Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
cafel
Mar 29, 2010

This post is hurting the economy!

Slaan posted:

In the case of the UK, the textile industry was a heavy driver of their industrialization. To feed the mills for that industry, the British took over places like Egypt and India which were good for both cotton farming and food; this could be considered land reform in that the incoming cash crops lowered agricultural prices at the same time new jobs were opening up in industries like textiles and ship building. It was a much more organic process than we have seen recently, to be sure, though.

Well the British also had much more direct land reform in form of the Inclosure Acts. British industrialization was certainly more organic, but that's doesn't preclude a certain amount of government driving some of the process.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread