|
Fortis posted:Our marketing department hired a "Email Marketing & Campaigns Manager". She's been here ~35 business days (since late November) and has filed 50 tickets. 1.4 tickets per day. You could suggested that her writing style is being flagged as spam because it picks up incorrect verb/noun usage. "I get what you're writing but the spam filter is what it is" 
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 03:53 |
|
|
notwithoutmyanus posted:Thread: question, for those of you who work remotely but not at a desk, do you have any variant of a laptop-desk you use? My wife was looking at the dharma desk but $250 on a laptop desk made of plywood is excessive. Honestly if you're going to be working for any length of time it is going to be worth investing in a desk.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
Wrath of the Bitch King posted:
I'll prefix this by saying Church isn't really a big thing in my country and I've only ever been once or twice for friends baptisms/other occasions. This is pretty wackadoo stuff as far as religions go isn't it? Like this isn't exactly standard is it?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:A request came in. Fantastic. My old boss liked to the story of how he accidentally printed the Windows XP test page over a few sheets of business cheques. Apparently it was quite an involved process for the accounts staff to document and dispose of them.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2016 07:24
|
|
|
MrMojok posted:If you do use the file system resource manager to constantly monitor all shares, is there an appreciable performance hit? I've used it for about two years now and I haven't noticed any appreciable difference. I'd add that it may be a good idea to blanket ban executable files on (most) of your company network shares (FSRM can do this). When you think about it there is very little reason to have executable files stored on your general drive. The way I usually do it is to have a central location of installers that are excluded from the exe ban in FSRM, otherwise I'll get an email if someone attempts to add an exe to a network share and the file copy is blocked. I implemented this because cryptolocker/variants at the time was replacing each file with a self extracting exe of the actual file, so a lot of users would get infected before someone noticed something was up. It has served me well. My Cryptolocker defense has worked well so far but it's not available for everyone. I use Applocker to whitelist all the executables that can run on my workstations. I'm lucky because we have Win 7 Enterprise. This was reasonably time consuming but not exactly impossible, it took me about a week all up. My method was basically to go through and create the rules for all the applications I knew were running in the organisation. Then I enabled Testing/Auditing of the rules.After a week I gathered the event logs off the workstations and polished off my ruleset based on the applications that would have been prevented from running. I've also configured FSRM to block executable files from being copied to most network shares. Obviously there is the mail filtering and AV. I've configured my mail filtering to block all executables and scripts (vbs,cmd,bat etc) and zip files that contain them. I've also blocked file extensions that should rarely, if ever, be sent via email. Stuff like .dot files and .rtf, this is very organisation specific but you get the idea. Before mail even hits my server each host is verified against the spamhaus zen blocklist, which cuts down on spam by about 90-95% for us. Stuff I'd like to do in the future: - Figure out a way to have a host blocked if I get too many infected files from it. - Block emails from (most) other countries domains. My organisations very rarely need to talk to Brazil for example.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
We've just got a bunch of HP ProLiant 650 G2s in and they all came with a 256GB NVMe SSD. Wonderful! Finally the employees here can get some access speeds. However I've since found out that these SSDs require hotfixes to be applied before WIndows 7 x64 will boot without bluescreening. So now I'm spending my day loving around with my previously rock solid MDT Tasks and Images to get these laptops running. Almost 10 hours of tinkering and I'm not really any closer than I was. What kind of workaround is this HP? http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c05040446
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 03:53 |
|
|
anthonypants posted:You're complaining that Windows 7 doesn't support NVMe out of the box, because the standard was created well after Windows 7 was released, and that you have to download a hotfix provided by Microsoft and slipstream it into the install wim. I'm more complaining that the hotfix doesn't seem to work.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 08:00
|
|