - »Serving the Cross and the Romanian Nation!« – reflects this fusion of conservative Christian Orthodoxy and mythologised nationalism. In terms of structure, the PNG-CD resembles the PRM inasmuch as it is largely centred on its leader. Thus, what the party lacks in programme is made up for by Becali’s insulting language, homophobia and intolerance. So far he has been fined several times by the National Council for Combating Discrimination for making discriminatory statements against women, the Roma and other ethnic minorities, and he is well known for his homophobic statements. At one point he stated that he would never hire gay players in his football team and that »homosexuals are protected by Satan« (ProTV, 2012) quote:The inclusion of the Romanian Orthodox Church (BOR) in a study of the extreme right in Romania is motivated by the role it has played in informing and influencing the extreme right discourse in Romania. The BOR has a long history of articulating and/or supporting an ethnically based conception of the nation. Over time, the BOR ideological position has intersected (directly or implicitly) with that of other extremist political groups. In inter-war Romania, the collaboration between the Iron Guard and the Orthodox Church was extensive, with a large number of priests sympathising with the Iron Guard and even running in elections for the »Everything for the Country« Party (Iordachi, 2004: 35). Currently, the attitude of the BOR can be summarised – as Andreescu (2004:178) points out – in terms of four characteristics: its exclusivist nationalist definition of the Romanian state (equating the Romanian state with the Romanian nation and the Romanian nation with the Christian Orthodox faith); its authoritarian, fundamentalist tendency to subordinate the notion of rule of law to that of divine right; the use of aggressive instruments to protect its position; and its ability to mobilise people and resources to achieve its aims. ............................ Jedit posted:They should have called that song "If You Can't Beat The Fascists, Join Them". Seriously? Wow, what a zinger. Yeah totally, bashing the fash makes you *gasp* a fash! Oh the irony! Pesmerga posted:So, in your opinion the battle of Cable Street was wrong then?
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 13:51 |
|
Russia thegailygrind is a good source on what's happening in Russia, as they seem to be keeping a close eye. The following articles aren't like the ones in the OP, but the second one might qualify as due to pictures. Russian LGBT Activist Attacked By Angry Mob of Russian Military Paratroopers in St. Petersburg (Video) quote:While holding a one-man protest against LGBT rights violations in Russia, activist Krill Kalugin was attacked by an angry mob of Russian military paratroopers in St. Petersburg Friday, August 2. The Russian paratroopers were celebrating Russia’s Paratroopers Day, an annual military pride celebration which according to the Animal New York traditionally involves groups of soldiers spilling into public square for merriment, flag waving, wallowing in public fountains and miscellaneous public drunkenness. In a video captured by PaperPaper.ru, a young man is surrounded by a mob of angry paratroopers who begin attacking him and hurling profanity laden questions at the young man. “What the gently caress were you thinking, showing up at Palace Square, human being?” yells the groups leader. Emphasis mine. Yes, the cops show up to arrest the activist that was getting beat-up, not the paratroopers. Pavel Petel Says He’s Scared Living In Russia: ‘People Threaten Me, Sometimes They Attack’ (slightly pictures) quote:You may recognize Pavel Petel as an openly gay model-activist, and gender-bending muscle stud originally from the Ukraine, but currently living in Russia. With Russia’s recent passage of anti-gay laws basically forbidding the use of the word gay or any so-called homosexual ‘propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations,’ LGBT entertainment blog The Back Building interviewed Petel to see how he was coping and whether he was planning on leaving Russia.
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 14:16 |
|
Jedit posted:The Cable Street protesters chose to start the fight; in the process they surrendered the moral high ground. Say it ain't so, anything but that! quote:They also did a lot to prove that Mosley was right Jesus loving Christ. You're literally spinning this into a moral victory for Mosley and the black-shirts, I can't loving believe it...
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 19:25 |
|
ReV VAdAUL posted:Can you offer evidence of this? I'd be interested to see it. Also, since what killed the BUF was government intervention I could claim just as glibly that it was Cable Street and other antifa events that attracted public attention to the BUF and subsequently helped solidify governmental interest in sorting out the problem. But no, I'm sure you're right and the proper response to fascist movements is to ignore them and let them play politics as they wish. They're harmless and if we just let them become legitimate political actors they'll be pacified and play ball by the rules the democratic process asks. This in no way can backfire and has never backfired historically.
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 22:54 |
|
Civilized Fishbot posted:Is there a reason why tactics such as raising awareness/providing alternatives so that individuals don't turn to fascism/politically empowering marginalized groups/aiding poor communities would not work in bringing down fascism? Is there a reason why this is an OR choice rather than an AND choice? Do these options cancel each other out? The Battle of Hayes Pond quote:The Klan ceased its activities in Robeson County thereafter. e.: I see you are ignoring the requests for citations. You know who else didn't back up his theories on society with hard facts? KazigluBey fucked around with this message at 23:17 on Aug 10, 2013 |
# ¿ Aug 10, 2013 23:14 |
|
Civilized Fishbot posted:No, a group could certainly act against fascist groups in both violent and nonviolent ways. My concern is that acting against them in violent ways could prove to accomplish less than it would empower fascist groups through allowing them to claim oppression/violent repression - which could cause their own followers to become more radicalized and those on the fence to lean toward the supposedly-oppressed fascist group. Again, not sure political gains from whining about oppression really work out for the fash (edit: in the long term, beyond immediate gains, because when these assholes start making the news the sympathy drains fast). This kind of behavior runs contrary to the image they like to cultivate about themselves, for one. Further, it's rare that actual coverage of fash events where antifa makes a move are covered in an entirely sympathetic way to the fash. If anything, because of how entirely transparent these groups are in their belief more media exposure is bad for them, not good. As for the Golden Dawn, I think you've got a different issue altogether. By this point it becomes a new problem in that the police tolerate their violence, and much like in Russia they can expect to escape prosecution for the crimes they commit. I ask then, in this kind of scenario isn't it madness to ask people to just hunker down and respect the GD's political legitimacy? Should people just lie down and take it, maybe talk to the GD every once in a while and hope they change their minds about the whole, you know, being racist shitheads thing? Jedit posted:Says the man who hasn't even backed up his theory on what I said in this thread with a quote that proves it. Reminder that there were no "claims" in this thread before you started the hand-wringing about counter-action. Your link is neat but have you actually gone and read it more closely? Because the pattern that emerges in "'Some Lesser Known Aspects': The Anti-Fascist Campaign of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, 1936-40" is that the government was highly receptive to the idea of crack-downs and enhanced surveillance of groups like the BUF. But things aren't that simple anymore, are they? What of counties where the government aids and abates these groups? What of countries where they can run for office legitimately with no opposition from the system? Lemme shift my goal-posts and call myself on it to save you the trouble, but it doesn't matter what the particular effects of cable street were, the issue is for the necessity of direct action against fascism- in this case, "direct" means "violent if need be". Do you think what now applies to the UK would work in Greece or Russia? KazigluBey fucked around with this message at 00:26 on Aug 11, 2013 |
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 00:22 |
|
Reminder this was kicked off by Jedit equating Antifa to fascism.
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 00:28 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:You don't go out and beat up the fash for shits and giggles, you go out and beat the fash when they're trying to stomp on some immigrant neighbourhood. Completely agree with this post. To my knowledge nobody here is baying for blood. If Antifa can carry an action with just the counter-protest, showing numbers and getting some press coverage of the opposition then fine. We had an Antifa counter-protest to an SDL thing in Aberdeen a few months ago and it was perfectly civil. I'm not baying for blood or throwing around UP AGAINST THE WALL or anything. Now, if they start marching in uniform, if the police are co-oped, if the political system begins backing them... I'm not sure purely passive resistance will do much in places like Greece or Russia. But sure, according to forums poster Jedit bashing the fash makes you a fash, period. OK, whatever.
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 00:39 |
|
Fojar38, if you don't want people to be condescending how about dropping dumb rhetoric like "Well you guys aren't talking about banning far left parties, so check mate. " Fringe parties with Communist leanings are not a growing threat across Eastern Europe and Russia, leading to all the crap that can be found in the OP and in a few other posts in the thread. And yes, if a party started gaining traction and their ideology was literally Bolshevism with a side order of Stalinist purges on the horizon I'd be up in arms about it. But your example of "well what about left parties people dislike" is the reddest of red herrings. edit: Seriously, this complaint is mad given the thread's topic. Sorry we weren't talking about extremist far left parties, get back to us when they are as relevant in the EU/Russia as the stuff in the OP. Fojar38 posted:The lack of self-awareness in this thread is nothing short of astonishing. Everyone has the right to assemble, protest, and participate in politics no matter how vile and ugly their opinions are. This is the very foundation of democracy. Do you realize how insanely easy to Godwin this argument is? Should a party who's platform is violence and discrimination be allowed political agency? Do you think Golden Dawn are a legitimate political force, or that what's going on in Russia should be respected in the name of democratic serenity? Is the banning of political parties always wrong in your mind, such as with the Romanian New Right?
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 03:59 |
|
Fojar38 posted:I'm pretty sure that I've said that what is occurring in Greece has moved beyond politics as the Golden Dawn has begun to use violence. I think that there is a moral imperative to oppose fascists when they become violent. But banning political parties for saying things that you don't like undermines democracy. Violence is the threshold that must be crossed first. The banning of the Romanian New Right party and their prevention from running in elections; in your mind, good or bad?
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 04:04 |
|
Silver2195 posted:I guess your defense of McCarthyism means you're at least intellectually consistent. The gently caress? My point was it's useless to decry our lack of attention on X ideology or Y ideology when neither of them are gaining traction nor representing growing threats. Reiterating, but if parties sprang up across Europe and followed the thinking and style of Pol Pot's or Stalin's brand of Communism I'd agree it'd be a problem. This is not happening, however. What's being suggested here by you lot is that examples of ideology of fascism turning violent must be divorced from consideration of the ideology itself. That Golden Dawn is an issue, granted, but that it cannot be used as an argument against its core ideology. So in essence any ideology, no matter how hateful or dangerous must be allowed political agency through the party system until it becomes violent, at which point it is divorced from the party that went violent and we just shrug our shoulders and soldier on. How many free plays should this be valid for, in your opinions? How many do-overs does an ideology get before we decide that maybe, just maybe, if its core tenants are inherently violent and giving them legitimacy may be a bad idea? The Romanian New Right literally declared itself the spiritual successor to the Iron Legions. I take it then that we should have shrugged and let them go about their business until heads got bashed in or whatever at which point we were to act like we didn't see it coming, or that we plainly did but were reduced to being passive actors until they made the first move. Crazy thought, but parties whose ENTIRE PLATFORM is "I want all the immigrants to leave", "I think that Hitler had some things right", "gently caress [insert minority here], they are scum" might be willing to act on these thoughts when granted power. Maybe there should be some things you aren't really allowed to build your platform on, like an ideological base-work that inevitably leads to violence. But gently caress it, Jedit was right, I'M the fash for calling the fash unlawful. KazigluBey fucked around with this message at 04:50 on Aug 11, 2013 |
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 04:45 |
|
Chamale posted:Not before that point because someone identifies the local conservative party as a fascist group. Strawman argument, nobody is arguing this in the thread. KazigluBey posted:What's being suggested here by you lot is that examples of ideology of fascism turning violent must be divorced from consideration of the ideology itself. That Golden Dawn is an issue, granted, but that it cannot be used as an argument against its core ideology. So in essence any ideology, no matter how hateful or dangerous must be allowed political agency through the party system until it becomes violent, at which point it is divorced from the party that went violent and we just shrug our shoulders and soldier on. How many free plays should this be valid for, in your opinions? How many do-overs does an ideology get before we decide that maybe, just maybe, if its core tenants are inherently violent and giving them legitimacy may be a bad idea?
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 05:02 |
|
Russia Russian State TV Host: Gay Heart and Blood Donations Are ‘Unsuitable For The Continuation Of Life’ And ‘Must Be Buried or Burned’ (Video) quote:In a 30-second clip made public by Spectrum Human Rights Alliance, Russian news host Dmitry Kiselev, called the donation of human organs by homosexuals ‘unsuitable for the continuation of life’ and ‘must be buried or burned.’ His statements aired on the news show Historical Process on Rossiya 1, Russia’s primary state-owned television network in April, and received the applause of the audience members. Emphasis mine. Homosexuals, literally vampires.
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 14:15 |
|
Obdicut posted:I just don't think we can actually guarantee the safety of the athletes. Putin's government won't give a poo poo if they get beaten up or even killed. Specifically they've been warned to not bring attention to their sexual orientation while in Russia by Russia's Sports Minister or face the risk of arrest. As far as we know this is the hard line, that anything that runs afoul of the extremely broad Anti-Gay-Propaganda law will be cracked down on, which can be as little as a few lines spoken to a reporter's camera.
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 16:44 |
|
SickZip posted:http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/482897/20130625/paris-neo-nazi-video-clement-meric-killed.htm Yeah, what a loving idiot that kid was, getting killed like that. Nothing in your linked article backs up what you are saying about Meric. But whatever, clearly he had it coming.
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 16:47 |
|
All Slopes Are Slippery.
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 20:03 |
|
Would be nice if the thread could keep away from the tiresome slapfight between ideologies, but given some of the names that have joined in I guess there's no hope for that. Cross-post from the D&D Pictures Thread: ekuNNN posted:Greek rapper and anti-fascist Pavlos Fyssas was stabbed to death yesterday by Golden Dawn members. I wonder how effective a ban will be and if it will be enforced, given the utter ACAB showing of the Greek police and how they've pretty much thrown in more or less 100% with the GD.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2013 22:11 |
|
New urban guerrilla group claims murders of Golden Dawn membersquote:A previously unknown urban guerrilla group calling itself Militant Popular Revolutionary Forces has claimed responsibility for the murders of two Golden Dawn members on November 1.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2013 02:52 |
|
Leftist militants claim Golden Dawn killings as rally honours 1973 uprisingquote:Thousands of Greeks, marking the 40th anniversary of the Athens Polytechnic uprising – an event that would trigger the end of military rule in Greece – took to the streets on Sunday after socialist militants claimed responsibility for the murder of two members of the extremist Golden Dawn party.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2013 18:16 |
|
Mans posted:The reports that talk about leftists being driven away also talk about rejection of LGBT protesters and the open anti communist stance of the far right is open and clear throughout the entire thing. You keep saying this or things like this, yet after blitzing through the thread the other day in order to get caught up this doesn't seem to come up as much as you make it out, especially during the periods in which people were live-updating as events unfolded. Yes, people posted, especially during the beginning of the whole mess, that there was fascist symbols and iconography present among some protestors, yet even then nobody was claiming they were a majority or in control. I'm surprised that more non-Russian sources on this haven't been posted, if it's such a widespread problem, especially local sources given the amount of on-the-ground footage found earlier in the thread. EDIT: I am referring to the Easter Europe thread, actually, didn't notice this was the Fash thread, though the Ukraine/Fash topic is being discussed in both thread so I guess easy mistake to make. KazigluBey fucked around with this message at 03:57 on Feb 27, 2014 |
# ¿ Feb 27, 2014 03:54 |
|
Ardennes posted:Ultimately there isn't much to go on, because by and large it is very difficult to tell the political motives of those involved unless they actually were talking around with a flag or symbols. If anything it was largely anonymous over many times the flags you saw were UPA and Ukranian in the more violent sections in the protests rather than EU and Ukrainian in the maidan itself, and sometimes you might see a Svoboda or a UDAR flag. This became more mixed and convoluted in the last days as the riot police charged right into the maidan itself. However, one thing is for sure, it was hard to find any leftist flags of note (unless you mistook a UPA flag for an Anarchist one). I don't remember seeing any rainbow flags either. OK interesting, though again, does anyone have a better idea of ratios and numbers and stuff? Because this seems to have become the central topic of discussion in the Eastern Europe thread with regards to the Ukraine protests but unlike previous coverage it seemed to me to include a whole heck of a lot less on-the-ground footage shot by Ukrainians, or Ukrainian articles or stuff like that.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2014 04:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 15:04 |
|
Mans posted:You didn't see people posting about how fascist present in the protests isn't a bad thing, that they being on the "good" side is not something to be concerned about and that thinking two times about it means you're just worried about your ideologic purity? Yes, I saw those posts, along with yours and a few other posters that seemed to fixate on a massive swing rightward for the Ukraine, or something to that effect given how much you played it up. My question stands, though: given the degree of footage that we have in that thread, along with Ukraine-source articles and the like, how come there isn't something a bit more concrete to base what you and others were saying? Saying "You don't need a majority of people to be on the far right parties for them to spread their poison." isn't helpful, because it isn't a statement on the political leaning and balance of the current political landscape of the Ukraine, post protests. Do you have more to back it up, especially from Ukraine sources? I'd very much appreciate reading about it, if it's such a looming problem.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2014 05:27 |