|
Crows Turn Off posted:SCOTUS doesn't... so why should we? Stabbey_the_Clown posted:No. This Supreme Court has made multiple awful rulings utterly free from typical measured restraint taking into consideration constraints on "settled law," "standing," and "actual harm." They, like other Republican politicians, no longer deserve to receive the benefit of the doubt. I actually am going to ask that folks cool down on the "It's all calvinball" peanut gallery posting. This thread provokes a lot of seemingly earnest and, at least in my opinion, really engaging questions and I don't think it's interesting for a question like "how does the majority justify their ruling" to get peppered with answers like "lol, doesn't matter." I'm not asking anyone to pretend that the SC isn't highly partisan, but I don't think "the supreme court is captured, op" is going to blow the mind of anyone who posts in D&D so it probably doesn't need to be the entire content of multiple posts every page.
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2023 17:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 19:50 |
|
|
VitalSigns posted:Ah so we are moderating positions Nope, just whether a post is adding to the discussion, which I generally try to enforce pretty loosely, since this is a discussion forum and not a thesis defense, but zero content replies to earnest questions seem to hit this thread hard after major decisions.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2023 17:56
|
|
|
If you want to discuss voting and its effectiveness, take it to the electoral politics thread.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2024 14:34
|
|