|
Grand Prize Winner posted:That thing about perceived insult resulting in direct violence reminds me of some people I've known. Most of them are ex-boxers or some other kind of athlete, a few are punk rockers, and one is low level associated with some gang. They were all ready to go at the slightest hint of an insult. Most of 'em did time as a result, but it seems like those guys would blend happily into one of your regiments. edit: you don't have to threaten to hurt people though, you can just sue 'em and spend all your time in court. schutze and steter got into one fight on their way back from court to settle a previous fight so the 21st century transplant to one of my regiments could keep honor intact without having to murder his comrades. edit 2: those dudes might end up doing time at the Provost's or something--just because these guys fight one another all the time doesn't mean the officers have to like it, it's a huge hassle when their soldiers kill one another instead of whoever it is they're payed to kill HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 21:01 on Jul 26, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 20:20 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 13:03 |
|
Grenrow posted:When I was doing 19th century British swordsmanship research, I found some articles in newspapers and magazines complaining about how no one dueled with swords any more and that fewer stabbings were contributing to the Moral Decline of the Youth. I love that people complaining about the kids these days haven't changed a bit since centuries. Now they use lovely jpgs on facebook instead of florid Victorian prose to whine, though. is england the outlier?
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 20:52 |
|
my friend, you need to google mensur fighting
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 21:28 |
|
Siivola posted:They kinda are, I think. By 19th century I'm fairly sure both they and 'Muricans had already transitioned to shooting each other which conversely failed to catch on on the continent, right? HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Jul 26, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 21:30 |
|
aag
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 22:13 |
|
IM_DA_DECIDER posted:That reminds me, I remember reading a lot of Borges, and some of his stories deal with gauchos having knife duels. Anyone know stuff about that? Is it as much of a myth as cowboy gun duels? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fac%C3%B3n
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 22:41 |
|
EvanSchenck posted:It makes sense. The War Nerd aka "Gary Brecher" is a pseudonym for the writer John Dolan, who happens to be one of those Irish-Americans who are still obsessively Anglophobic. I suspect his explanation of the 30YW: the only non-anti-Imperialist-biased anglophone historian, if he counts as a historian (actually peter wilson is admirably evenhanded. gg.) edit: also irl his ancestors, unless they belonged to a Spanish escuadron, might have found themselves in the Swedish army right alongside a whole lot of English and Scots. But those guys were less bigoted than we are, most of the time. (I just read a letter where someone gets mad at Piccolomini for insulting Germans lol) edit 2: He's wrong, but it is a welcome change from "Only Protestants or people from Northern Europe can have good ideas." HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 08:28 on Jul 27, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 08:18 |
|
EvanSchenck posted:There was also "rough-and-tumble" aka "gouging", which was an unarmed fighting tradition supposedly peculiar to the (mostly Southern and frontier) USA in the 18th and early 19th century. It was similar to contemporary boxing except that the objective was to knock your opponent to the ground and disfigure him in some permanent way; e.g. gouge out an eye, tear off his ear or testicle, bite off his nose or finger, etc. The wikipedia article on gouging is drawn almost wholly from this actually quite fun AHR article, if you have a means of looking it up:
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 08:29 |
|
Trin Tragula posted:E.S. Thompson makes a couple of incredibly bad life decisions that HEY GAL's chaps would have been proud of....
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 08:37 |
|
Grand Prize Winner posted:Holy poo poo, you just zeroed in on why I like him. edit: meanwhile, Swedes who were more legit like Baner and Torstensson get ignored because almost nobody cares about the last third of the war edit 2: and then there's Fritz Redlich, who says Wallenstein counts as a Protestant because he was raised Bohemian Brethren and converted as a young man. Catholics who converted to a Protestant religion also count as Protestants though, because ????? HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 10:29 on Jul 27, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 09:53 |
|
TheLovablePlutonis posted:It's also a thing on a lot of places in the Latin American countryside as well. I live in Northeast Brazil and my family has several tales of people who died or got grievously wounded in those, and I actually had an uncle who died in a knife duel due to a debt of what amounts in converted value today to barely eighty dollars....
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 17:00 |
|
Disinterested posted:Wasn't there, in any event, more overwhelming public pressure for reconciliation than you might see in certain other civil wars that for example stem from more traditional causes? HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 19:00 on Jul 27, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 18:58 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:Lots of flailing and near-simultaneous hits.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 19:11 |
|
sound the jauchecharly alarm
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 22:00 |
|
if that's not him the muslim thread might know, esp if his name is spelled a bunch of misdirecting ways in our alphabet
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 22:10 |
|
more words i learned: bastand or bastant-satisfied. From basta, Italian, "enough" execution-enforcement.* In military jargon, "the enforcement of contributions." A guy who's not with the company this week because he's auf der execution is (in the best case scenario) shaking civilians down for cash and food. *not the execution of a legal punishment, to get executed is "justificieret werden" HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Jul 28, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 23:46 |
|
Squalid posted:I read a good paper on the subject of contagious dishonor/pollution amongst the vlax Roma which argued that it is probably an adaptive trait by which groups can more rigorously enforce social norms and laws.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 10:05 |
|
Xerxes17 posted:I'm going to miss it too as I'm going to Berlin tomorrow and I won't be here for when it opens on the weekend
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 10:31 |
|
Kemper Boyd posted:The concept of that there's poo poo you don't do in war was recognized at least during the 17th century, maybe even before that. I think HEY GAL had some examples. this is apropos of nothing, but speaking of "the Westphalian system" have any of you guys read the actual text of the Treaty of Westphalia? it's all about the land disputes of the Margravine-Regent of Hesse-Kassel, this woman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countess_Amalie_Elisabeth_of_Hanau-M%C3%BCnzenberg hesse-kassel and hesse-darmstadt had a war within the 30yw and Amalie Elizabeth won. due to her skillful leadership Hesse-Kassel was one of the few places to make out unambiguously well from the 30yw. (Speaking of rad nicknames, her bio is entitled The Iron Princess.) which is good for her, but is there anything more German than the two parts of a territory fighting a war within a war? is the HRE actually a fractal? what happens if Amalie-Elizabeth's living room decides to secede HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 12:22 on Jul 28, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 12:15 |
|
Disinterested posted:Hey Gal, I believe there was a vague procedure in the HRE after the TYW that allowed people to apply to the imperial court for a local power to intervene in a neighbouring state to prevent the mistreatment of subjects for confessional reasons in exchange for tax receipts, and I think it happened on a number of occasions (it's a vague recollection, it was a friend's PhD thesis). Ring a bell?
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 12:45 |
|
JaucheCharly posted:There's requisition orders preserved that tell about the process of ordering stuff and literature about how villages were organized to produce certain goods, fletching, shafts, glue and all that for being freed of taxes. Afaik this is all in turkish, possibly in Yücel's book, but good luck translating it. The process of aquiring enough feathers for an order of about 1 million arrows must have involved quite organized breeding of geese. The forging of the heads was done by gypsy villages around Edirne, which was also home of the best bowmakers in the 1600s.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 17:41 |
|
Xerxes17 posted:Hey Gal, why are all these Catholics in Prague this week going around the old down chanting, singing and yelling hallelujah? did you go to Wallenstein's schloss like i said, i've never been but the pictures are very pretty, and you can raise a beer in its direction and tell him a bunch of spergs on the internet (me) think he's cool HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 18:17 on Jul 28, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 18:11 |
|
Xerxes17 posted:... in the evening after dinner... edit: they've got a cool motto too, prague mother of cities, PRAHA MATER VRBIVM edit 2: it's such a cool motto it's in their train station HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 18:29 on Jul 28, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 18:20 |
|
my dad posted:If you've ever wanted to take part in a global money laundering and blackmailing scheme... anyway, what a terrible weekend: some other hauptmann insulted mine severely, my battalion was kept in reserve for an entire battle and did almost nothing, and when I finally managed to take a prisoner some douche killed him by accident HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 03:37 on Aug 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 02:33 |
|
I have data on Saxon regimental strength from 1618 to 1625, and then again from 1631 until 1651. I want to write an article on this, but I need a way to turn the second chunk of data into a table that isn't a billion pages long--it needs to be able to fit on two pages. But it's from 20 years, and several months from each year, so the xls document I've got all this on, if printed, would be about 30 pages long. Wat do? edit: Remember when David Parrott said all our regimental strength data for the early modern period would be vague and hopeless? turns out he was wrong :iamafag: edit 2: this is because the people who have vague bad data look at what, in German, is called a bestallung--the head of state's request for troops. Those are nowhere near the actual numbers and everyone in the 17th century knows this, that if you give a guy money for 3000 guys you'll be lucky if you get 2000, and that's before they all get sick or desert. Parrott has some humorous quotes from Richelieu on the topic. I look at actual muster rolls/pre-battle counts of dudes/reports about quartering, usually produced by the musterschreibers or colonels themselves, or copies of those documents. (Also documents for internal consumption are unlikely to share the...strategic inaccuracies that documents you send to the people employing you are full of. If you're overcharging the Elector Of Whatever you send him bad muster rolls, but if you want to know how well you can fight you pay attention to the good ones and update that information every time that number changes.) HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 11:23 on Aug 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 10:16 |
|
Xerxes17, I'm kicking myself that I forgot to tell you this, and then I was at a reenactment all weekend, but Pappenheim is also buried in Prague. You should visit his tomb the next time you're there, leave a pistol and a shot glass full of something potent on it Edit: Here it is. https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bazilika_Nanebevzet%C3%AD_Panny_Marie_(Strahov) He's buried beside an empty tomb, in which he wanted Wallenstein to eventually be buried. Everything I learn about their relationship is adorable as heck. HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 11:33 on Aug 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 11:03 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 13:03 |
|
feedmegin posted:I think you might need to be more precise about what you have and what you want out of it... OK: here is a screenshot from what I am working on right now. This is Saxon cavalry, 1636. (Red means "catastrophe." These guys got savaged at the battle of Wittstock) There are several months in 1636 that I have data for; within those months the data was generated on certain days--for instance, on 10 Aug 1636 the first company in this list had 721 horses in it, and on 12 Sept it had 855. (That means approximately that number of cavalrymen. Most cav rolls count horses with more attention than they count people.) If a cell is blank it means that I have no data for that company on that month. As you can imagine, a table that has several months for each year from 31 to 51 is really long. How do I make this more palatable, visually? HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 12:19 on Aug 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 12:02 |