Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Protocol7 posted:

It's a pretty great little dashcam, and thankfully not a child. This email is just loving hilarious. Though I don't know why they insist on using a max 32GB card, it works fine with a 64GB Samsung card.

The "don't use cards larger than 32 GB" thing is pretty common in cheap dashcams, and the reason probably comes down to Microsoft.

The SDXC spec that enables >32GB SD cards requires supporting Microsoft's exFAT filesystem. This is a patent-encumbered system and licensing is required to support it commercially.

That said, SDXC and SDHC are basically identical from an electrical standpoint. The SD > SDHC transition required a reworking of how the cards identify their size so it was impossible for a SD device to interact with a SDHC card without a firmware update, but when they designed the new format with SDHC they were thinking ahead as far as capacity. The C_SIZE field is 22 bits long and counts multiples of 512KB, allowing it to support a card up to 2TB. The SDHC spec just said that anything over 65535 was invalid for now. A SDHC device that just doesn't consider large numbers to be invalid would effectively have unofficial support for SDXC cards without having to support exFAT.

So basically if they want to officially support >32GB cards they have to pay Microsoft for the right to do it, and I'm sure a lot of these cameras have really tight margins.

I'd assume there are a portion of cameras that say that which truly do not support >32GB cards, either due to following the spec to the letter or bugs resulting from a lack of testing up there. I think however that there are a lot more that work just fine with larger cards but are officially SDHC devices for licensing reasons and thus can't officially support them.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Sagebrush posted:

Does that also mean that if you turn it on while cruising at 75mph, and it slows down to 35mph for heavy traffic, that when you disable it to take manual control it'll floor it back up to 75 and ram the car in front?
IIRC that's supposedly what happened here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWaz2jer8Ek&t=140s

Autopilot was on, did something wrong, driver corrected, this disabled autopilot, and it immediately attempted to return to the last cruise control speed which severely exacerbated the situation.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Major Isoor posted:

That motorcyclist at 14:20! He must've been so pissed about the damage, but what a guy

Damage? Are you talking about the cracked panel? There is no way that slowly bouncing ball that barely tapped the bike caused that, it has to have been pre-existing.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
Did that other goon who was working on a dashcam project a while back ever end up getting anywhere with it? I gave up on my Pi Zero-based ideas a while ago but have recently been having the itch to work on a project again, especially now that there are a lot of other SBCs in that class now which may be more suitable for the task.

In case I missed anything when searching around, is there anything out there commercially that will automatically connect to my home WiFi and offload flagged recordings to my NAS without requiring my cell phone or a cloud service to be involved? There are a lot that have WiFi, but it seems that most of those are for a cell phone to connect and download videos. That'd certainly be nice too, but it's not that important IMO. For me the biggest goal is to keep as much of the card free for the rolling file buffer while not requiring any manual actions on my part.

Too often I've found my camera only running one buffer file because the automatically saved recordings filled up the card without me realizing.

wolrah fucked around with this message at 21:36 on Aug 5, 2019

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

MC Hawking posted:

Edit 3: oh my god why is there so much wiring involved. Why don't these drat things have battery backup?! Who the gently caress wants to pop trim panels and put in fuse taps?
Because the only batteries dense enough to power a dashcam for a reasonable amount of time without making it huge really don't like the sort of temperature cycling seen inside a car in a lot of the world. There were a lot of battery powered dashcams, but most of them tended to have battery failures and thus pretty much everyone switched to using capacitors to give the camera time to safely shut down. All cars already have a nice rugged battery proven to take those kinds of conditions, so why not just use that, or an external pack that can be larger and made out of less volatile cells?


FogHelmut posted:

There's other connectors from various companies - mirrortap and invisiwire. They plug into the mirror harness if you have a powered rearview mirror.
It sounds like they're looking for always-on power to support parking mode. Usually the mirror or sunroof connectors that tend to be the easy ceiling-level taps are only powered when the ignition is on. Great for radar detectors and drive-only cameras, not so great in this case.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

babyeatingpsychopath posted:

I went back a few pages with no luck. What's the current recommendation for a bluetooth backup cam? I'm just going to hook it into the reverse light circuit so it comes on when backing up. Only going used for lining up the trailer hitch (mostly in the dark, so low light a plus). My head unit will accept a bluetooth camera right now, which is why i'm asking in that direction specifically.
There is no such thing as a standard for Bluetooth backup cams. Bluetooth is typically used for low bitrate content, high quality audio and high refresh rate input devices normally push its limits, so video is not really ideal for it. It's technically possible I guess, maybe using PAN mode or even just as a direct serial bitstream, but as there are no standards if such a thing exists it'd almost certainly be proprietary. I feel like it's more likely you're misinterpreting something and/or there's some kind of translation issue. Can you link the head unit?

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Takes No Damage posted:

Sup bros, just turning right on this red light. What's that? Yeeld? I don't know what that word means...

https://i.imgur.com/a6QDwEF.mp4

I could have hit this dumbass and still been :airquote: right, but I chose not to. If it isn't clear, that's a left turn flashing yellow arrow (yield) turning green (ROW).
Eh, I'd put you both pretty close to equal with that one.

In a some jurisdictions the law says that turning traffic from a single turn lane goes in to the nearest lane unless there are cat tracks or similar indicating otherwise. Even where that's not the law, it's just a good idea. There's no reason your protected left and their right-on-red couldn't happen at the same time, and they'd even have had a full lane of buffer space between, but you aimed for the middle lane and they incompetently took one and a half lanes for a simple right turn.

Had either of you stayed entirely in the nearest lane this would have been a non-issue.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

taqueso posted:

"Go after" like inform and give a warning fix it ticket that means nothing or give real tickets?

Depends on who's behind the wheel.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Blue Footed Booby posted:

Iirc, this changed recently. You can be forced to pony up biometrics, but not passwords or pins.
Courts have ruled in a variety of ways on these sorts of things over the years depending on the situation, and so far most of the decisions have been at the state or district levels so they technically don't apply entirely to the rest of the country (though obviously courts do tend to respect precedent from other courts where applicable).

Here's a relevant recent case, and at the bottom of the article are links to discussion of other similar cases over recent years: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/11/police-cant-force-child-porn-suspect-to-reveal-his-password-court-rules/

The general consensus of the courts so far seems to be that requiring the accused to disclose their password violates the fifth amendment, but that ordering them to enter the password so specific data can be decrypted may be OK in cases where the existence of the evidence is a "foregone conclusion".

Not a lawyer and all that stuff but it seems like when it comes to any kind of surveillance footage the "foregone conclusion" justification by the state would be hard to counter because it'd be reasonably easy to determine what the camera could have seen.

---

My personal opinion is that the right balance is to have a well-hidden camera and only bring it up to the law if it's actually going to benefit you. If you've hosed up so badly that they've searched your vehicle and found your camera without your involvement, you probably have bigger problems.

I wouldn't use GPS logging in most cases because there are a lot more situations where that can gently caress you than help you, audio varies by your personal situation and what constitutes "eavesdropping" in your jurisdiction.

wolrah fucked around with this message at 19:09 on Dec 3, 2019

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Nitrox posted:

when you have WiFi, your phone is the screen.
Yeah, that was Nitrox's point about the over-50s. For someone who can handle using an app, your phone offers a much better screen than any standalone dashcam has ever been equipped with at the cost of a very small amount of latency (so when positioning you might have to tweak it a bit and then wait a fraction of a second for the display to update).

taqueso posted:

That post made me realize a way to have encrypted dashcam footage might be making a car pc into a simple DVR for some webcams.
The trickiest part about any kind of DIY solution is handling crashes, both the internal software kind and the external vehicular kind.

For the former, many "industrial PC" or "dev board" type platforms offer a hardware watchdog feature which can help. Basically it's just a simple hardware timer that needs to be reset by software every X period of time. If it is not reset, in time, it trips and resets the CPU causing the device to reboot. Normal PC hardware generally doesn't have this, but the kind of hardware intended for people to build appliances around often does. If you really insist on using generic PC hardware you can also build one pretty easily out of a microcontroller wired to a serial port and your motherboard's reset line, but now you've added another potential point of failure.

For the latter, the big issue is sudden power loss. SD cards and the FAT32 filesystem most commonly used on them are both fairly fragile when it comes to interruptions during writes. If a semi truck blows a red and suddenly the battery and alternator are a block down the street, you want that camera to still be able to shut down safely so you can be confident the video is actually saved.. This is why a lot of modern dashcams have supercapacitors, they're a lot more tolerant of the extreme temperatures experienced in cars than lithium batteries.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

flakeloaf posted:

How do you not hear that?
Dunno about you, but I know a number of people whose solution to their car making a bad noise is to turn up the radio.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Craptacular posted:

Someone posted that before. IIRC it was from a movie being filmed on location.

