|
Not caring about fonts is the cool thing to do
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 02:30 |
|
|
FlapYoJacks posted:Not caring about fonts is the cool thing to do 
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 01:18
|
|
|
Counterpoint: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 02:03
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yXlLOKqjpc NVK running Control at respectable framerates RTX OFF of course, and the driver isn't at the point where they're doing any serious perf work yet but like, it works. You can already play graphically intensive games with it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 05:33
|
|
|
FlapYoJacks posted:Not caring about fonts is the cool thing to do I can read letters in almost any font idk maybe it's a skill issue
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 06:55
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yXlLOKqjpc cool
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 07:13
|
|
|
my friend told me he was getting into this linux thing and had downloaded a thing called gentoo cause he was on dialup and it was a smaller download compiling stuff from binaries than downloading an OS in one piece... he still uses it today. Was good to just dive head first in high school and learn how it works. Horsebanger fucked around with this message at 08:06 on Apr 19, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 08:02
|
|
|
still waiting for it to compile
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 11:35
|
|
Associate Christ
|
udev-hid-bpf: quickstart tooling to fix your HID devices with eBPF
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 13:03
|
|
|
c btrfs s: filesystem corruption on my NAS, lost 3 TB of TV shows lmao. dogshit filesystem
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:05
|
|
|
Kazinsal posted:c btrfs s: filesystem corruption on my NAS, lost 3 TB of TV shows lmao. dogshit filesystem well that was dumb.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:10
|
|
|
ext4 stays winning
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:11
|
|
|
Kazinsal posted:c btrfs s: filesystem corruption on my NAS, lost 3 TB of TV shows lmao. dogshit filesystem just checked and, yep, all the linux isos on my NTFS drives are totally fine. glad i paid for my file system instead of grabbing a free one off the internet
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:17
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:just checked and, yep, all the linux isos on my NTFS drives are totally fine. glad i paid for my file system instead of grabbing a free one off the internet everything surviving is getting moved over to a windows box because at least SMB works right 100% of the time that way and I haven't had LVM kill any disks yet
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:18
|
|
|
i use btrfs on top of lvm on top of mdraid, works4me. all my important stuff resides on at least one high-TBW ssd mirror tho. idk why you're talking about smb as an alternative to btrfs?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:28
|
|
|
*sits on tree stump* Got my start on Debian Woody because my laptop at the time ran like poo poo on Windows. The goddamn thing didn't even have a wifi radio, so I had to use a PCMCIA card, which was high technology at the time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:43
|
|
|
orinoco gold hell yeah
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:47
|
|
|
oh yeah I remember connecting some orinoco crap to a sharp zaurus back when i was a childe good poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:53
|
|
|
once you get into the flow it's like the packets just sail away
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:54
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:once you get into the flow it's like the packets just sail away
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 21:58
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:orinoco gold hell yeah i had one of these in the form of an airport pcmcia card i had to unscrew the bottom of my imac to install. popped more ram in it while i was in there too 
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:01
|
|
|
Kazinsal posted:c btrfs s: filesystem corruption on my NAS, lost 3 TB of TV shows lmao. dogshit filesystem  Jonny 290 posted:i use btrfs on top of lvm on top of mdraid, works4me. good luck, i guess smb isn't an alternative to btrfs, there's only one and it's not going to help now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:03
|
|
|
Let us know how bcachefs works out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:06
|
|
|
i'm using btrfs because that's what synology uses
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:06
|
|
|
filesystems should filesystem volume managers should volume manage raid should raid
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:06
|
|
|
ok boomer
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:15
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:filesystems should filesystem there's no indication that it's possible to separate them out to maintain the functionality in the one implementation that does all those things.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:22
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:unfortunately nobody has designed something that's both three separate parts, and also a transactionally atomic system with a hashtree of data+metadata+checksums using dynamically allocated nodes without severely degrading performance doesn't APFS kinda work this way e: like idk if it does, i've only read high level overviews because i generally don't care about filesystems
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:24
|
|
|
i think the answer is zfs but lmfao
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:27
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:doesn't APFS kinda work this way the 10 part series on Adam Leventhal's blog posted:There are some seemingly absent or ancillary design goals: performance, openness, and data integrity. Squeezing the most IOPS or throughput out of a device probably isn’t critical on watchOS, and it’s relevant only to a small percentage of macOS users. It will be interesting to see how APFS performs once it ships (measuring any earlier would only misinform the public and insult the APFS team). The APFS development docs have a bullet on open source: “An open source implementation is not available at this time.” I don’t expect APFS to be open source at this time or any other, but prove me wrong, Apple. If APFS becomes world-class I’d love to see it in Linux and FreeBSD–maybe Microsoft would even jettison their ReFS experiment. My experience with OpenZFS has shown that open source accelerates that path to excellence. It’s a shame that APFS lacks checksums for user data and doesn’t provide for data redundancy. Data integrity should be job one for a file system, and I believe that that’s true for a watch or phone as much as it is for a server.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 22:59
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:filesystems should filesystem
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 14:32
|
|
|
dont use btrfs on lvm
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 15:04
|
|
|
Tankakern posted:dont use btrfs on lvm *nods with complete understanding*
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 15:06
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:just checked and, yep, all the linux isos on my NTFS drives are totally fine. glad i paid for my file system instead of grabbing a free one off the internet
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 15:40
|
|
|
I will continue using ext4 until ext5 or the heat death of the universe happens.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 20:19
|
|
|
i've been using xfs for a few years and it's been uneventful
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 20:35
|
|
|
I'm using reiserfs for its killer performance, though it does suffer from the occasional fragmentation issue
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 20:48
|
|
|
imagine even knowing what filesystem you’re using, let alone caring, unless someone’s paying you to
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 21:33
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:imagine even knowing what filesystem you’re using, let alone caring, unless someone’s paying you to Yes, this is the Linux thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 21:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 02:30 |
|
|
i know what fs i'm using (ext4 on linux laptops, apfs on the ios devices [hfs+ on the old ones], ext3 on the router and android devices, ntfs on windows things, exfat on my cameras). i just don't give a gently caress and want it to work and not lose any of my files, without me janitoring it at all and to be fair, most of the above do that. i probably had the most problems with hfs+, but that still wasn't many. i've only lost files due to mechanical failures afaik e: and because of that i've been all solid state in new stuff since 2010, probably eliminated my last spinning hd in 2013 lol e2: oh wait i actually completely lost a drive because of apfs. but that was the beta version, so e3: there is no ext5, i am not from the future 
Beeftweeter fucked around with this message at 21:47 on Apr 20, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 21:39
|
|