|
Article: Beijing to the US by train: China outlines plans to connect world by high speed rail network From: Times of India quote:China has outlined its plan to connect the world by high-speed rail, including an underwater link to the US, running 13,000km. This seemed pretty interesting. I've repeatedly come across the idea that how mountainous and desertified China's west is results in the east being kind of like an island. With that in mind, should I assume it's a safe bet we'll see a lot of wonderful infrastructure projects coming out of China to mitigate that geographic challenge? And while this is being presented as a serious proposal, should it be taken seriously? Accretionist fucked around with this message at 22:21 on May 11, 2014 |
# ¿ May 11, 2014 22:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 5, 2024 18:31 |
|
I'm unfamiliar with rail infrastructure. Should I interpret expanded high-speed rail capacity/networks as implying increased shipping capacity, too? Could I interpret this as reflecting increasing economic integration across central Asia? Also, if the Arctic Circle is going to be as big a deal as I've seen suggested, could this project be thought of as less connecting china to the world than connecting Arctic-adjacent Sino-Russian rail infrastructure to the world? Accretionist fucked around with this message at 22:45 on May 11, 2014 |
# ¿ May 11, 2014 22:41 |
|
Are there untried pie-in-the-sky measures for something like that? Like a small basic.income coupled with steep import tariffs and mandatory workday reductions? "You WILL take time off, you WILL buy domestic and you WILL have more sex; here's some money. Get to it!"
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2015 06:12 |
|
What's the worst case scenario and how likely is it? A stock implosion could topple the housing market and the shadow banking system, too, right?
|
# ¿ Aug 24, 2015 16:05 |
|
By the way, I'm seeing plenty of reporting on stock freezes but not unfreezes. Is 70% of the exchange still frozen?
|
# ¿ Aug 24, 2015 16:14 |
|
I feel like I'm F5-ing history here. It's so close!
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2015 06:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 5, 2024 18:31 |
|
A commodity prices collapse would ruin anyone involved in commodities. China consumes hard-to-describe volumes of raw materials. For example, they used more cement in three years than we used in one-hundred. From 1901 to 2000, the United States used 4.5 gigatons of cement. In 100 years, 4.5 gigatons. From 2011 to 2013, China used 6.6 gigatons of cement. In 3 years, 6.6 gigatons. It's like that for a lot of things.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 15:02 |