|
dukeku posted:Looks like you just didn't finish fully bleaching the backing off (let it sit for a while, it won't hurt if your tape is on right) and had bleach leak under your tape on the top. I gave it another shot with a different photo. I let the bleach sit for a good while this time. When I hold the negative up to the light I can see different colors in the image (reds, blues), but after scanning and inverting it came out sort of monochrome. I messed around with the curves for awhile and couldn't make it look right. My best guess is that my scanner just sucks - it's some cheap HP all-in-one deal.  scan0006 by LargeHadron, on Flickr e: Yeah, it's the scanner. I snapped it with my phone and it's got tons of color in it.  scan0007 by LargeHadron, on Flickr LargeHadron fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Feb 11, 2014 |
#
?
Feb 11, 2014 22:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 18:57 |
|
|
Instax film does not like cold weather.    Last shot from my dead ColorPack II. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2014 21:16
|
|
|
Speaking of cold weather, I've not shot my 210 any since I got the film because it's been sub-30F. I know the film says it doesn't work well under 40f, but can I compensate for that by letting it sit even longer, or should I throw it somewhere warm until it develops?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2014 21:42
|
|
|
Elliotw2 posted:Speaking of cold weather, I've not shot my 210 any since I got the film because it's been sub-30F. I know the film says it doesn't work well under 40f, but can I compensate for that by letting it sit even longer, or should I throw it somewhere warm until it develops? Those I just posted were shot in -20 or so windchill. Sit longer? It comes out and develops on its own. I took the photos and then threw them in my pack and didn't look at them until we got to the bar at the ski resort. Oh - are you talking about a Polaroid Land Camera 210? If so then just put them in your coat or bag and then let them sit for a bit when you get home then peel apart after it warms up. Whitezombi fucked around with this message at 21:53 on Feb 13, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2014 21:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2014 09:08
|
|
|
 Untitled by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2014 03:25
|
|
|
My Fuji PA145 back has shipped from Japan, soon I will be shooting pack film on a real camera.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2014 06:19
|
|
|
 Limoncello by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr Behind the scenes - Chamonix at full extension:  8th-snype posted:My Fuji PA145 back has shipped from Japan, soon I will be shooting pack film on a real camera. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2014 21:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 20:42
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:Behind the scenes - Chamonix at full extension: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
 _DSC5671 by Stingray of Doom, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2014 12:18
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2014 09:43
|
|
|
You've been killing it lately.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2014 15:14
|
|
|
Niiiiiiiice
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2014 17:10
|
|
|
Mmm, Ifi. My favorite fi!
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2014 18:28
|
|
|
drat dude. Took my 600 SE out for a test run yesterday. Love this camera.    
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2014 18:48
|
|
|
Dang.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
Am I missing something here? Wasn't Fuji Instant 4x5 killed a while ago: http://www.lomography.com/magazine/news/2014/02/24/fujifilms-fp-100c-45-peel-apart-film-to-be-discontinued
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2014 23:04
|
|
|
Yes it was.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2014 23:06
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Am I missing something here? Wasn't Fuji Instant 4x5 killed a while ago: It's still possible to use a back that takes the standard 4.25"x3.25" peel-apart film.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Am I missing something here? Wasn't Fuji Instant 4x5 killed a while ago: I might be misinterpreting it, but I think this is just a "we're gonna run out of existing stocks really soon" message.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 00:26
|
|
|
Expired instant film is the devil. 5 shots from this pack came out separated and I got nothing. Everything else is purple/magenta and really fubar exposures.  This building is green.  This is on good film. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2014 07:35
|
|
|
Fuuuuuuuck
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2014 09:04
|
|
|
At this point in our sample size, "Motel" in your instant photograph = automatic winner.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2014 15:14
|
|
|
It looks like a movie poster. Just need to slap some credits and fine print on the bottom. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2014 15:46
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2014 16:43
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2014 16:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2014 07:05
|
|
|
This guy is Bland and Average. We got yelled at for taking pics of this car.  This pink stripe on the left seems to happen when you do not peel the print for many hours.  CU-5 Polaroid. Multiple exposures. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2014 18:28
|
|
|
Looks like the guys working on their own 4x5 instant film are ready to crank it up, here's their kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/bobcrowley/new55-film
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Looks like the guys working on their own 4x5 instant film are ready to crank it up, here's their kickstarter: Old Type 55 rules (when you can get the massively expired sheets to work) and it looks like New55 has the potential to be even better (higher ISO, same ISO for positive and negative). Here's some old Type 55 I did before this thread existed.  
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
I was really impressed with the images they've already made with their prototypes, they're getting a great tonal range and what looks to be fine grain (I'm guessing you can call it that in instant film). Looks to be a lot more impressive than the garbage coming out of Impossible.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2014 23:17
|
|
|
The new type 55 project seems to be still in very early stage, so I am wary giving them any of my money. But if they could make it work, it would be fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2014 05:49
|
|
|
   I'm trying to decide if I should buy the back and try to do the 600SE conversion myself OR throw money at Option8 when he decides to sell them. This is where to get it. http://shop.lomography.com/us/belair-instant-back It's an Instax Wide back for a Belair X 6-12 camera. The Belair camera is pretty lovely from what I read, so shooting with it is not an option.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2014 17:41
|
|
|
That 4x5 Instax back looks pretty sweet, I'd be pretty interested if it's not at eye-watering prices.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2014 04:30
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2014 18:12
|
|
|
 scan0005 by LargeHadron, on Flickr scan0001_a by LargeHadron, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
     
bellows lugosi fucked around with this message at 07:23 on Apr 23, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 06:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 18:57 |
|
|
Crossposting from landscapes because 1) I really like this photo, and 2) this thread hasn't been seeing much love lately. scan0001 by LargeHadron, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2014 22:16
|
|