|
Evil Fluffy posted:If Trump doesn't burn down the country over the next 4-8 years he's all but guaranteed to leave office with a net worth greater than even his highest previous claims. I hope he's so unpopular that the next president campaigns with a "lock him up" plank and actually follows through with it.
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 12:37 |
|
|
It'd be nice for the Democrats to at least try, though.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
Hopefully someone more reputable will try and get in touch with the dude they got the yearbook photos from.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2017 06:22
|
|
|
Ron Jeremy posted:In one fell swoop, all federal attorneys are replaced by the liberty university law school class of 2016. Staffing the DOJ full of inexperienced liberty university grads seems like it'd be a good thing for everyone that isn't in the administration.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
A dem lost a special election in a trump 30+ district by like 5 points last week, 2018 is definitely on the table.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:Yes well known political moderate Mike Pence will not just find a bunch of Alito clones. lmao if you think Mike Pence is getting anything done in a world where Trump is successfully impeached. he'll be the lamest duck to ever duck
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2017 06:26
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:In what loving universe would a Republican controlled Congress get a supermajority to impeach Trump? The universe where Trump got elected president in the first place?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:The wapo article comparing him to, quote, a "front row law student" is dead on. Eurgh. It's like Scalia without even the underlying oily deviousness. Do you have a link to this?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
Fuschia tude posted:What does this mean? Even if people don't like it, SCOTUS rulings still have rule of law. If only their were an example in history of one of the political branches ignoring a Supreme Court ruling
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
The line of succession after VP is set by Congress. So they could always change it but obviously they wouldn't.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Imo there's no way the GOP impeaches Trump without a huge split in the party. A huge portion of the base simply won't tolerate it.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 07:13
|
|
|
Rygar201 posted:Not every GOP rep is from an R +10 district. Plenty of the guys in districts Clinton won are already getting nervous. It's not a foregone conclusion, but I certainly wouldn't table it either I know that. That doesn't mean it wouldn't piss off a substantial subset of the party.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:Primary and secondary schools have a lot more power to control what happens because it's a closed campus with a set schedule and the students are minors. Courts usually rule in favor of the least restriction as is practical. uh what college did you go to where it’s hard to draw a line between posters literally telling lgbt students to kill themselves and the normal goings on of a college campus?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Double Punctuation posted:I really hope the Apple thing goes somewhere. Among other things, they have been using their monopoly to attempt to force everyone on the Internet to use H.264/H.265, because they get paid when people use them.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2019 12:39
|
|
|
Glad to see my state eating poo poo in that copyright case.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2020 19:39
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:Its literally the job of a judge so like thats the answer you'd expect for them to be qualified? if that’s the expected answer of a judge we should just throw the entire profession in the garbage
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:Dont worry, america probably wont last that long Inshallah
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2021 15:18
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Boo! I guess I’m probably not allowed to post what I think the response to this decision should be. susan b buffering fucked around with this message at 05:20 on Jul 11, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2021 05:17
|
|
|
Sanguinia posted:The idea of someone losing a chance to be a SCOTUS clerk because of their dad being a high profile name and the appearance of impropriety that creates sucks, but then you need to think about the probability she only got the job in the first place because of her dad. Hereditary nepotism is bad, but its still a bummer when someone loses something through no fault of their own. She’ll be fine.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2021 02:05
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Yes. A number of them do. Your participation determines the degree to which they wind up exercising, or expanding, influence in public decisionmaking. oops we made a decision our state government doesn't like and they made that illegal
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2022 07:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 12:37 |
|
|
Ogmius815 posted:If you’re unhappy either the quality of Supreme Court justices nominated between 2017 and 2021 I hope you voted for Clinton. Otherwise, you have yourself to blame. Clinton ran a poo poo campaign. That's nobody's fault but her own.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 28, 2024 04:33
|
|