Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Not sure how well it works in 4e, but I've had good results in other games by giving each player a "sidekick" character in addition to their main one. That way they're not dealing with missing party roles, and you can just encounters for four characters as-written.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Arguing that both of them are mutually flanked, and thus neither of them can provide a flanking bonus to an ally, is fairly reasonable.

Claiming that the situation is somehow asymmetric is kind of :wtf: though.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply