|
Reiterpallasch posted:My Dorkfood came in earlier this week, and I ended up attempting steak--a NY strip, at 130 degrees for a hour. It came out good, but I had trouble putting a good sear on it with only a minute on each side in my cast iron skillet. I ended up giving it a little more time to develop a crust, and that ended up bringing more gray into the steaks than I really care for. Does anyone have any tips for developing a crust, fast? Dry it more, make sure the pan has a thin layer of neutral oil in it and is pretty hot.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2013 19:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 23:23 |
|
DeeMurf posted:Another question: Does it matter if the meat/fish is frozen when I vacuum-seal it up with butter, spice and goodies? I'm thinking it shouldn't as long as the cook time is long enough, right? Your food has to get up to temp within 4 hours. You can't cook large things from frozen as safely. .Z. posted:Food safety question. 140's kind of a weird temp. I'd just pitch those.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2013 03:46 |
|
NoDamage posted:Got my Anova on Friday. For $200 I'm impressed, it feels very well made. If you put pepper on your steak before you sear it at crazy hot heat, it's just going to burn the pepper.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2013 23:14 |
|
PurpleLizardWizard posted:Thanks for the tip. I wasn't aware of those. Do this: http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/08/11/infusion-profusion-game-changing-fast-%E2%80%98n-cheap-technique/
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2013 22:15 |
|
Safety Dance posted:Question: Did you chill it in an ice bath properly after cooking it before putting it in the fridge?
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2013 02:58 |
|
nwin posted:So I roasted a chicken tonight and was thinking...what about sous vide whole chicken? Legs and breasts cooked the same temp. Only problem is it would have the texture of crock pot chicken and no crispy skin. To correct that, either a torch or dry it off and throw it under the broiler for a bit maybe? You have to break it down, you need good thermal contact. Technically I guess you could just fill the bag with enough fat to heat everything, but you can't just vac seal a whole chicken and dump it in there with empty space.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2013 03:00 |
|
BraveUlysses posted:I cooked up an extra boneless, skinless chicken breast last night, 2.5h @ 143* F. Hit the water with a thermometer.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2013 18:23 |
|
Evi|Sycho posted:I recently impulse-purchased a Sous Vide Supreme Demi without doing my research and now am wondering if I should have gone with the Anova. I'm in a small apartment kitchen and between the footprint, cost and lack of circulation I'm wondering if I wouldn't be better off with the Anova. Cost isn't a huge factor but I'm having trouble seeing what benefits there are to the SVS for the extra cost? I have had a SVS (the big model) since it came out, and if I could trade it for an Anova I would do it in a second.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2013 02:10 |
|
a foolish pianist posted:It looks like the single, molded plastic housing is pretty key to the patent, so maybe not? It is pretty ridiculous that 'put well known technology inside a plastic shell' is patentable. That's not how patents work. What is claimed to be infringed is the following combination, in light of the specification and a lot of other stuff. There is no mention of which claim is infringed, so let's just go with the broadest one. quote:1. A constant temperature circulator for maintaining a liquid at a constant temperature including If this goes to a jury trial, there is almost literally no way to guess what will happen. It's possible to submit prior art and to request that the patent be re-examined in the meantime, too, which takes a long time. EAT THE EGGS RICOLA fucked around with this message at 06:09 on Dec 13, 2013 |
# ¿ Dec 13, 2013 06:05 |
|
To anyone who picked up an Anova outside of the US, how long did it take for it to ship? I got one for my brother for Christmas and he won't have it by then, but it would be nice to have a general idea of when he'll get it.
|
# ¿ Dec 23, 2013 16:05 |
|
Try 130ish for 4 hours, with a cut like ribeye you need to give it time to deal with the connective tissue if you're going to do it closer to 130.
|
# ¿ Dec 24, 2013 19:07 |
|
No Wave posted:134 is perfect for me... Ribeye is way better a little warmer because the fat gets gooey. 130 is high enough to goo-ify the fat, it just takes way longer at that temp than a few degrees higher.