Yeah, it was from The Hitman's Bodyguard.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

stevewm posted:

But most standard lead acid batteries last this long or longer... So all that additional expense for... what exactly? For BMW to make more money on service appointments!
Lithium batteries have been a thing in the sporty car world for a while, spend a few hundred bucks to save a few pounds.

The thing about having to code the car specifically for a battery though, that's the part I'd like to hear someone actually justify.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

stevewm posted:

Wonder if that's why a lot of them are in the trunk now.. The last 3 GM vehicles I've owned, they where all in the trunk.
BMW always used weight balance as their reason for putting batteries in the trunk.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

BitBasher posted:

And in the summer here in Vegas the passengers can easily start to bake in that 90 seconds the AC shuts off at a stop light, which is straight stupid in an expensive Mercedes.
The first time I ever went to Vegas was in late July IIRC, we pulled in to the parking garage at the Mirage in the rental car with the AC cranked. Literally the moment the car was shut off it felt like the temperature rose by 20 degrees.

Never made that mistake again. Every time I've been there since has been in the spring or late fall.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Krispy Wafer posted:

I can't find it now, but there was a car column where the author was agonizing over buying a cheap used Audi A4 wagon manual transmission. I could be getting the exact issue wrong, but I think this model Audi had a plastic timing belt tensioner that was guaranteed to fail and was buried so deep into the engine that the whole thing had to be removed to get to it.

Car engineers can be real assholes.

IIRC you're thinking of the 4.2L V8, which for whatever fucktarded reason has the timing chains on the back instead of the front, meaning that servicing them is an engine-out job, and of course in true German fashion they used plastic that disintegrates over time for the chain guides.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

STR posted:

Ford did this when they converted the old 4.0 V6 to OHC. Except they used a jackshaft, so you had one timing chain on the front, and one on the rear. Guess which one usually needed attention first?
As screwy as that design was, it at least somewhat made sense given the goals and constraints of adding OHC to an ancient pushrod design for cheap. Audi didn't have that excuse.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
My G1W is around six years I think, being outside in Ohio winters for its first three. The battery died in the first year, but it did still work when I needed it the other day. That said, it was kind of luck so I'm definitely shopping around again.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Heners_UK posted:

The Bike Thread and Bike Commuting threads discuss this every so often. It's not cheap but Ride eye is a dedicated platform for this sort of thing. Action cams are also popular there as you're more likely to be taking them off when you leave the bike.
I use my GoPro when I'm on my bike for pretty much that reason. Its disadvantages as a dash cam don't really apply to bike use, it's built to take the elements, and there are options for basically every kind of mounting you could possibly want.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

bird with big dick posted:

In a massive impact dash cams typically aren't going to record continuously through the moment of impact, right? They're going to glitch out from the G forces?
In theory solid state components aren't meaningfully affected by g-forces that don't physically damage them. In practice internal cables can move around, spring-loaded connectors can disconnect, etc.

It is definitely possible to build a dashcam that should not glitch out in any crash that doesn't result in total destruction of the camera itself. How close any given product on the market gets to that ideal is a question we don't have great data for.

quote:

I have/had a Thinkware F800 Pro and the two video files from before the impact are 36 seconds long and the one video file from after the impact goes back to being 60 seconds long and there's about a 1 second gap in between them according to the timestamp. And there's no reason to power the thing up and connect it to my phone, right? There's nothing to be gained over the files that I've already taken off the card?
Unless the camera itself has internal storage, it's just going to be yet another card reader from the standpoint of accessing existing data. No gain to be had.

I would guess your SD card shifted enough to lose contact or the power supply drooped enough that it didn't successfully write. Being a capacitor camera the latter shouldn't really be a problem for your device.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Major Isoor posted:

(Also drat, I'd hate to be the guy who lost his wheel and hit a tree right at the start...poo poo)
Seriously, if that driver wasn't also the person responsible for tightening those bolts there was literally nothing they could have done.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
I got this one for my A129 Pro Duo https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07P4HBRMV/ and it's worked great so far, but I've only had it a month so I definitely haven't stressed the write endurance. It hasn't even filled up yet.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

totalnewbie posted:

Something something ounce prevention pound cure. Load your trailer correctly and physics will generally keep you safe. Load it incorrectly and hell hath no fury like a poorly loaded trailer.
And not just load it correctly, but secure the load properly too. An unsecured load moving around is even worse than a secure but poorly balanced load. You can compensate for a badly balanced load to the limits of your vehicle's ability to control said load, but an unsecured load is dynamic and changes even in response to your attempts to compensate.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

BIG HEADLINE posted:

So I hope it's not too cliched in the asking, but I'm looking for the following:

A hardwire-capable dashcam set, preferably one with a rear camera option. 4K isn't important but good 1080p/2K is preferred.

I've Googled for it, of course, but the "Who?" names don't really inspire confidence. I've heard Garmin's top-tier offerings aren't stellar, and the last one I was looking at were the Nextbase 522GW and 622GW.

I have the Viofo A129 Pro Duo and I'm happy with it.

4K front, 1080p rear, WiFi that supports both AP mode for phone access and client mode to connect to a home network. The front cam is more or less the same as the popular A119 models.

Sample video of me getting a bit loose on some slush coming off the highway a few months ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x25lPrkXl10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye6kEoEmtRg

If you don't care about the 4K front camera you can get the non-pro A129 Duo for a fair bit less money to have 1080p each way.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
Pressing the button is good if you're lazy, sure if I have something that really matters happen I'm pulling the card immediately but if it's just something little I might totally forget by the time I get home and not think about it until the next time I do pull the card and run through the saved clips.

Also if you have one of the older battery based cameras that can't old time anymore it becomes a lot more important since finding anything in the rolling buffer is impossible.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Nitrox posted:

Why don't you just get extension tow mirrors and not fiddle with questionable camera bullshit? This is how 99.9% of people tow.
Agreed. https://www.amazon.com/CIPA-11950-Universal-Towing-Mirror/dp/B00029WRKA/

Cheap and easy, other styles are linked in the related product section.

sharkytm posted:

Yup. To be honest, you don't need to see directly behind you, I towed for years with regular mirrors. Angle them correctly so that you can just see your door handles, and you'll be fine. If you need to beck up a long distance for some reason, get a spotter.
Depends on what Zero VGS means by "mostly blocks my rear and side mirrors".

Some part of the mirror should stick out beyond the width of the trailer so that you can see straight down the side. Partial blockage is fine, but if you couldn't see someone peeking around the back of it you need more mirror. The blind spot "shadow" of your trailer should be either straight back or narrowing in to the distance, not widening.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
I just pulled the SD card from my A129 Pro Duo and ran through all the recordings in the save folder looking for anything that was worth posting.

I found that a significant number of clips had broken video from the front camera with nothing but a static view of whatever was in front of the camera when the car was started. The audio records as normal and the rear camera file is fine, but the front camera clip is just that one frame forever. If there are multiple clips from the same drive it'll be the same static frame for all of them, as if the camera itself is crashing and just dumping the one thing forever.

I can then have another clip from later the same day that works fine.

Any ideas? I took the opportunity to update the firmware, I did not note which version I was on previously though but it's either whatever it shipped with or whatever was current when I installed it in January.

The one constant is that it only seems to happen when my car was parked outside for an extended period of time, but it doesn't seem to fit with the symptoms others report for overheating cameras.

I am using this Sandisk SD card https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07P4HBRMV/ and an Aukey 30W power adapter.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Major Isoor posted:

I had a similar issue with my A119, and updating the firmware fixed it. Have the symptoms changed at all, after you did that?
Mind you, when it happened to me the issue occurred every time I drove though, so I'm not sure if the issue is exactly the same as yours - since I don't have it recording while I'm parked.
I just updated the firmware yesterday after noticing this behavior so I don't know what may or may not have changed yet. That was an ordeal in itself because the file copied incorrectly the first time and while the camera seems to be smart enough to validate before flashing it still behaves in a way that makes it h look like it's been bricked instead.

I do not have parking mode active, it's powered from a switched outlet and is only recording while the car is running The frame it gets stuck on is literally what it was looking at when powered on as far as I can tell, it's always my street or a parking lot at one of my client sites.

wolrah fucked around with this message at 14:17 on Oct 7, 2021

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Nocheez posted:

Did you try another SD card? I think that's the same one I'm using on my A129 Duo but it is working fine.
I have not, but as the files are coming out complete and without errors I have no reason to suspect the card.

I have managed to find this thread on the Viofo forums that fits my issue exactly https://www.viofo.com/community/index.php?threads/front-camera-freeze.27271/

That thread notes a significant point that the OSD continues to display in the broken clips over the stuck frame, and overlays itself with every update eventually becoming a mess like what used to happen when you'd drag a frozen window around in Windows 95.

This indicates that the problem is upstream of the video encoder, which is then generating and outputting to the card valid video from a bad input. We'll see how a firmware update goes.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
I have the hardwire kit sitting on my desk next to me right now actually, it was supposed to get installed last weekend but I injured my hand mountain biking so projects requiring any kind of dexterity are out for the time being.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

The Locator posted:

First point of contact was my left rear tire, then moved back to the LR fender. I was able to buff the black marks completely off this morning without too much trouble and can't see any sign of damage behind the fender.



Probably should buy some new trousers though.

You should probably get your rear suspension checked out for any subtle damage, at least an alignment check and a visual inspection on the corner that was hit. Something being slightly off that you'd never notice visually can still add up to substantial additional tire wear at best and of course hidden damage could result in a wheel deciding it wants to be free at the worst possible moment.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

lite_sleepr posted:

How would one mount a rear facing dashcam on a truck with a rear window that can be rolled down?
Mount it to surrounding trim or something else that doesn't roll down but still allows a reasonable view.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

GreenBuckanneer posted:

Is there a thread recommended dash cam with a backup cam? I've tried a few cheap ones and the ones I've tried can't read license plates because the camera quality is so poor.
License plates are really tricky, especially in the US where there's so much variety in colors, reflectivity, and font. Even static license plate recognition cameras set up next to a driveway require careful setup to get the best result, so one that has to be mounted in a limited set of locations in a moving vehicle is never going to be ideal. If you've ever seen a cop car with what look like a bunch of security cameras mounted to the trunk and hood that's what a professional in-motion setup needs to perform reliably.

I have a Viofo A129 Pro Duo, which is a pretty well regarded unit with a 4K front cam with a 1080p rear cam, and it varies from perfectly readable to absolutely useless sometimes moment by moment with the same plate. The video from the 4K camera is usually more readable when lighting cooperates, but each get washed out just as easily if light is hitting the plate just right and a fast moving vehicle can still be blurry. More often than not when I've picked random vehicles to try I've been able to get at least most of a plate from a series of frames, but that takes effort and luck.

That's one of the reasons I keep my audio turned on, if something happens and I was able to see the plate myself I'll say it aloud to make sure it's in the clip even if the camera didn't catch it.

the paradigm shift posted:

on the flip side these rules make no sense for bicycles
100% agreed, they don't make sense for bicycles, and if bicycles had entirely separated non-conflicting infrastructure they wouldn't need to follow those rules, but when you're sharing infrastructure sometimes that means you stop for less maneuverable traffic.


A good general rule I have for the road is if you do something that other road users have to react to, and you had a reasonable choice to not do that thing, you've probably done wrong. If you want to blow a stop at an empty intersection I couldn't give less of a gently caress, but the rear end in a top hat in the video forced oncoming traffic to react to his dawdling bullshit. Honestly I'd have had less of a problem with it had he done this at speed and cleared the intersection before anyone else got there

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

limp_cheese posted:

How important is a rear view dashcam? I'm also curious what people have to say about the VIOFO A129 Plus Duo but it sounds like its a great camera.
AFAIK the Plus Duo is the same basic setup as my Pro Duo but with a 1440p front cam instead of 4K. The 4K model sometimes overheats in very hot climates, the 1440p and 1080p models apparently don't have the same problem. I live in Ohio so I've never had an issue with that.

quote:

How hard is it to mount one of those or just a dashcam in general? I'm assuming its mounting it, plugging it into the 12V slot for power, than syncing it to your phone. Hard wiring it is too advanced for me if that's important.
Mounting the Viofos is trivial, they come with a bracket that has the standard 3M double sided tape on it. You peel the cover off the tape and stick it in place. Routing the wires is the hard part, regardless of if you hard wire or use a 12v socket.

Mine is....lazily installed at the moment. The power and rear camera wire both loop around the rear view mirror for support before heading down to tuck behind my phone mount before slipping next to the passenger seat to run to the back. The power plugs in to my rear 12v socket since that's switched, and the camera cable goes further back between the back seats before cutting over to the C pillar where I tuck it under the plastic trim to go up to roof level and back to the hatch.

I've had "take my headliner down and finish installing this plus my reverse camera" on my to do list for about 14 months now.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

opengl128 posted:

I really don't understand why in those dashcam compilations you always see/hear the driver madly pawing at the button to save the clip. Are you running a 32MB SD card my dude? Just download the clip when you get home. Your average reasonably sized card will hold like a week's worth of footage.
I have the short term memory of a goldfish even normally and I like to smoke weed so I forget to pull the card for weeks or months at a time.

It won't be an issue for anything I'm involved in or bad enough to be worth stopping for, but so far I haven't seen any of that.

Also this just reminded me I have some clips from the other day I need to retrieve.

---

This is why I wish someone would make a camera that had SMB upload support. When I get home and it sees my WiFi it should connect and upload any flagged clips to my network share.

I have figured out how to get my A129 to connect to my WiFi but it won't upload anything automatically, the server would need to reach out to it and download the files. Also having WiFi turned on causes some interference on the rear camera feed so I can't just leave it on.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Buff Hardback posted:

I’m happy with the A129 but my hybrid has a tiny 12v battery, and I work from home, so parking mode kills my battery. Blackvue has the external battery so I’m going to be using that to solve that problem
As far as I can tell the BlackVue battery offerings are the same generic OEM batteries a bunch of other brands sell on Amazon with wiring kits for basically any dashcam ever made, so you don't really need to replace your camera just to get a parking mode battery.



As for cameras, I'm happy with my A129 Pro Duo but having had it I think I should have gone with the Plus model instead. The 4K front camera doesn't really seem to offer any significant gain in visual quality but it definitely is more sensitive to heat. I haven't had any crashes since the firmware update last year but the forums still indicate a lot more issues with 4K cameras than lower, which is a trend I've also seen in action cams.

I haven't noticed any "blurry lens" issue yet even with the car mostly parked outside, I do have the polarized filter installed though so that might help protect it in some way.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
Another member of the Viofo club here, A129 Pro Duo. I had an issue with the shipping firmware where it would sometimes fail to record video for the front camera, it just froze on a certain frame, but a firmware update resolved that issue and it's been fine ever since.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

bird with big dick posted:

My Ford has a USB port on the dash to power poo poo, does anyone know if there's a way to surgerize a USB cord to the barrel kind of power plug that's on my Thinkware U1000? It seemed like there should be from my research but I tried it and didn't get it to work. Connected the ground from the dashcam cord to the black wire on the USB cord, and both power wires from the dashcam cord (switched and constant power) to the red power wire inside the USB cord. It seems like the colors inside USB cables are supposed to be universal (red for power, black for ground, white and green for data) but not sure how to tell I guess.
The U1000 seems to want a 12v input, so you're not going to get that out of a 5v USB port.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Ok Comboomer posted:

The Viofo 129 Duo Pro has a $50 off coupon, putting it at like $195, vs the $133 of the 129 Plus.

Should I go for 4K or save ~$60? Any chance that the 4K model can pull somewhat good footage for travelogue b-roll use, or should I go for the cheaper model with potentially better thermal management and night performance for use as an everyday dashcam and just use a GoPro for when I want to film something that looks better?
Not sure how Youtube's compression might hurt them but here's some sample clips off my 129 Pro from the last time I dumped my save folder.

Front:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEqsjABxO-s
Rear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egaZ6EWipug
Front Night w/ bright lights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDfWe5s3ngk
No rear cam to go with this one because I had my bike on the back so it was mostly blocked.

wolrah fucked around with this message at 21:30 on Apr 28, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?
I think at this point the A129 and 139 are the default choices you should look at unless you have a specific reason to be drawn to something else.

The A129 has a screen on the device and is compatible with most of the same accessories as the older A119, but the A139 supports a third interior camera so if you do rideshare or otherwise might care about that it's worth considering..

The 129 is available in base (1080p front), Plus (1440p front) and Pro (4K Front) where the 139 is 1440p in the base model and 4K in the Pro model. They're all 1080p on the remote cameras.

I have a 129 Pro and it has an issue where it'll occasionally freeze the front camera and keep recording audio plus rear, but the front view is just static. It happens most often in hot weather and was more common before a firmware update a few years ago, it's only happened once that I've seen since. Supposedly this is specific to the 4K models, which are also known to overheat in hot climates. 1080p and 1440p models do not do either from what I've found.

Night vision is better on the lower resolution sensors.

Personally I recommend the 129 Plus by default. I wouldn't say don't get the 4K but I also wouldn't say I think the tradeoffs are worth the higher resolution in the daytime.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply