Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Philosopher King
Oct 25, 2006
Wait is this relavent again?

:lost:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Philosopher King
Oct 25, 2006
So what are the Vegas odds on the plane being used later to carry explosives/hostages and slamming that poo poo into a major city?

Philosopher King
Oct 25, 2006

Warrahooyaargh posted:

Wouldn't they would have just done that right away though? If you've hijacked a plane, you've already got a flying bomb. There's no need to land it, deal with the passengers (presumably by killing them), re-load it with explosives and take off again with everybody looking out for a rogue airliner. I suppose it's possible, but it seems like an awful lot of trouble for something that could have been done with the airliner full of fuel not long after takeoff from Kuala Lumpur.

Well if you want to load it up with a nuke and detonate it over a city wouldn't that be more effective than taking out a single building?

  • Locked thread