Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Flipperwaldt
Nov 11, 2011

Won't somebody think of the starving hamsters in China?



Radiapathy posted:

I've read that some DAWs either lie about peaks or engage some built-in soft-clipping to let users push their signals harder than they should, but if your metering is accurate, you should never touch zero.
The only thing of the kind I've heard of is some DAWs maybe, potentially triggering the clipping light early to help prevent permanently destroyed audio. That's something from Bob Katz' book and I think he's talking about hardware DAWs, where that would make a bit more sense because they don't have the same flexibility and didn't have near infinite storage capacity back then (so you would occasionally bounce things to free up space or tracks).

If it's something that's done in software DAWs today, I have no idea.

Radiapathy posted:

Something I've noticed about Live is that when you use the Normalize option when rendering audio (which just raises the overall volume of the track until the highest peak in the song reaches zero), the rendered track almost always clips, if you analyze it in Audacity or WaveLab. I don't know what Ableton's doing there, but when I use Live these days I'll just aim for a mastered final that's as high as I'm comfortable with in Live, and then just normalize the WAV to -0.3dB in WaveLab after that.
Clip detection is not as an exact science as you'd hope it would be. A value reaching the maximum can (technically, mathematically) be intentional and doesn't need to be an indication information was lost. Iirc, most clipping detection algorithms decide that three subsequent samples at the maximum value very very likely means clipping has occured. But it essentially can only guess; it can't know if information was lost or whether it was never there. Other algorithms play it more safe than sorry and raise the alarm when a single sample reaches the maximum value.

It's like you're looking at a photograph of a painting. Are you seeing part of the painting? All of it? How would you know? If you can see all four edges, then ok, it's all of the painting. Otherwise you may be seeing a small cutout or just the left half or whatever and you wouldn't know for sure. Maybe the photographer just cropped it pretty tight.

Now consider that it's pretty much the point of normalizing to give the highest peak sample the value corresponding with 0dB. It's pretty logical that from a certain point of view that waveform is considered to probably have clipped, almost by default. I don't think there's something particularly weird going on with Live's normalizing.


At 16 bit and expecially if the target medium is MP3, a peak at is indeed -0.3dB is the highest you can 100% safely get away with. MP3 decoding can turn an MP3 made from a WAV that wasn't audibly clipping into distortion, which is why.


In general, if your material has entered the digital domain with a good SNR (recorded from analog optimally or as the output of a vst), the floating point mixing engine in a DAW makes it pretty pointless to toe the 0dB line too closely. Within reason anyway. You may end up with a mix that peaks at -12dB and that's just fine; boosting the digital mixer output by that much afterwards doesn't net you any perceptible quality loss, if any at all. As long as it hasn't left the DAW's mixer. After that, yes, quality loss in theory, in practice: eh. Won't likely be the biggest problem with your mix by a long shot. Respect a healthy headroom so things don't clip and stop worrying about it. Which is why the Bitwig thing totally makes sense.

edit: to clarify: when recording from analog to digital, headroom does matter a lot. But if you're recording/tracking at 24 bit, 6 dB is totally peanuts.

Flipperwaldt fucked around with this message at 20:19 on Mar 28, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dotcom Jillionaire
Jul 19, 2006

Social distortion
Hey who here is traxus12 on Youtube?

I liked the new jam (and the new setup!):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9eq5s4YSeQ

Radiapathy
Dec 3, 2011

Snooping as usual, I see.

Flipperwaldt posted:

Clip detection is not as an exact science as you'd hope it would be. A value reaching the maximum can (technically, mathematically) be intentional and doesn't need to be an indication information was lost. Iirc, most clipping detection algorithms decide that three subsequent samples at the maximum value very very likely means clipping has occured. But it essentially can only guess; it can't know if information was lost or whether it was never there. Other algorithms play it more safe than sorry and raise the alarm when a single sample reaches the maximum value.
I just remembered why I was analyzing my Live renders to begin with. A few times I ran into problems converting rendered WAVs I'd made using Live's Normalize function, where LAME bailed out, reporting errors when attempting to convert them to MP3. That's when I started looking at the WAVs to see what was up. Whether it was a true clip or not, WaveLab, Audacity, and LAME didn't like what they saw. :shrug:

renderful
Mar 24, 2003

You'll love me, I promise.

Dotcom Jillionaire posted:

Hey who here is traxus12 on Youtube?

I liked the new jam (and the new setup!):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9eq5s4YSeQ

I believe that's Skeletron, and I agree that it's quite good.

Flipperwaldt
Nov 11, 2011

Won't somebody think of the starving hamsters in China?



Radiapathy posted:

LAME bailed out, reporting errors when attempting to convert them to MP3.
Yeah, ok, that's pretty weird.

Skeletron
Nov 21, 2005

One day I found out that my urine was acting like a powerful foaming agent.

Dotcom Jillionaire posted:

Hey who here is traxus12 on Youtube?

I liked the new jam (and the new setup!):
Thanks! Yeah, it's-a-me. Hope to be jamming more often now that I've got everything rewired and synced up.

Dotcom Jillionaire
Jul 19, 2006

Social distortion
Yeah it really shows off a lot more gear now that you've re-organized. I noticed the Mackie VLZ mixer. In your old setup you had the Mackie LM 3402 (which I also have). I am in touch with someone on craigslist to buy a 1642-VLZ3 and wondering what your experience has been like with it. The LM is nice and compact (and 16 stereo channels) but having some sliders and all those assignable buses seems like a good choice for live hardware mixing.

Skeletron
Nov 21, 2005

One day I found out that my urine was acting like a powerful foaming agent.

Dotcom Jillionaire posted:

Yeah it really shows off a lot more gear now that you've re-organized. I noticed the Mackie VLZ mixer. In your old setup you had the Mackie LM 3402 (which I also have). I am in touch with someone on craigslist to buy a 1642-VLZ3 and wondering what your experience has been like with it. The LM is nice and compact (and 16 stereo channels) but having some sliders and all those assignable buses seems like a good choice for live hardware mixing.
Oh yeah, I switched to a 1604-VLZ3. If I ever take a simplified version of this rig live, I'd want to have a desktop mixer with faders, which is the main reason I made the switch. It's a bit of a trade-off, but I feel it's worth it. The 1604 has more aux sends, which is wonderful for being creative with multiple hardware effects. Having a Gain knob for each channel in addition to the fader is something I didn't think about before but now I don't think I could live without it. The analog distortion you can get from overloading a channel sounds bloody great. And there's the assignable buses...just a lot more creative options than the LM3204.

The only reason I'd stick with the LM is if I couldn't live without the additional inputs, or having all my synths in stereo was really important to me. Personally, I prefer mono so I can pan elements of the mix left or right. Right now I have too many synths and not enough inputs, but for that I have a patch bay that I'm planning on installing eventually. I know that's going to take me a while to wire up so I'm putting it off for as long as possible. -_-

Just a word of advice...the crappy ribbon cables in these old Mackie desktop mixers tend to need reseating after a while. The gain knob on one of my channels was non-functional at first but I just opened it up, unplugged and plugged the ribbon cable connectors back in on the main board, and the thing works good as new.

Skeletron fucked around with this message at 22:31 on Mar 28, 2014

net work error
Feb 26, 2011

Now I want a Machinedrum even though I'll probably never do any kind of live set. :( Why does this keep happening to me synth thread?

treasureplane
Jul 12, 2008

throwing darts in lovers' eyes, &c.

net work error posted:

Now I want a Machinedrum even though I'll probably never do any kind of live set. :( Why does this keep happening to me synth thread?

The Machinedrum is amazing. Never fails to do the job and do it well. Maybe the only piece of gear I own that I can't imagine parting with.

ziasquinn
Jan 1, 2006

Fallen Rib
I pretty much want all the Elektron products. poo poo is rock solid and awesome.

I got an ipad, and have been screwing around with korg gadget. I have a huge wish-list of synths, but hopefully I can force myself to actually make a song for once with gadget.

Gotta do something...

Digi_Kraken
Sep 4, 2011

treasureplane posted:

The Machinedrum is amazing. Never fails to do the job and do it well. Maybe the only piece of gear I own that I can't imagine parting with.

stop making me want to buy things :gonk:

Dotcom Jillionaire
Jul 19, 2006

Social distortion
Machinedrums are probably at a good price now with the Elektron A4 RYTM coming out

WorldWarWonderful
Jul 15, 2004
Eh?

Your Dead Gay Son posted:

I pretty much want all the Elektron products. poo poo is rock solid and awesome.

I want a Monomachine and an A4 and I saw a Monomachine used for a reasonable price but in my heart of hearts I know it's not an A4. I have FM8 and an OP-1 and I want that analog oomph, and when you toss in Overbridge it's kind of a no-brainer.

It's like my OP-1. It took me about three years to get it but it was inevitable. I'm hoping my Electribe EMX is gonna be a good enough drum box to run alongside it. I've always been awful with percussion, and I basically just rip off bits from songs I like, so it's easy to avoid dedicated drum machines :)

Edit: I'm probably going to sell the Micron I got a couple of weeks ago. I like the sounds it makes but I don't really find it fun to use.

WorldWarWonderful fucked around with this message at 00:47 on Mar 29, 2014

VoodooXT
Feb 24, 2006
I want Tong Po! Give me Tong Po!

Griff Lee posted:

stop making me want to buy things :gonk:

I know what you mean. The Machinedrum is on my list of things to buy and I already have 3 (technically 4) synths.

minidracula
Dec 22, 2007

boo woo boo
So it turns out in a weird way my first hardware synth purchase is going to be a C64 (already bought).

Nah, I probably can't really say that and stick to it with a straight face. I mean, yes, I bought a C64, but I can't in good conscience really consider it my first hardware synth.

Militant Lesbian
Oct 3, 2002

minidracula posted:

So it turns out in a weird way my first hardware synth purchase is going to be a C64 (already bought).

Nah, I probably can't really say that and stick to it with a straight face. I mean, yes, I bought a C64, but I can't in good conscience really consider it my first hardware synth.

You can if you immediately pull out the SID and put it in one of the many SID-synth enclosures out there, like a HardSID. :cool:

Dotcom Jillionaire
Jul 19, 2006

Social distortion
Not a synth question per se, but I've been sampling out all of the sounds from my Roland MC-909 into Ableton. My goal is to output each individual patch and drum hit to its own .wav.

Right now all of the patches are recorded into 4-5 clips of 128 waveforms each. I know I can use Ableton's slice options to cut each patch to a sample on a Drum Rack, but I'm looking for a way to easily cut out each individual sample and save it separately. The samples themselves have about a bar of silence between them, it would be very easy for software to detect the beginning and end of each sound. I'm basically looking for an equivalent to the MPC auto-chop feature but on my Mac. Any suggestions for a way to do this in Ableton/Logic/Audacity or can someone recommend other software?

Digi_Kraken
Sep 4, 2011

Dotcom Jillionaire posted:

Not a synth question per se, but I've been sampling out all of the sounds from my Roland MC-909 into Ableton. My goal is to output each individual patch and drum hit to its own .wav.

Right now all of the patches are recorded into 4-5 clips of 128 waveforms each. I know I can use Ableton's slice options to cut each patch to a sample on a Drum Rack, but I'm looking for a way to easily cut out each individual sample and save it separately. The samples themselves have about a bar of silence between them, it would be very easy for software to detect the beginning and end of each sound. I'm basically looking for an equivalent to the MPC auto-chop feature but on my Mac. Any suggestions for a way to do this in Ableton/Logic/Audacity or can someone recommend other software?

If you don't mind ponying up the cash I think this would solve you a lot of headaches. I'll stand by this endorsement btw, great great samples.

http://www.goldbaby.co.nz/products.html

Radiapathy
Dec 3, 2011

Snooping as usual, I see.

Dotcom Jillionaire posted:

Right now all of the patches are recorded into 4-5 clips of 128 waveforms each. I know I can use Ableton's slice options to cut each patch to a sample on a Drum Rack, but I'm looking for a way to easily cut out each individual sample and save it separately. The samples themselves have about a bar of silence between them, it would be very easy for software to detect the beginning and end of each sound. I'm basically looking for an equivalent to the MPC auto-chop feature but on my Mac. Any suggestions for a way to do this in Ableton/Logic/Audacity or can someone recommend other software?
Oh man, doing that in Live is an exercise in pain. Even if you get all the latency math right, you can still run into problems with samples not lining up right- and sample editing was never Live's strong suit anyway. I also dropped a ton on ReCycle only to find that it works MUCH better with the sample clips included with the demo version than with anything I recorded.

I use SampleRobot for this stuff, and Extreme Sample Converter is a popular alternative.

Things get more complicated when sampling VSTs (gotta deal with plugin hosts, virtual audio cables and crazy latency) but for sampling hardware synths, that's exactly what SampleRobot and ESC are for.

The full SampleRobot is pretty expensive, but you can get "single-X" versions which just export to a single format. (I got the WAV version, considering getting the Kontakt one.)

http://www.samplerobot.com/funktionalitaet.htm
http://www.extranslator.com/

I often use SoX as a final step on samples recorded from hardware/virtual synths, to trim silence at the start and end, and to normalize:
http://sox.sourceforge.net/

Radiapathy fucked around with this message at 23:51 on Mar 29, 2014

minidracula
Dec 22, 2007

boo woo boo

Radiapathy posted:

Oh man, doing that in Live is an exercise in pain. Even if you get all the latency math right, you can still run into problems with samples not lining up right- and sample editing was never Live's strong suit anyway. I also dropped a ton on ReCycle only to find that it works MUCH better with the sample clips included with the demo version than with anything I recorded.

I use SampleRobot for this stuff, and Extreme Sample Converter is a popular alternative.

Things get more complicated when sampling VSTs (gotta deal with plugin hosts, virtual audio cables and crazy latency) but for sampling hardware synths, that's exactly what SampleRobot and ESC are for.

The full SampleRobot is pretty expensive, but you can get "single-X" versions which just export to a single format. (I got the WAV version, considering getting the Kontakt one.)

http://www.samplerobot.com/funktionalitaet.htm
http://www.extranslator.com/

I often use SoX as a final step on samples recorded from hardware/virtual synths, to trim silence at the start and end, and to normalize:
http://sox.sourceforge.net/
I use LiveSlice (and occasionally ReCycle, still) as my go-to for all my slicing and chopping needs. I recommend it.

I'll second SoX as well as a useful tool in the toolbox.

Dotcom Jillionaire
Jul 19, 2006

Social distortion

Griff Lee posted:

If you don't mind ponying up the cash I think this would solve you a lot of headaches. I'll stand by this endorsement btw, great great samples.

http://www.goldbaby.co.nz/products.html

MC-909, not TR-909. Though Goldbaby does have some nice sample packs (this is probably why *everyone* uses them).

I'm gonna give SampleRobot and LiveSlice a whirl and see what they can do. Even though I've got everything set up in live, the recorded samples are just wav files. Can edit them anywhere.

a loathsome bird
Aug 15, 2004

Dotcom Jillionaire posted:

Not a synth question per se, but I've been sampling out all of the sounds from my Roland MC-909 into Ableton. My goal is to output each individual patch and drum hit to its own .wav.

Right now all of the patches are recorded into 4-5 clips of 128 waveforms each. I know I can use Ableton's slice options to cut each patch to a sample on a Drum Rack, but I'm looking for a way to easily cut out each individual sample and save it separately. The samples themselves have about a bar of silence between them, it would be very easy for software to detect the beginning and end of each sound. I'm basically looking for an equivalent to the MPC auto-chop feature but on my Mac. Any suggestions for a way to do this in Ableton/Logic/Audacity or can someone recommend other software?

I'm just starting to get into this too, sampling hardware drum machines through my Mirage and then recording it into Ableton and using the "Slice to MIDI" option. I've done the manual work of trimming ~70 individual samples already, but is there an easy way to output the Sampler template to individual .wav files?

Rageaholic
May 31, 2005

Old Town Road to EGOT

I'm seriously considering going to Guitar Center tomorrow and walking out with a Volca Beats and syncing it to my Microbrute and making analog synth fart jams. Is this a good idea? Y/N

I keep forgetting I have the Microbrute because I don't have any desk space so I have the thing in a laptop case in my closet, and I feel like I need to get some good use out of it to justify that purchase. Plus I've never owned a drum machine before, only a MIDI drum pad controller, and I feel like I need one to play around with. I watched a bunch of videos on the Volca Beats and it looks like a fun toy.

I was looking at the TR-8 too but that's $500 and I'm not sure I have that kind of money to spend on something like that now. Would it make a better first hardware drum machine though? If so I guess I could save my money and get one of those eventually.

Militant Lesbian
Oct 3, 2002
You should get neither, and buy a Rhythm Wolf instead. :getin:

Rageaholic
May 31, 2005

Old Town Road to EGOT

HotCanadianChick posted:

You should get neither, and buy a Rhythm Wolf instead. :getin:
Ahh, right! That's the one! I remember reading about it in I think the last thread (or maybe it was earlier on in this one?), I just couldn't remember what it was called.

$50 more for a more fully featured box that also has a bass synth? Yes. Please.

When are those coming out? I guess I can hold out for that :)

treasureplane
Jul 12, 2008

throwing darts in lovers' eyes, &c.

Rageaholic Monkey posted:

I'm seriously considering going to Guitar Center tomorrow and walking out with a Volca Beats and syncing it to my Microbrute and making analog synth fart jams. Is this a good idea? Y/N

Don't do it. Volca Beats is the only Volca unambiguously not worth purchasing, IMHO. The snare sounds really, really bad -- maybe the worst I've heard on any drum machine.

Speaking of intriguing synths with difficult-to-ignore flaws: has anyone heard anything even remotely decent come out of an OP-1? It's gorgeous and the interface is quite nifty, but judging from the demos I've heard, the sound engines leave something to be desired. Finding it difficult to believe that an $850 luxury synth could sound noticeably worse than a $300 Alesis Micron.

treasureplane fucked around with this message at 07:01 on Mar 30, 2014

renderful
Mar 24, 2003

You'll love me, I promise.
This is beauty out of the OP-1:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iROMOOs-k24

Whether it sounds great or not, it looks hella fun with a very usable set of workflows/functions.

Radiapathy
Dec 3, 2011

Snooping as usual, I see.

Ortazel posted:

I'm just starting to get into this too, sampling hardware drum machines through my Mirage and then recording it into Ableton and using the "Slice to MIDI" option. I've done the manual work of trimming ~70 individual samples already, but is there an easy way to output the Sampler template to individual .wav files?

I started writing a blog post about this several months ago when I had gotten as streamlined a workflow as I could manage to figure out using Live and Sampler, but I kept running into this problem where the attack of some samples would end up at the tail end of samples before them, and the whole process of fixing things was incredibly fiddly.

Here's what I wrote before I gave up that path in favor of SampleRobot: Batch Sampling Drum Kits with Ableton Live

The stuff I was going to describe where it trails off at the end was writing SoX scripts to do a number of things. Took me days to figure that poo poo out.

Avalanche
Feb 2, 2007
What would be a better beginner synth option assuming money (no more than $600) isn't really an issue? The Korg MS20 Mini, or the Arturia Minibrute?

I'm looking for something that I can use independently from a DAW if I want to, but something I can also plug into a DAW with no problem. I want to take music lessons again to build up my theory, but I want a fun instrument that doesn't necessarily require a laptop and a fuckton of wires and other stuff to get working.

I'm guessing the mini? Is there any other beginner synth out there someone could recommend?

WorldWarWonderful
Jul 15, 2004
Eh?

treasureplane posted:

Don't do it. Volca Beats is the only Volca unambiguously not worth purchasing, IMHO. The snare sounds really, really bad -- maybe the worst I've heard on any drum machine.

