|
Why aren't cable companies allowed over each others lines? I mean, you could get DSL and phone service from multiple companies, why not cable? Some sort of sweetheart deal they struck with the government about laying down their own infrastructure over the years (which I'm sure was probably heavily subsidized...)?
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2014 00:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 01:00 |
|
Cenodoxus posted:Mainly because cable carriers own the entire local loop and hate competitors. It's also tricky (if not impossible) to compete over the same cable infrastructure because cable is a shared medium - one end of the fiber is connected to the CMTS at the cable company's central office, and the other end of the fiber is in a tiny box on your street where it's converted to coax and shared with the entire block. I knew that Cable was a shared bandwidth medium, I guess I just forgot to connect the dots on that point. Also now that you mentioned the whole thing about municipalities, I remember how Verizon and Cablevision got into lawsuits and slapfights in my area over local exclusivity deals in certain towns and such when Verizon was heavily rolling out their fiber. The result is that I can get FIOS Internet and phone, but not TV. Man, this poo poo fuckin' sucks. This merger is going to gently caress so many people over (even more than they're being hosed over now).
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2014 02:06 |