quote:

quote:

I am kind of with her on this. He could have been taken alive; he was unarmed. Wonder why he wasn’t?

Bin Laden probably had little operational control over Al Qaeda for several years prior, due to his hiding, so intelligence gain might be limited. More important, you do not want a martyr, a point of focus for his followers, or him making any public statements. If he is alive, a$$holes like Stein would demand his release.

quote:

Hillary is perhaps even worse than Bath-House Barrie.
Anyone that can’t see that Trump is better comparatively, needs to drop out of politics and political discussions. They don’t have the tools...
6 posted on 9/10/2016, 6:48:03 PM by DoughtyOne (Fifty-nine days until we take measures to end this nightmare. Trump, for the Free World...)

quote:

If a muzlim had refused, he would have been promoted.
7 posted on 9/9/2016, 1:13:20 PM by I want the USA back (The media is acting full-on as the Democratic Party's press agency now: Robert Spencer)

Cape Cod Crab Chip posted:

George Soros sent me my funnymoney Canadian payday for my illegal votes but I told him, Georgie, listen, these are on the house.

DemeaninDemon posted:

Boomers gave us Reagan and the whole economic theory of gently caress YOU GOT MINE. So basically they poo poo all over the next few generations and possibly (definitely) every future generation through destroying the planet's friendly ecosystem.

quote:

Finally a win for GOP in Supreme Court concerning voting.

Blacks always hurt more? Total BS.

1 posted on 09/13/2016 8:37:16 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

With all the Hillary votes that coukdnt go for her replacement if she drops out, I almost wish they got their early voting.

3 posted on 09/13/2016 8:42:04 AM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: MNDude

Early voting is a conduit for frequent voting.

4 posted on 09/13/2016 8:43:11 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Democrats had claimed the reduction, along with other voting changes, disproportionately burdened black voters and those who lean Democratic.

Gee, just like voter ID.

Wouldn't want to do anything that might reduce RAT voter fraud.

5 posted on 09/13/2016 8:44:47 AM PDT by upchuck (Who will Killary appoint to SCOTUS if president? Who will Trump appoint? Remember on Nov 8, 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Democrats had claimed the reduction, along with other voting changes, disproportionately burdened black voters and those who lean Democratic.

That position is inherently racist.
7 posted on 09/13/2016 8:45:21 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: upchuck

disproportionately burdened black voters and those who lean Democratic.

Don't African-Americans know that every time they hear this, it's Democrats calling them stupid. I mean, really. They are too stupid to get ID, show ID or understand what ID is.

8 posted on 09/13/2016 8:46:38 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

“Democrats had claimed the reduction, along with other voting changes, disproportionately burdened black voters and those who lean Democratic.”

Passive-aggressive. Dems believe their constituents are too stupid and incompetent to obtain identification and register to vote prior to any election. They know this, and they know that we know it, so the media presents it as “more of a burden”, or “disenfranchizing”. Their constituency, already besotted with a victim mentality, eat it up and start singing “We Shall Overcome”. 50+ years on and it still works. You must admit, the Dems know their base!

10 posted on 09/13/2016 8:48:54 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

“Voter” if you can’t figure out how to vote in a 29-day window, you are useless. You can even vote by mail. Can you figure out how to mail things?? Do you know any people to help you? Do you have any family to help you? Can you find some social worker to help you? Can you find some church to help you? Can you find any BLM people to help you? Do you live in a total vacuum? How do you get food? Voting is similar, but you don’t have to pay.

I forgot to ask this first. Can you read?

14 posted on 09/13/2016 8:55:25 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill TWITTER !! Kill FACEBOOK !! Free MILO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Blacks always hurt more?

Of course. The democRATs view blacks as irresponsible, ineducable, unproductive little monkey children who must always be given freebies, protected from criticism, and excused when they become violent. They can't help it, you see ... it's just in their nature. The worst racists in America are democRATs.

16 posted on 09/13/2016 8:56:32 AM PDT by NorthMountain (Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: Democrats hate too much

Melowese! Outstanding. First time for that. A new one to my "Name your Ethnic Baby" book.

18 posted on 09/13/2016 8:59:19 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill TWITTER !! Kill FACEBOOK !! Free MILO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

If they can sign up for a SNAP card, they can get a voter ID.

19 posted on 09/13/2016 9:01:39 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

I think libs just try to change EVERYTHING just for fun. If they had got the longer voting time, next time around it would have been from the day after the convention. If they got that, they would say that is too late, they want 4-year-early voting.

Someone will want the school zone speed reduce to 10 mi/h. Next would be 5 mi/h. Finally, no car can drive withing 1000 ft of a school. Then a mile. Then no cars can drive in the same state from sunrise to sunset. Then, no cars at all.

"Give us an inch and we'll want a mile," should be their motto.

24 posted on 09/13/2016 9:09:13 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill TWITTER !! Kill FACEBOOK !! Free MILO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Sounds like the democrats are racist. They assume their voter base is too lazy to register to vote or find the means to get to the polls.

27 posted on 09/13/2016 9:26:28 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Democrats had claimed the reduction, along with other voting changes, disproportionately burdened black

Do they ever stop claiming this for everything? Holy Christ.

34 posted on 09/13/2016 9:43:06 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

How does requiring a single day to vote supposedly predominantly affect Democrat voters?

The last time I checked, those on welfare don’t have a job to go to on voting day, so they have all the time in the world to stand around waiting for their chance to vote. The dead, who predominantly vote Democrat aren’t going anywhere, at anytime, so they can vote on the same day as everyone else.

I have had a job everyday of my life since I turned 16, and with the exception of my nine years in the Marine Corps, I have always been able to make it to the voting booth.

So, WHY does one need a whole week, 10, 14, 21 days to “vote”? Unless, you are going MULTIPLE times, under MULTIPLE names!!

So THAT’S what they mean by “predominantly affecting” their voters, they only get to vote once, maybe twice, if they can get to the next polling station in time, instead of the 2-3 times a day, for 10-21 days!

35 posted on 09/13/2016 9:50:05 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Can somebody tell me when there suddenly appeared a "constitutional right" to vote three weeks before election day?!?

When I was growing up you had two choices, either vote on election day...or if you were going to be out of town on election day you could make a trip to the courthouse fill out a ton of paperwork, provide proof that you would be out of town and couldn't vote on election and then and only then you could vote absentee. Those were the options, no weekend voting, no voting by mail, no voting for a month before the election, nothing. And somehow amazingly democracy worked just fine.

36 posted on 09/13/2016 9:54:59 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

To: SMGFan

Is early voting even legal? Federal law establishes the day of elections for Federal elections as “the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November.” So how can there be voting on days that are not the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November/

40 posted on 09/13/2016 11:19:07 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Cythereal posted:

Repeat after me: the free market is good, except when big business does things I don't agree with.

quote:

Don't African-Americans know that every time they hear this, it's Democrats calling them stupid.

quote:

Dems believe their constituents are too stupid and incompetent to obtain identification and register to vote prior to any election. They know this, and they know that we know it, so the media presents it as “more of a burden”, or “disenfranchizing”. Their constituency, already besotted with a victim mentality, eat it up and start singing “We Shall Overcome”. 50+ years on and it still works.

Twelve by Pies posted:

No, it's simpler than that. The free market is always good. If a business does a thing I don't like, that's bad. Since it's bad, it's not the free market.

McGlockenshire posted:

I'd just like to remind the thread that Oregon's awesome US senators introduced a bill to switch the entire nation to vote-by-mail, a method that drastically reduces the types of fraud that ""conservatives"" ""care"" about, and makes voting easier for everybody involved at the same time.

It will of course gain no traction, because the deplorables don't want easier voting.

Twelve by Pies posted:

"Why won't these stupid idiots realize that Democrats are calling them stupid?"

quote:

Although my initial reaction was to oppose this, on second thought, I support this. Although I believe it is something that the government should pay for.

The government need to support middle class, working families,and encourage them to have children.

Because of the tough economic times, middle class families are not having children. This is hurting the US. The only ones having children today are those on welfare. or the illegals.

The government needs to do something to encourage the educated, middle class to have children, and discourage those on welfare from having children.

16 posted on 9/13/2016, 2:42:03 PM by Cowboy Bob

quote:

“Quit hyperventilating FReepers. Trump has his base locked up and now he’s draining away Hillary leftist base.”

So is he lying about wanting this program just to get votes? When he gets elected will he ditch this plan or will he implement it? What other programs is he lying about just to get votes? How does this make him any different from any other politician?

37 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:39:01 PM by WatchOutForSnakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

quote:

I will say that I don’t agree with the federal government being involved in any of this. We as a nation knee working intelligent people breed however we can make that happen we have to make that happen. The federal government fees for welfare rats to stay home and breed pays for immigrants to stay home and breed the pace for everyone to stay home and read except the people we need. It should not be based on income, race sex sexual orientation or anything other than does the person have a job and are paying payroll tax in the government audit give them a break with their own dollars, not magic dollars that they never paid (EITC)to have children.

In my opinion the federal government should reduce their taxes and let the state start increasing their taxes to cover Medicaid welfare education ... And probably this topic also. Until then it’s in our national security to breed good intelligent hard working educated citizens. Having said that the federal government will screw it up.

38 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:59:12 PM by wgmalabama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Twelve by Pies posted:

I can't make heads or tails of this nonsense.

quote:

A little Socialism is better than a lot of Clinton Communism.

50 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:26:47 PM by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)

Smeep posted:

There is literally nothing they can't rationalize.

Night10194 posted:

They're 100% down with socialism...if it's only for whites. Maybe kind of nationalistic, too.

quote:

I’ve been horrifyingly busy to the point I haven’t had time to post at all. But Trump’s plan is Pro-Family and brilliant. I support it 100%, and I suspect many working class Freepers do too. Women ought to be incentivized to stay home and raise their children. At the moment, the only people having kids are illegal aliens, and their kids—based on demographics and voting— are little bastards who hate America. Real Americans ought to be encouraged to have children to offset this imbalance, or else we’ll be Mexico in 20 or 30 years.

As far as this not being “conservative.” I can’t imagine anything more conservative than something that is actually supporting the family. Our medical costs are insane, easily 2x to 4x what the Europeans are paying. The medical care industry has us by the balls and there is no plan that anyone is offering to get them to let go. We are not living in a Libertarian-Economic utopia over here, with Trump screwing it up by adding a tax cut for your medical care expenses. We’re living in America 2016 where everyone is trying their best to screw us.

As for the complaints people are having over the nature of this tax break— not being available to people making 250k or more: I can’t fathom a single reason why Trump should make himself vulnerable to attacks of “another tax break for the rich!” just to make ideologues feel better about tax fairness. On a political level, the fact it is for the middle and worker class is just a brilliant move. It wins these people over, pulls the rug from beneath the Democrats, and attracts women. On a practical level, someone making 250k per year has no need of a children’s tax break. These people aren’t the ones going broke from medical costs. Regular Americans are. Why give them something they don’t need just to satisfy some abstract economic ideology? We have bigger priorities to fight right now, and this plan helps solve real problems Americans are having.

77 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:49:20 PM by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)

Smeep posted:

In case you had any doubt Freep would immediately be on board with Trump's exciting new child care plan.

quote:

To: PGR88

Married women vote Republican as a whole. It is the SINGLE women who keep these creeps in power. That is the only major segment of the whole population which does not support Donald.


29 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:08:39 PM by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)

Smeep posted:

Although my initial reaction was to oppose this, on second thought, I support this. Although I believe it is something that the government should pay for.

The government need to support middle class, working families,and encourage them to have children.

Because of the tough economic times, middle class families are not having children. This is hurting the US. The only ones having children today are those on welfare. or the illegals.

The government needs to do something to encourage the educated, middle class to have children, and discourage those on welfare from having children.

16 posted on 9/13/2016, 2:42:03 PM by Cowboy Bob

Twelve by Pies posted:

I can't make heads or tails of this nonsense.

quote:

Until then it’s in our national security to breed good intelligent hard working educated citizens.

quote:

To: Despot of the Delta

Trump is like chemotherapy. Lots of side effects, but amongst our only chances to fight the cancer.

My girlfriend had lots of chemotherapy and lots of side effects. She died anyway.

82 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:53:02 PM by Maceman (Screw the Party. Save the Country.)

quote:

Our medical costs are insane, easily 2x to 4x what the Europeans are paying. The medical care industry has us by the balls and there is no plan that anyone is offering to get them to let go. We are not living in a Libertarian-Economic utopia over here, with Trump screwing it up by adding a tax cut for your medical care expenses. We’re living in America 2016 where everyone is trying their best to screw us.

Smeep posted:

sweet jesus

Twelve by Pies posted:

And yet you fuckers oppose universal health care at EVERY GODDAMN TURN.

quote:

When I was growing up as a child in the sixties and early seventies we had an elderly housekeeper. She was paid to keep the house, prepare the meals, and provide discipline if needed. Unfortunately, the gooberment saw the need to compel my mom and dad to pay FICA, un-employment, social security, state and other taxes on her employment. This caused my mom and dad to release her from our home because it became too expensive. It was sad to see her go for she was with us for 16 years.
If the income of home care employees could be exempted from this tax burden more and more mature adults could be “employed” to help with families.
It is a win win for the home care person and the families of the United States of America.

52 posted on 09/13/2016 5:28:05 PM PDT by Demanwideplan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

quote:

A little Socialism is better than a lot of Clinton Communism.

50 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:26:47 PM by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)

quote:

Clinton Communism

Badera posted:

the article posted:

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a retired four-star general who served under three Republican presidents, slammed GOP nominee Donald Trump as a “a national disgrace” and an “international pariah,” according to his personal emails seen by BuzzFeed News.

The remarks came in a June 17, 2016, email to Emily Miller, a journalist who was once Powell’s aide. In that same email Powell also said Trump “is in the process of destroying himself, no need for Dems to attack him. [Speaker of the House] Paul Ryan is calibrating his position again.”
[...]
In an Aug. 21 email from Powell to Miller, he blasted Trump for embarking on a “racist” movement that believes President Obama was not born in the US.
“Yup, the whole birther movement was racist,” Powell wrote. “That’s what the 99% believe. When Trump couldn’t keep that up he said he also wanted to see if the certificate noted that he was a Muslim.”

Powell told BuzzFeed News, “I have no further comment. I’m not denying it.”

“As I have said before, ‘What if he was?’ Muslims are born as Americans everyday,” Powell wrote to his former aide.
[...]
“And Ailes as an advisor wont heal women, don’t you think?” Powell wrote.

In an email from May of this year, with the subject line “racism,” Powell reiterated a position he had taken in that past, writing, “Or as I said before the 2012 election, ‘There is a level of intolerance in parts of the Republican Party.’”

And in a December 2015 email to CNN anchor Fareed Zakaria, Powell recounted his aversion to speaking about Trump to the press, writing, “You guys are playing his game, you are his oxygen. He outraged us again today with his comments on Paris no-go for police districts. I will watch and pick the timing, not respond to the latest outrage.”

In another email, Powell wrote to a recipient about his aversion to giving Trump any more media attention: “To go on and call him an idiot just emboldens him.”

In a July 21, 2015, email, in response to a news article about Trump’s giving out US Sen. Lindsey Graham’s phone number, Powell called it a “Celebrification of society,” adding that “Trump has no sense of shame.”

quote:

Hey Colon, crawl back under your rock, you're the 'national disgrace' that let Scooter Libby take the fall.

1 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:17:32 PM by jazusamo

quote:

To: jazusamo

Ahem, Colon, you are the one who told Hillary how to evade email constraints, illegally.


2 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:19:26 PM by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")

quote:

To: jazusamo

Translation ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiNNBc557OQ&index=27&list=RDhRVOOwFNp5U


4 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:19:34 PM by soycd

quote:

To: jazusamo

Brilliant. Thanks for reaffirming yourself as an affirmative action hire


5 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:20:23 PM by Mjreagan

quote:

To: ConservativeMind

Powell was a 2 bit piece of crap during Viet Nam, and he has not changed! He is garbage!


7 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:21:30 PM by MagUSNRET

quote:

To: jazusamo

Affirmative action degenerate.


8 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:21:37 PM by PGalt

quote:

To: jazusamo

The Clinton check just showed up


11 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:22:12 PM by butlerweave

quote:

To: jazusamo

After spending a couple weeks under the Clinton bus, he’s still on the plantation. Amazing.


15 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:23:25 PM by Huskrrrr

quote:

To: jazusamo

His mama named him after the wrong organ. He should’ve been called Anus Powell.


27 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:26:54 PM by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)

quote:

To: jazusamo

It never fails. No matter how these entitlement welfare affirmative action types get smeared, raped or shot in their own Hillary ghettos, they still will root for their entitlement master and the biscuits. They have no self respect and pride, just groveling.


30 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:28:08 PM by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)

quote:

To: jazusamo

Colin Powell knows how to stay on the porch.


34 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:29:30 PM by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)

quote:

To: jazusamo

““As I have said before, ‘What if he was?’ Muslims are born as Americans everyday,” Powell wrote “

Says it all


48 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:36:10 PM by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)

quote:

To: jazusamo

Trump has one interesting trait, in that he continually gets people to out themselves in public.

The guy is a lightening rod for Leftists, Right wing radio talk show hosts, the news media, talking heads, the RNC, the GOPe, other Republicans, and even wanna-be Conservatives.

If he did nothing else but draw out our enemies and closet Liberals I would praise him.


60 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:56:23 PM by DoughtyOne (Fifty-six days until we take measures to end this nightmare. Trump, for the Free World...)

quote:

To: jazusamo

Actually, if I were Trump, I would call Powell - privately, off the record. I would clarify to Powell what I stand for, tell him that the last thing I would ever be, or have ever been is a racist, and would emphasize to him what I wanted to do for the military and for veterans. I would then thank him for his service, tell him I respect his decisions, choices, and allegiances. That’s it. End of story. Maybe that’s pointless, but Powell is so far off the mark that I feel someone has to remind him that it was a Republican President who trusted him.


63 posted on 9/13/2016, 6:03:10 PM by pieceofthepuzzle

quote:

To: jazusamo

A progressive is a progressive is a progressive.

““Yup, the whole birther movement was racist,” Powell wrote”

What a racist prick! And it was Hillary who floated the idea


71 posted on 9/13/2016, 6:17:10 PM by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")

quote:

To: jazusamo

Now the impact of his major announcement that he will be endorsing Hillary will be severely muted. D@mn@ble globalist Soros stooge!


77 posted on 9/13/2016, 6:22:31 PM by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)

quote:

To: jazusamo

What if Obama is muslim? How about the lie he told when he ran as a Christian? He would never have been elected as a muslim. Though we know Powell would have voted for him.

Powell, another gift from the Bushes. I despise them all.


89 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:28:33 PM by Terry Mross (This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)

the article posted:

Facebook, Twitter and news organizations including Agence France-Presse have joined a coalition of media and technology groups seeking to filter out online misinformation and improve news quality on social networks.

First Draft News, which is backed by Google, announced Tuesday that some 20 news organizations will be part of its partner network to share information on best practices for journalism in the online age.
[...]
"Filtering out false information can be hard. Even if news organizations only share fact-checked and verified stories, everyone is a publisher and a potential source," she said in a blog post.
[...]
Sargent said the coalition will develop training programs and "a collaborative verification platform," as well as a voluntary code of practice for online news.

"We live in a time when trust and truth are issues that all newsrooms, and increasingly the social platforms themselves, are facing," she said.
[...]
The partner network includes Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, The New York Times, Washington Post, BuzzFeed News, CNN, ABC News of Australia, ProPublica, AFP, The Telegraph, France Info, Breaking News, Le Monde's Les Decodeurs, International Business Times UK, Eurovision News Exchange and Al Jazeera Media Network.

Other organizations in the network include Amnesty International, European Journalism Centre, American Press Institute, International Fact Checking Network and Duke Reporters' Lab."

quote:

To: NormsRevenge

Given who’s not involved, this is just an admission that liberal biased news organizations have been colluding for years to slant the news. Ought to be a lawsuit in there somewhere.


6 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:25:17 PM by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)

quote:

To: NormsRevenge

And obama turns over the web in 17 days.

hmm.

It is theoretically possible to shut down Trump support on social media and have Tass, er, the MSM try to destroy him.

We dont need MSM. And they do such little damage because they’re dinosaurs.

Social media we need. I use it a lot to get messages from here to those sites.

And unless they block me I will keep doing that.

If they make it illegal, some hacker will find a way in and we’ll (me too) will post again.

And if prison (unlikely) is in the cards, so what.

What better reason to be arrested than fighting for your country


7 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:25:30 PM by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)

quote:

To: LostPassword

I’more worried about what they consider “online misinformation”. Who fact checks the fact checkers?


8 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:28:13 PM by pfflier

quote:

To: All

If we consider what the liberal Mediascum consider appropriate “news” and information, we can expect this effort to become a monstrosity of liberal censorship of competing viewpoints, a filtering out of inconvenient facts and events, etc.

Just imagine the Hillary or Obama campaign staffs determining what should be allowed in “First Draft News” ...... that is about what this project will amount to, extremely dangerous !!!


11 posted on 9/13/2016, 8:24:02 PM by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")

quote:

To: NormsRevenge

I’ve got an IDEA.

If I JOIN freely a social network, let me pick (with checkmarks, opting in) 20 “news” sources I trust. And let me BLOCK everbody else who is a JOURNOLIST who conspires with other news agencies to run press conferences as a racket where the journalist all agree on the topics and tone together beforehand and even select the questioners. ALL of this was already exposed in past elections.

F&ckerberg can ZUCK off.


13 posted on 9/13/2016, 8:39:05 PM by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)

quote:

To: Mariner

At this point Fascistbook has admitted that they no longer are a “common carrier” and that even “pay to play” sponsorship of content doesn’t get you seen by your audience (commercial fraud).

Bust this communist monopoly and kick him in the nuts 2 times.


14 posted on 9/13/2016, 8:41:58 PM by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)

quote:

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.
The Journolist racket years ago showed they colluded on news.

The Abu Ghrab photos were collusion between the DNC and the media. The Waco National Guard forged documents were collusion between the DNC and the media. The faggots in 2006 (toe tapper and the sexter) were evidence of an October Surprise colluded by the DNC and media to “expose a culture of corruption that rises to the top ranks of the party”.

FUMSMDNCCPUSA.


16 posted on 9/13/2016, 8:44:40 PM by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)

quote:

To: NormsRevenge

I attempted to send a lot of images of 9/11/2001 on 9/11/2016 via my Microsoft Hotmail account to my distribution list. I was unsuccessful. Within the last 2 weeks Microsoft distributed a memo saying it was going to start censoring e-mails with terrorist and violent content.

quote:

http://microsoft.com/en-us/servicesagreement/upcoming.aspx
3. Code of Conduct.
•a. By agreeing to these Terms, you’re agreeing that, when using the Services, you will follow these rules:
◦iv. Don’t publicly display or use the Services to share inappropriate Content or material (involving, for example, nudity, bestiality, pornography, graphic violence, or criminal activity).
vii. Don’t engage in activity that is harmful to you, the Services, or others (e.g., transmitting viruses, stalking, posting terrorist content, communicating hate speech, or advocating violence against others).

POTUS #44 BHO has ordered the U.S. to relinquish control of the internet to an international group effective 9/30/2016. FreeRepublic has posted several links about FaceBook which has been censoring conservative news and conservative political postings. George Orwell was a little premature in his prediction regarding Big Brother back in 1949. 1984 finally arrived in 2016.

19 posted on 9/13/2016, 10:08:11 PM by MacNaughton (" ...it is better to die on the losing side than to live under Communism." Whitaker Chambers)

quote:

To: Reverend Wright

Saw an “arts” group” today promoting this piece of bullstalin. Watch how years are smooshed and a hysterical hockeystick (that doesn't exist) is shoved up the rump of those who'd “deny” their cartoons.

[XKCD 1732, the tall one about climagte change, snipped]

20 posted on 9/13/2016, 10:09:13 PM by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)

McGlockenshire posted:

I may be back after adjusting my blood:alcohol ratio.

quote:

To: bobsunshine

As I see it the working man and woman has 2 jobs when they have children. People on welfare and Social Security have none. Workers should be our first priority. Takers come second.


3 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:48:11 PM by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

I know, FReepers...I know. Not constitutional. Feds shouldn't be involved in this crap.

Big picture folks. Let's win the WH first, then we can debate and pressure our Congresscritters to modify or block this.

4 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:48:31 PM by Extremely Extreme Extremist (TRUMP THAT BEYOTCH!)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

I dont like progressive taxes of any kind.

What did the people making 250k or more do to deserve not getting it? Go to school and work hard?

It is what it is.


7 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:50:46 PM by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

Repeal the 16th.


11 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:54:44 PM by Ray76 (Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!)

quote:

To: DIRTYSECRET

As I see it, I didn’t tell them to have kids.

Six weeks for what reason? Have you ever been on the working twice as hard part of this equation.


12 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:55:34 PM by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

Oh vey ... Ivanka is giving a pinko-commie-lib argument for enlarging government to oversee family child care .... what the hell are you doing Trump?

YOU HAVE HILLARY ON THE ROPES FREAKING FINISH HER OFF ALREADY !!!!

14 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:56:07 PM by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

He needs the woman vote to win.

It’s not a bad thing and it brings in more younger women.

As others above said, he has to win - and this is likely what it will take.

Yes, he has Hillary on the edge and he’s pushing her over now. He’s a winner and will do what it takes and this IS what it takes.


19 posted on 9/13/2016, 4:59:03 PM by ozarkgirl

quote:

To: bobsunshine

A tool for winning. Appropriating the family-child care issiue from the Democrats the same way he appropriated the Republican party out from under Romney and Cruz. Brilliant!


36 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:18:02 PM by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)

quote:

To: dp0622

I agree. Moms should stay home, and take care of their children. Dad’s should support them. Then there would be no need for this. Of course, the left has destroyed that for all time as they have destroyed many things that were good.


42 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:22:03 PM by jonathonandjennifer

quote:

To: bobsunshine

So we’re back to the same old same old of offering people free stuff to buy their votes thing again.

When will Republicans learn they will never be able to outbid the Democrats/Socialists?

Answer: probably not until they lose a bunch of voters who will not vote for either socialists or socialist-lite.


43 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:22:13 PM by Truthsearcher

quote:

To: Beernoser

Expanding the earned income tax credit for families who pay no income tax.

What’s not to like?

Goldman Sachs and the open borders barons raping Main Street.

What’s not to like?


45 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:23:01 PM by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)

quote:

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

A little Socialism is better than a lot of Clinton Communism.


50 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:26:47 PM by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)

quote:

To: DIRTYSECRET

Yeah, but the libtards will insist the welfare recipients should get paid for taking care of their kids, too. It is only fair... If we can put a man on the moon... For the children.... Women and children affected most...


51 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:27:54 PM by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)

quote:

To: TheTimeOfMan

With ALL of the tax credits given to YUGE corporations all though I don’t like government involved in helping people to raise their own children why not help middle class people and take some tax deductions from corporations many of the loop holes from corporations NEED to be closed!!!


64 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:35:23 PM by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)

quote:

To: morphing libertarian

The corruptocrats are skimming a Trillion a year from the economy for the last seven years. Putting and end to this will be a big help.


68 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:37:45 PM by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)

quote:

To: Valpal1

Bring back the private orphanage, when children had a future.


69 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:39:35 PM by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)

quote:

To: Demanwideplan

funny you say that - ‘cause off prompter he mentioned about elderly family members doing the child-care would also get the tax credit. This, to me, is a win for keeping families together.


70 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:41:43 PM by time4good

quote:

To: SecondAmendment

I believe the optics of this goes directly to finishing her off. This comes off as caring and yes...more government money BUT it is a small program - consider it low hanging political fruit. It takes votes directly from Hillary. Smart move imo.

The Dems are always promising stuff to get into the WH. How about we beat them at their own game for once. Get in the WH first, worry about this later...


78 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:49:54 PM by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)

quote:

To: dynoman

Lots of waste and fraud done by illegals and refugees, so that’s a good start.


79 posted on 9/13/2016, 5:50:02 PM by Rusty0604

quote:

To: fuzzylogic

But Ivanka started in with that “we are the only industrialized country who doesn’t do X” crap ... The Donald should have just stuck with tax deductions and left it there.


86 posted on 9/13/2016, 6:03:01 PM by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

Ivanka just said while on with Kelly, “we have to expand leave”. Huh??? No, we don’t. This is a democrat way of thinking. And, who is the “we” she is referring to? It is the taxpayers, and we are already $20 trillion in debt.

While this may help win the election, helping people get child care is not a legitimate duty or role of the our limited Federal Government. Just as it is not the place of the federal government to force people to buy health insurance. This is so frustrating, when Republicans are forced to try to “out-entitle” the dems.


88 posted on 9/13/2016, 6:15:00 PM by mtrott

quote:

To: bobsunshine

He’s throwing the libs a bone. Hopefully, the EITC potion of this (welfare) will never see the light of day.


99 posted on 9/13/2016, 7:21:15 PM by pissant ((Deport 'em all))

quote:

To: Beernoser

*Shrug*

We’re standing on the edge of a cliff, friend. Trump is the only possible rope with which we might be able to be rescued. Any other option involves horrible death.

I’m willing to compromise on relatively unimportant matters in exchange for not letting Hillary imprison me for life for my faith or not getting my head whacked off by Islamic nutjobs.

And despite this, Trump’s platform is STILL the most conservative that we’ve had since 1984 and perhaps longer.


101 posted on 9/13/2016, 8:59:10 PM by Luircin (Stomp Hillary, build wall, stop Islam. Any of the above are good reasons to vote. Trump 2016)

quote:

To: bobsunshine

How long have dems wanted this European socialist nanny state idea? Some conservative this guy will be, just like people told you in the primaries. We have voted in a blue dog democrat or better yet a rino and Republicans are going to call him conservative when he is no where near what we are supposed to stand for, but you people have fallen for the hate Bush II propaganda.

People have no memory or logic and propaganda easily persuades them. Yes, I understand this is a globalist vs American election not conservative vs liberal one but America is done either way, just slower enslavement to the state instead of fast enslavement to the new world order. Either way you are enslaved.

103 posted on 9/13/2016, 9:38:35 PM by Lady Heron

quote:

Hillary's medical history is the cover story of the latest newsstand and Kindle edition of the National Enquirer. Anyone who walks through a U.S. supermarket checkout line and can read the English language now knows Hillary's got medical problems. The National Enquirer is today more reliable a source of facts than are most of the main stream media.

A big irony of tabloid journalism is that truth has indeed become stranger than fiction.

1 posted on 9/13/2016, 10:23:31 PM by Seeing More Clearly Now

quote:

To: Seeing More Clearly Now; All

"The National Enquirer is today more reliable a source of facts than are most of the main stream media."

Excellent observation! /not sarc

2 posted on 9/13/2016, 10:27:51 PM by Amendment10

quote:

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

Looks like the Clintons weren’t able to get to the NE.


6 posted on 9/13/2016, 10:32:20 PM by Ken H (Best election ever!)

quote:

quote:

To: All

Hey, Jokes on somebody’s politics is one thing.

This is a physically sick individual here through her faults.

Remeber, Just one judge.

16 posted on 9/13/2016, 10:45:19 PM by 80skid

Bid Laden was sick too so go pet a unicorn over a rainbow some place else.

20 posted on 9/13/2016, 11:00:47 PM by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative.)

quote:

To: Byron_the_Aussie

I saw a pic today showing Ronald Reagan took a bullet and still didn’t collapse like that.


23 posted on 9/13/2016, 11:25:29 PM by HollyB

quote:

To: Amendment10

And Pravda is reliable as well, who would have thought so back in 1980?? Also pretty accurate are the British tabloids.....


25 posted on 9/13/2016, 11:49:32 PM by Frank_2001

McGlockenshire posted:

To: Byron_the_Aussie

I saw a pic today showing Ronald Reagan took a bullet and still didn’t collapse like that.


23 posted on 9/13/2016, 11:25:29 PM by HollyB

McGlockenshire posted:

Oh my god, Revealed at Last: Hillary's Full Medical File posted by freeper Seeing More Clearly Now.

VitalSigns posted:

Freep is obsessed with the declining birth rate of whites, yet any suggestion that investing in childcare for working parents is a better use of funds than another tax cut for the top 0.1% is met with "no if your pay sucks you don't get to have kids, losers!"

Even the loving Nazis were smart enough to figure out that you have to help out families if you want more white babies.

unwantedplatypus posted:

One question I'd like to ask freepers, more than anything else, is "Who would you consider a moderate?" Or alternatively "What would a moderate position on [issue] look like?"

Helen Highwater posted:

I'm a moderate and my views are moderate positions. Anyone who disagrees with me is a dangerous extremist.