Speaking of intriguing synths with difficult-to-ignore flaws: has anyone heard anything even remotely decent come out of an OP-1? It's gorgeous and the interface is quite nifty, but judging from the demos I've heard, the sound engines leave something to be desired. Finding it difficult to believe that an $850 luxury synth could sound noticeably worse than a $300 Alesis Micron.

I wrote this and I thought I did a pretty good job of showing the OP-1 off: https://soundcloud.com/adamconcept/departures

I like the sounds in my Micron more, but there is literally nothing like the OP-1 out there and I can guarantee you I'm never getting rid of mine unless I'm at the point of being homeless. It's easy to ignore its flaws because it's fun, and I feel the same about my Electribe EMX. Regarding the OP-1, I know why people think it's flawed but most of the flaws are easily worked around if the user doesn't mind putting in a little effort.

I love my Micron's sounds but I'll likely be selling it because I don't find it fun to use, and it doesn't really fit with how I write music.

WorldWarWonderful fucked around with this message at 11:01 on Mar 30, 2014

Your Computer
Oct 3, 2008




Grimey Drawer
The OP-1 seems neat and all, but I think the biggest negative thing to be said about it is the price. As far as I can see, it's not that expensive because it's a technical marvel, it's that expensive because it's halfway between a synth and a fashion accessory kinda like a lot of Apple products. In other words, a neat toy for rich hipsters.

ashgromnies
Jun 19, 2004

Avalanche posted:

What would be a better beginner synth option assuming money (no more than $600) isn't really an issue? The Korg MS20 Mini, or the Arturia Minibrute?

I'm looking for something that I can use independently from a DAW if I want to, but something I can also plug into a DAW with no problem. I want to take music lessons again to build up my theory, but I want a fun instrument that doesn't necessarily require a laptop and a fuckton of wires and other stuff to get working.

I'm guessing the mini? Is there any other beginner synth out there someone could recommend?

You realize both of those are monophonic(only one note can be played at a time), yes? Just asking because you mentioned taking lessons -- you aren't going to be playing chords on either of those(unless you sample and layer).

ashgromnies
Jun 19, 2004

Your Computer posted:

The OP-1 seems neat and all, but I think the biggest negative thing to be said about it is the price. As far as I can see, it's not that expensive because it's a technical marvel, it's that expensive because it's halfway between a synth and a fashion accessory kinda like a lot of Apple products. In other words, a neat toy for rich hipsters.

It's a technical marvel in the way Apple products are -- the screen on the OP-1 is absolutely beautiful. No one else has bothered putting a screen that nice in a groovebox type device. The fact that Teenage Engineering supplies new instruments via firmware updates is cool too. The size and weight of the device is surprisingly little for such a powerful machine.

At the least, I hope it shows other manufacturers a direction they could be going in. I don't personally think I would buy one, after playing with a friend's for a while. I wound up getting the slightly more expensive Octatrack.

Das MicroKorg
Sep 18, 2005

Vintage Analog Synthesizer

Avalanche posted:

What would be a better beginner synth option assuming money (no more than $600) isn't really an issue? The Korg MS20 Mini, or the Arturia Minibrute?

I'm looking for something that I can use independently from a DAW if I want to, but something I can also plug into a DAW with no problem. I want to take music lessons again to build up my theory, but I want a fun instrument that doesn't necessarily require a laptop and a fuckton of wires and other stuff to get working.

I'm guessing the mini? Is there any other beginner synth out there someone could recommend?

How about a used Nord Rack 2X with a MIDI Keyboard (if you don't have one already)? It's polyphonic and multi-timbral (i.e. you can play different sounds independently at once), easy to program and sounds really good.

This is a demo of the Nord Lead 2X, which is the same as the rack but with a built-in keyboard.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHr1-wwgW_Y

inferis
Dec 30, 2003

Your Computer posted:

The OP-1 seems neat and all, but I think the biggest negative thing to be said about it is the price. As far as I can see, it's not that expensive because it's a technical marvel, it's that expensive because it's halfway between a synth and a fashion accessory kinda like a lot of Apple products. In other words, a neat toy for rich hipsters.

I think everyone who doesn't really get the appeal of one should find a store and at least try it out. The appeal is really apparent when you're actually using it and the workflow is really nice for getting something down fast instead of loving around with a DAW for hours. I even use it on the train during my commute and it's fun.

long-ass nips Diane
Dec 13, 2010

Breathe.

Avalanche posted:

What would be a better beginner synth option assuming money (no more than $600) isn't really an issue? The Korg MS20 Mini, or the Arturia Minibrute?

I'm looking for something that I can use independently from a DAW if I want to, but something I can also plug into a DAW with no problem. I want to take music lessons again to build up my theory, but I want a fun instrument that doesn't necessarily require a laptop and a fuckton of wires and other stuff to get working.

I'm guessing the mini? Is there any other beginner synth out there someone could recommend?

If you want something polyphonic so you can play chords and stuff, I'd buy a Volca Keys and a midi keyboard to play it with. The other suggestions aren't really in your $600 price range (as far as I can tell from googling) unless you get really lucky.

It also has a built in speaker and interface and runs on batteries so you can sit on the couch or wherever and play with it. You could get the keys, an Arturia Microbrute and a lower-end midi keyboard (if you don't want to use the microbrute as a keyboard, which I'm pretty sure you can) and still be under your budget.

I don't think the Keys will be your Perfect Synth Forever, but it should be pretty good for just learning how to make noises. I kinda wish it had been out when I got started.

long-ass nips Diane fucked around with this message at 16:35 on Mar 30, 2014

A Winner is Jew
Feb 14, 2008

by exmarx

Avalanche posted:

What would be a better beginner synth option assuming money (no more than $600) isn't really an issue? The Korg MS20 Mini, or the Arturia Minibrute?

I'm looking for something that I can use independently from a DAW if I want to, but something I can also plug into a DAW with no problem. I want to take music lessons again to build up my theory, but I want a fun instrument that doesn't necessarily require a laptop and a fuckton of wires and other stuff to get working.

I'm guessing the mini? Is there any other beginner synth out there someone could recommend?

I have both the MS-20mini and the Minibrute but my wife is only letting me keep one so once it comes back from getting a new keyboard (the early runs had defective ones) I'll be selling my Minibrute.

That being said I wouldn't recommend an MS-20 as someone's first synth since it doesn't play well with 99% of other synths and recording equipment at all, however if you're looking for something that you can at least play chords and learn on, $600 would get you a used VA synth of which I would recommend an ESQ-1, Ion, or Blofeld if you get lucky.

And if you can wait, my slightly used minibrute will be going up for sale after it comes back fixed for the price of a microbrute. :iamafag:

a loathsome bird
Aug 15, 2004

Radiapathy posted:

I started writing a blog post about this several months ago when I had gotten as streamlined a workflow as I could manage to figure out using Live and Sampler, but I kept running into this problem where the attack of some samples would end up at the tail end of samples before them, and the whole process of fixing things was incredibly fiddly.

Here's what I wrote before I gave up that path in favor of SampleRobot: Batch Sampling Drum Kits with Ableton Live

The stuff I was going to describe where it trails off at the end was writing SoX scripts to do a number of things. Took me days to figure that poo poo out.

This is much easier than the route I used- I bet you could fix the start time problem by shifting the whole track slightly before slicing. How tolerant is SampleRobot for noisy sources? The VCA and AD/DA section on the Mirage all have a really high noise floor.


A Winner is Jew posted:

$600 would get you a used VA synth of which I would recommend an ESQ-1, Ion, or Blofeld if you get lucky.

The ESQ-1 is a digital/analog hybrid, not VA, and a mint example should be ~$300. You can still find beaters for $150, and they are fantastic synths- just watch out for leaky caps in the power supply, mine is currently awaiting a full recap.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Flipperwaldt
Nov 11, 2011

Won't somebody think of the starving hamsters in China?



Wouldn't $600 get him a JP-8000?

I'm sure it's poo poo in some ways, but it should best a Volca Keys at least. Right?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply