|
Stoph posted:You need both. JavaScript frameworks don't replace Rails/Django, they replace jQuery spaghetti. Your application is not less secure because you organize your client side code better.
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2013 18:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 22:23 |
|
JSON is normally sent gziped.
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2013 15:10 |
|
No. It's just a GUI for all the same things that people usually use with grunt.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2013 18:18 |
|
Grunt doesn't really have anything to do with programming with node.js. It happens to use node, but unless you're modifying Grunt itself that's mostly irrelevant.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2014 04:00 |
|
fletcher posted:That sounds pretty interesting, do you have a link to it? http://www.gwern.net/Google%20shutdowns His entire site is fascinating analyses of things that I would never have thought would be interesting to analyze before reading them.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2014 01:45 |
|
Debian packaging is easy. Step 1: write some code that people want to use. Step 2: let them deal with packaging it for Debian.
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2014 04:48 |
|
abraham linksys posted:I don't understand why this decision was made, other than to actively gently caress with new coders That's why. They want to remove arguments entirely, but to avoid breaking bc are only doing so for functions defined using the new syntax, and binding the parent context's arguments is what would happen if it was just a normal variable in the containing scope.
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2015 02:00 |
|
HaB posted:I would argue that it's a poor interview question, though - because it doesn't really address anything real-world. Knowing how this works is pretty important for writing real-world JS in any way other than changing random poo poo until your code appears to work.
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2015 02:02 |
|
https://www.npmjs.com/package/flatten-packages may be helpful.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2015 14:51 |
|
PhantomJS gives you an actual browser engine so that you can test code that does stuff like DOM manipulation without mocking it or using a fake that may not behave like the real thing, but it adds a bunch of overhead and ideally most of your tests shouldn't need that. Broadly speaking you should run unit tests on node, and integration tests on PhantomJS.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2015 16:30 |
|
When I last used it, PhantomJS had a very noticeable startup time (like 10+ seconds). That was about two years ago though, so if that's been fixed I'd just use it for everything.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2015 19:27 |
|
VMWare generally performs significantly better than VirtualBox.
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2015 22:26 |
|
It's very easy to make bootstrap not look like bootstrap, but of course you never notice that those sites are using bootstrap unless you're actively digging into the source.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2015 03:06 |
|
Thermopyle posted:The best tutorials are usually the ones written by someone who just figured out what they're talking about.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 16:56 |
|
I have found that literally everything which involves separating concerns will be described by someone as "basically just MVC" even if there aren't even three general kinds of things involved.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2015 03:32 |
|
spacebard posted:It worked for them For very generous definitions of "worked". I don't know how you build a site that spend 10-20 seconds as a broken mess while widgets pop in one-by-one and then decide that it's shippable.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2016 17:35 |
|
n4 posted:My question is this: is it worthwhile to put a lot of work into a past project? Now that I'm employed and have experience on my resume (also will have a site to add to my portfolio from this job), I just wonder how much it will help the next time I'm interviewing. You'll want to update it occasionally, though, before you get to the point of showing off something built around jQuery in 2016.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2016 23:56 |
|
There's an argument that the BSD license has an implied patent grant (as otherwise it doesn't actually grant you any of the rights it claims to), and that an explicit license grant would replace the implied one, rather than adding to it. No part of this argument has in any way been tested in court, though. The older wording of the patent grant was really lovely and far more broad than it was supposed to be, but the new wording is basically the same as Apache 2.0 and no one has a problem with that.
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2016 01:33 |
|
Plavski posted:I thought Mongo was the new hotness tho? The Mongo is Web Scale video is 6 years old.
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2016 01:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 22:23 |
|
Summit posted:Nobody should really be saying "Angular 4" much like nobody says "React 15" (current version, since they also do semver). I'll admit Angular team has handled this situation very poorly but the piling on about version numbers is pretty silly. The difference is that there is not a completely different thing named React 1 which people use and you need to distinguish it from.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2017 18:50 |