|
Charlz Guybon posted:We've known this since the 2008 Death Penalty case.
|
#
¿
May 23, 2023 09:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 20:20 |
|
|
OddObserver posted:Aren't you normally not supposed to be able to sue based on a hypothetical?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2023 03:20
|
|
|
Petey posted:You’re acting like this Court cares about standing, though. It’s a fiction in both 303 Creative and student loan case. The fact that the webmaster ask in 303 creative was purely hypothetical was acknowledged in the oral arguments! Everyone has known it this entire time! It was the very first question! SCOTUS itself? Whether SCOTUS cares depends on how the wind is blowing and how many of the justices want to use that case as a vehicle to decide on something. I'm not going to pretend I'm watching every SCOTUS case but I vaguely recall some of the cases I looked at regarding mootness, the standard isn't really that strict and it depends on whether the justices are chomping on the bit or not to take the case. (as usual to note though: I'm not a lawyer) BeAuMaN fucked around with this message at 05:15 on Jun 30, 2023 |
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2023 05:02
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:With the SCOTUS agreeing to take up the abortion pill case I wonder how much of it is Roberts screaming at the conservatives to rule mostly/entirely in favor of the FDA unless they want to ensure Dem turnout jumps in November like it did when they issued the Dobbs ruling.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2024 23:43
|
|