|
I guess I am having trouble understanding the Hobby Lobby thing. To me, it seems like they are arguing that "we should not have to give our money to an insurance company (on behalf of our employees) that may then use said money to pay for contraception that goes against our religious beliefs." How is that different than saying "we should not have to give our money to an employee that may then use said money to pay for contraception that goes against our religious beliefs?" Or am I misunderstanding the healthcare law, and that Hobby Lobby would actually be specifically billed for contraception given to employees by their insurance?
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2013 20:37
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 17:49 |
|