|
It looks like there's a version of this on OCTGN: http://octgn.gamersjudgement.com/wordpress/pathfinder/ I haven't had a chance to try it out yet.
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2014 18:22 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 10:57 |
|
I finally got the OCTGN version installed after having to mess around with updating .NET Framework. I noticed the module doesn't have all the information on the cards, so you either have to have the physical cards on hand or you need to scan each card and replace the default images with your scans. Having to constantly look up the card information is inefficient, so I think scanning is the best option. Has anyone already done this? Would anyone be interested in pitching in on this? The author of the module said his scans are at 200 dpi (about 500 x 700 pixels).
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2014 16:07 |
|
malkav11 posted:Generally that sort of thing is done to avoid cease and desists by making sure you have to have your physical copy on hand to play. I don't suppose anyone could fault you for scanning your own copy and playing with those, but distributing them would essentially be . In lieu of , it would still be better if we had something like what was posted above just because we wouldn't have to constantly look up cards:
|
# ¿ Jan 8, 2014 16:58 |
|
What's the optimal number of characters to use? I usually play solo or with my wife. We've been using 4 characters between us, and it seems like it might be not enough turns to go through for each character to get a good feel for how they play. 1 or 2 characters don't seem like they're enough. They get too many turns and there aren't a large variety of locations. I'm wondering if 3 might be good. Anyone have thoughts on this?
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2014 20:05 |
|
A couple of months ago, at BGG.con, Paizo hosted a 60 hour marathon session of PACG which included going through all the adventures including ones that haven't been released yet. Here's a report on that: http://paizo.com/paizo/blog/v5748dyo5lfrv?The-Battles-of-Marathon-The-Pathfinder-ACG-at Holy poo poo the later adventures sound really hard.
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2014 13:31 |