Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Old Kentucky Shark
May 25, 2012

If you think you're gonna get sympathy from the shark, well then, you won't.


Fuschia tude posted:

Stringer.

Since we were talking about them on the last page, a new Thomas-Andrew lawsuit just dropped and woof

To me the wildest revelation is that a legal podcast helmed by a corporate contract lawyer only ever bothered with a verbal "50/50" agreement.

It's an example of peak Lawyer Brain that at every step in the process Andrew Torrez has apparently done the exact opposite of what he, as a lawyer, would presumably be advising his client to do.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Old Kentucky Shark
May 25, 2012

If you think you're gonna get sympathy from the shark, well then, you won't.


VitalSigns posted:

There isn't really a thre

But Arizona also has a law passed a few years ago banning abortion after 15 weeks...so how can an older law take precedence over a newer one?

The 15 week ban was written by the Republican legislature while Roe was still in effect and was specifically crafted so that it allowed more draconian abortion bans to take precedent over it: its a pro-life backstop in case the 1864 law is declared unconstitutional.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply