- Lemming
- Apr 21, 2008
-
|
It seems like despite the fact that the FCC rules about Net Neutrality were struck down due to a technicality and not a limitation on how the FCC can regulate ISPs, well, it turns out the FCC didn't want those rules anyway:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html
quote:The Federal Communications Commission will propose new rules that allow Internet service providers to offer a faster lane through which to send video and other content to consumers, as long as a content company is willing to pay for it, according to people briefed on the proposals.
The proposed rules are a complete turnaround for the F.C.C. on the subject of so-called net neutrality, the principle that Internet users should have equal ability to see any content they choose, and that no content providers should be discriminated against in providing their offerings to consumers.
The F.C.C.'s previous rules governing net neutrality were thrown out by a federal appeals court this year. The court said those rules had essentially treated Internet service providers as public utilities, which violated a previous F.C.C. ruling that Internet links were not to be governed by the same strict regulation as telephone or electric service.
The new rules, according to the people briefed on them, will allow a company like Comcast or Verizon to negotiate separately with each content company – like Netflix, Amazon, Disney or Google – and charge different companies different amounts for priority service.
That, of course, could increase costs for content companies, which would then have an incentive to pass on those costs to consumers as part of their subscription prices.
Hail Satan.
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2014 23:31
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2024 11:38
|
|