- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2024 03:44
|
|
- SubponticatePoster
- Aug 9, 2004
-
Every day takes figurin' out all over again how to fuckin' live.
-
Slippery Tilde
|
Since this is about a contraband, let's say I get busted by a cop with a bag of weed. The cop writes me a ticket and tells me to show up tomorrow at court with my bag of weed.
I show up to court minus the bag of weed. Is that also destruction of evidence?
I'm convinced by the other posters that it's clear the guy did destroy evidence based on the testimony of the other guys on the boat. What kills me here is that it was completely avoidable if the official who boarded the boat had simply taken the fish. Hell taken a picture of the fish. He's now facing an additional charge because the official didn't do the simplest thing in my mind, which is to seize the contraband.
If the other crew had kept their mouth shut, what then? You get to shore and there are no offending fish. Does the guy get off on the original charge?
So maybe that's what bugs me. If the state is going to charge someone, they should do the work including taking control of the evidence.
It's more comparable to getting popped with a bag of weed, and the cop tells you come over to his to his car where he can get an evidence testing kit for the weed. On the way to his car you eat the contents of the bag and replace it with parsley. The patrol boat is a tiny thing and this was a larger vessel. The agent simply didn't have enough room on his boat for all the contraband fish. The guy is facing an additional charge because he destroyed evidence. When you have broken the law the solution is not to break more laws to try and cover up the one you already broke.
|
#
¿
May 1, 2014 04:17
|
|
- SubponticatePoster
- Aug 9, 2004
-
Every day takes figurin' out all over again how to fuckin' live.
-
Slippery Tilde
|
Isn't the simplest solution for the cop in your example to take possession of the suspected weed and take it himself over to his car? With the fish too, it wasn't a ton of tuna, it was..70? 20" fish?
It doesn't matter what the "simplest solution" is. What happened is they told him to bring the fish back to port, he destroyed them. Maybe the simplest solution was to impound his loving boat and make him swim but they didn't do that either. The guy made a conscious decision to destroy evidence against him, period.
|
#
¿
May 1, 2014 05:41
|
|
- SubponticatePoster
- Aug 9, 2004
-
Every day takes figurin' out all over again how to fuckin' live.
-
Slippery Tilde
|
I wonder how long it will be until we stop getting these weekly reminders that Scalia being dead is a good thing.
Heat death of the universe? I mean, you could be having a really bad day in 20 years and still think to yourself, "Well, at least Scalia's dead."
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2016 03:01
|
|
- SubponticatePoster
- Aug 9, 2004
-
Every day takes figurin' out all over again how to fuckin' live.
-
Slippery Tilde
|
So what would've happened had this been heard when the Court still had 9 members? What was the case actually about?
Compelling public-sector employees to contribute union dues as they benefit directly from the union's bargaining whether they want to belong or not. Basically making GBS threads on the whole "right to work" stuff we've been seeing that's destroying unions.
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2016 16:27
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2024 03:44
|
|
- SubponticatePoster
- Aug 9, 2004
-
Every day takes figurin' out all over again how to fuckin' live.
-
Slippery Tilde
|
Leave it as ASSoL so it can easily be pronounced as "rear end in a top hat"
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2016 23:56
|
|