|
Kalman, to me this FCC piece seems to basically back up what you've said. The FCC are coming back to rejustify the right way and everyone who flipped out about r.i.p. net neutrality was being a little knee-jerk. But this PK piece still finds issue with the language of the FCC. The Public Knowledge article isn't so much technical as it is speculative, could you elaborate a little on the Title II option they advocate? The basic difference seems to be between relying on a "'commercially unreasonable' test" and banning "unjust and unreasonable discrimination" on internet traffic. Is there something critically lacking without that last bit? Unjust and unreasonable discrimination could easily be part of a commercially-unreasonable test right? I can't tell if PK has a good point or are just really really scared about the issue as a whole.
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2014 22:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 14:13 |
|