|
# ¿ Dec 24, 2013 20:24 |
|
DeeMurf posted:Bought a Polyscience puddlewarmer for my dad for christmas - Great success! Now I can't wait for the guy to figure out how to use it properly. And, with that in mind... Look up a practical guide to sous vide cooking by baldwin
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2013 14:01 |
|
VERTiG0 posted:When you guys are doing steaks in the puddle then searing them afterward, if you're aiming for an internal target temp of 135, wouldn't it be wise to sous-vide them to 130 and then sear? Surely the internal temp would raise at least a few degrees with the quick finishing sear, no? If you dry the steak very well and sear it in an extremely hot pan with lots of oil, then only the area immediately next to the outside of the steak will have time to overcook.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2014 15:31 |
|
dotster posted:Why so hot, I have a brisket that I was going to do this weekend and have shredded beef and some sliced and was only planning on doing 145-150F/48hrs. At those temps the meat still looks "done", no red, and is nice and juicy. I have seen recipes at 170F+ and am just trying to figure out what that gets me other than maybe dryer meat? It gets you meat that has been braised/confited using a very small amount of fat (duck fat is super expensive) or braising liquid. You can't replicate that texture at 145-150F.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2014 22:54 |
|
Phanatic posted:I just pulled the trigger on the Anova unit. The only thing I've ever had a bag break (twice) is when I tried to make trotter gear sous-vide.
|
# ¿ Jan 15, 2014 16:12 |
|
granpa yum posted:Why don't buy a sous vide supreme? I get that there are better and cheaper alternatives now but I have one from before that was the case and am generally happy with it .Z. posted:How long did that take to start happening? I've had mine for half a year and have yet to see that occur yet.
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2014 18:55 |
|
Womens Jeans posted:I just sous vided a steak for 72 hours at 52.5C/126.5F, except it didn't seem to work out very well. Instead of tasting like a delicious soft juicy steak (like it did when I cooked it for 6 hours at 52.5C) it tasted a lot more like my steak that I did for 24 hours at 62C/143F. That is, much more like a potroast. What cut of meat did you use?
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2014 15:05 |
|
Heran Bago posted:Any good vegetarian sous vide applications? I know that meat is kind of the whole point but maybe it could make something veggie easier. I know that a big bag of veggies basically turns into steamed veggies and a bag full of juice that makes good veggie stock. All root vegetables are good, basically all green things are terrible if you're not making a sauce-type thing. You can make really good roasted-style potatoes by taking some fingerlings, cooking them s-v in butter or duck fat or any fat at ~ 183F then drying and pan-searing then tossing with the bag liquid. This potato puree is super good:
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2014 22:08 |
|
Tacier posted:The Sous Vide Supreme is on sale for $200. I hadn't previously considered one and was planning on picking up an immersion circulator soon. Is there any compelling reason to buy the Supreme over something like the Anova now that they're the same price? I have a sous vide supreme, and it has served me very well over the years, but get the Anova instead.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2014 03:24 |
|
No Wave posted:Anyone have any favorite offal they like sous-vide? I'm on a kick. Have had some 145 degree calf liver (good), 140 for 11 hours lamb kidney (better!). Sweetbreads are the next obvious choice, I guess... any others? Make trotter gear sous-vide. Heart is also very, very good sous-vide.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2014 03:32 |
|
No Wave posted:eFor trotter gear if I do it I'll probably just use this recipe: http://www.seriouseats.com/recipes/2011/03/recipe-for-a-healthy-jar-of-trotter-gear.html?ref=excerpt_readmore Do it at 135 or so instead and then deep fry it to puff the skin and slice the gelatinous trotter.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2014 04:04 |
|
Hed posted:I just dry them and sear in a hot pan with melted butter. I usually cook 6-8 on Sundays to make for our lunches during the week. Use oil instead of butter, it will give it a much better sear. If you want to add butter, finish with it instead.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2014 04:20 |
|
No Wave posted:There's no reason to do this. The smoke point of the olive oil doesn't change. Yeah, that's an urban legend, I've heard it lots of times before. It will smoke less than pure low-smoke-point oil will, but it'll still burn.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2014 21:04 |
|
Ultimate Mango posted:This leads us to the next logical question: sure, but why bother? just spend 60 seconds with a double boiler.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2014 22:23 |
|
Hed posted:Ok, I used to use grapeseed oil so I could just do stupid high heat but I find that I don't get that ~nice brown sear~ as much. Even if it's due to dirty burnt milk solids I think it made a more appealing-looking product. Any ideas for how to get this with oil? Just do it at medium-high heat, no need for stupid high heat.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2014 02:01 |
|
Ultimate Mango posted:So go from puddle to ice bath in the bag, chill for a bit and then sear in rocket hot pan for as short as possible to get crust? Medium-high heat is better than too-hot. I don't bother chilling, just dry well and don't use a meat that is too thin.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2014 02:47 |
|
ShadowCatboy posted:Okay rather silly question: Anyone know if I can sous vide a steak and take it on a transatlantic flight? Only if they are containers of 100ml or less
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2014 22:57 |
|
That temp is honestly kind of low just in terms of deliciousness (your article explicitly mentions it too), but ignoring that: 120F is basically just on the line where bacteria stops thriving. You did not cook it at that temperature long enough to pasteurize it. The entire time it was under 120F, bacteria was breeding. Then you (presumably) cooled the steak in a manner that did not bring it outside of the cold side of the ~danger zone~ quickly. So you have a steak that you heated up to grow bacteria, did not pasteurize, then cooled down in a manner that encouraged bacterial growth, then want to do it again. Heating a raw steak to 120F and then eating it is way less likely to make you sick than four cycles (2x heat then chill) of being in the food safety bad zone. That said, you would probably not have gotten sick if you had done it, it's just really bad to sous-vide things with bad technique if you don't understand the food safety implications. You should look at Baldwin's Practical Guide to Sous-Vide Cooking (free online) if you want more information about how to be safe.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2014 21:47 |
|
a foolish pianist posted:This week, I'm trying out a 48 hour/135 degree tritip roast. 8 hours makes for a nice medium rare, but I'm hoping this longer time will make it really tender. That's kind of a waste, tritip is already lean and will not benefit from being cooked for that long.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2014 21:48 |
|
Ultimate Mango posted:Steaks were great. Perfectly cooked edge to edge, great crust with the torch, but set off the smoke detectors three times while torching. quote:The potatoes were a challenge... I couldn't get them through the food mill (ricer) and ended up with maybe a quarter raced and a quarter mashed and an interesting texture. I should have just used the food processor to make the purée. Or a larger die on the food mill. Tasted good though. Don't use a food processor to mash potatoes, you'll develop the gluten in them so much that it'll be like eating glue.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2014 06:54 |
|
Random Hero posted:What torch did you use? seriously torches are ridiculous compared to just using a pan with oil
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2014 16:53 |
|
Someone go find an article about this on Natural News so we can have a definitive answer.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2014 16:53 |
|
Falcon2001 posted:Just got my sansaire, first time messing around with sous vide and my fiancee is all freaked out about it. She's a protein specialist and grows bacteria for a living, so I guess I'm just going to dig into the science of it and just prove it's safe that way. Here you go for an intro to the safety part of it
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2014 18:49 |
|
55C/120F is the hottest that residential tap water is permitted to be here, legally.
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2014 21:19 |
|
Chemmy posted:55C is 131F. Sorry, I meant 49C.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2014 01:30 |
|
deimos posted:Pretty sure SubG is saying you two are not doing it right, if the ribeye is normal american thickness (euros tend to do thinner steaks) of 1-1.5" you are not pasteurising your food and might as well not loving cook it. What. You don't need to pasteurize it if you're only cooking it like that for a couple hours.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 16:08 |
|
SlayVus posted:Bacteria don't just live on the outside, they live on the inside of the meat. When spoiling bacteria become active, it doesn't matter whether you're meat is cooked or no it has already started to spoil. This is not appreciably true in beef. quote:You're not just cooking the outside of the meat when you stick in the water bath for 5-6 hours. You're pasteurizing the WHOLE product. We're not talking about a 5-6h cook, we're talking about a short-term one where pasteurization is not necessary.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 16:35 |
|
This is a legit concern. If previous slow cooker threads and general goon hygiene are any indication, someone in one of these threads is going to do something really stupid and get super sick since food safety is way more of a concern when you're cooking something for 24+ hours at a time at temperatures that approach the optimal bacterial growth range. (not to mention that if you're feeding a child or someone that is immunocompromised you should really make sure you're not going to gently caress it up.)
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 20:19 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 23:23 |
|
a foolish pianist posted:Does anyone go for long cooking times below 130? I gave it try once, but tossed the result, and I've never really seen anyone encourage that sort of thing here. Definitely never seen anyone do anything around 110. we get people asking if it's okay to throw a whole frozen chicken into a slow cooker in the other thread. it's worth making sure that it's clear what is okay and not okay to do. hell there was that guy that wanted to keep a burger in a ziploc bag in his puddle at all times, just in case he wanted a burger with 5 minutes notice. gross goonness/laziness knows no bounds.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 20:29 |