SCOTUS 2023: Rice pilaf from Louisiana...is that like an ISIS video?

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > SCOTUS 2023: Rice pilaf from Louisiana...is that like an ISIS video?

«‹›3 »

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Potato Salad posted:

What the absolute gently caress?

... covid derangement? Chemo brain?

The knowledge that he can do and say whatever he wants and will never ever face consequences for it.

He's been getting more blatant now that it's 6-3.

# ¿ Dec 5, 2022 22:35

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 21, 2024 03:59

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

somebody please write a snarky breakdown of the current justices i beg of you

# ¿ Jan 20, 2023 22:17

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

CmdrRiker posted:

Gotchu.

They all suck and I hate them. They are tearing this country apart and they don't care because they'll all be dead before climate change kills 90% of us.

CmdrRiker hates them goddammit.

You're welcome.

Thank you and god bless

# ¿ Jan 23, 2023 18:37

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Pook Good Mook posted:

Gorsuch is the only "originalist" ever who actually believes the nonsense.

You think Thomas doesn't?

I'd say that Gorsuch is a True Believer libertarian, but Thomas is a True Believer originalist.

# ¿ Jan 26, 2023 19:13

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

I don't disagree that originalism is stupid as hell, but I do believe that Thomas earnestly believes in his flavor of originalism, while I believe the others understand it's a fig leaf for being a supervillian.

# ¿ Jan 26, 2023 21:15

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

eSports Chaebol posted:

qv all the early gun regulations post 2nd Amendment that just don�t count as examples of early gun regulations because

Well if you take the Dobbs approach and go back to pre-constitution English common law, you find.....oops they also had gun regulations and those don't count either because

# ¿ Jan 26, 2023 22:16

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Ogmius815 posted:

When you meet an �originalist� ask him (it�s almost definitely �him�) if Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided. He�ll say yes (if he says no you can just laugh and point and walk away). Then ask how that decision can be squared with the �original public meaning� of the fourteenth amendment given that the very congress that voted for that amendment was itself in charge of a segregated school system in the District of Columbia.

�and that�s pretty much it for originalism.

Great point, but the mistake here is thinking that that originalists are consistent, or that they'll be intelligent enough to get tripped up by a clear own on their ideals.

# ¿ Jan 28, 2023 00:43

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Murgos posted:

It�s not a result that the court can grant though. The constitution gives the executive branch the power to see that the nations laws are upheld.

The FDA is a natural extension of that authority.

The courts can not countermand another branch of government�s constitutional authority because those are both equal levels of authority, that�s separation of powers.

The court would have to say congress doesn�t have the power to pass the laws that say that food and drugs are regulated. This would be the equivalent of saying that congress can not regulate interstate trade which is a power expressly granted to it in the constitution.

I don�t think any of this is plausible.

Literally they just ruled that a constitutional right of privacy doesn't exist because of 16th century dudes existing, and that undercuts like half the bill of rights.

The mask is off plausible doesn't really matter.

# ¿ Feb 7, 2023 23:56

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Sundae posted:

That's why this is so insane to me. Congress explicitly established the FDA.

Also the Voting Rights Act and welp.

# ¿ Feb 8, 2023 00:00

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Alito is the least surprising dissent on there, even beyond Thomas.

# ¿ Apr 6, 2023 21:19

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

OddObserver posted:

No, the math just says that at least one justice handles more than one Circuit; that each justice covers at least one is a matter of not being silly with assignments.

Seems like we should increase the court to 13, so as to be sure we're not overworking our poor justices.

# ¿ Apr 22, 2023 05:00

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Vahakyla posted:

IANAL but Roberts' argument isn't that much of a pants-on-head. He's right about the fact that "why?". He doesn't answer to the congress, so being summoned by them is weird.

Any citizen can be summoned by congress I assume. He's just making it clear he's above that.

# ¿ Apr 26, 2023 07:32

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

virtualboyCOLOR posted:

If a single election is able to do this much then maybe it�s worth dispensing the indefensible judicial system.

It does sound like "vote!" is a sound strategy though, possibly even "vote blue no matter who"

# ¿ May 1, 2023 23:58

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Bel Shazar posted:

Necessary, but not sufficient

Never said it was sufficient.

# ¿ May 2, 2023 00:19

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

VitalSigns posted:

We did! You want me to vote now? For what?

Apparently so the Dems don't lose a state SC and get gerrymandered out of existence

# ¿ May 2, 2023 21:55

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Oh we debating which racially loaded term to call a black man in this thread?

# ¿ Sep 26, 2023 19:40

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 21, 2024 03:59

Jaxyon: Mar 7, 2016; I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

The court declined to see a case where a BLM organizer was held responsible for the injuries on a police officer because they organized a protest.

How does this remotely make sense?

# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 18:32

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > SCOTUS 2023: Rice pilaf from Louisiana...is that like an ISIS video?

«‹›3 »