|
Brannock posted:Any omissions were gaps in my personal knowledge. Can you or someone else tell us more about Jobbik? Here is a pretty good article on Jobbik, it also has 2 videos, one specifically about Hungary and one is a debate about extremeism in europe: http://www.channel4.com/news/hungary-jobbik-far-right-militias-jewish-congress FairyNuff fucked around with this message at 01:59 on Aug 10, 2013 |
#
¿
Aug 10, 2013 01:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 08:48 |
|
|
Blackbird Fly posted:Such a law would definitely go to SCOTUS. Therefore, how can you frame the banning of certain words, devoid of circumstance, on an objective basis? How do you establish a good precedent so the government won't turn it around to ban words they don't agree with? Context means quite a lot, and a person doesn't need to openly throw around epithets to be defamatory. Even innocent words can be warped into weapons. How do we separate defamation from criticism? If only there were other countries with Hate Speech laws that you could base them off.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2013 12:36
|
|
|
Blackbird Fly posted:There is still precedent to deal with, your laws are not ours: Yeah I understand there are differences which is why I said about basing them off them so they'd be able to be adapted for your legislation, rather than just copy and pasting them. Miltank posted:Are the same posters who are against antifa action for hate speech laws? Is that just because hate speech laws work within the state's monopoly on force? I'm for antifa action and hate speech laws, so no.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2013 14:58
|
|