|
Lum posted:Any others? Movey and the game of musical offices?
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2013 18:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 6, 2024 16:49 |
|
|
frogbert posted:My problem with this is that disabling UAC doesn't do anything. It effectively just automatically clicks "no" on each UAC prompt. You don't get any more permissions, stuff just fails silently. Typically disabling UAC goes hand-in-hand with local admin access, so it effectively grants apps the same open access they'd have had on a default XP setup. There's no excuse for it these days, anything that hasn't been updated in years obviously isn't changing or likely supported, so it shouldn't be hard to determine what specific permissions it actually needs and grant those instead. Anything still under active development which requires or even recommends that UAC be disabled on the other hand is simply a steaming pile of incompetence, from those developing it to those refusing to replace it with something else and sometimes those in IT who aren't properly explaining why its inexcusably bad and should not be allowed to continue.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2013 05:52
|
|
|
I wonder why the Kaspersky server stopped working...
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2015 18:41
|
|