|
Texans, I guess?
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 20:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 09:18 |
|
|
I'll take the Jets
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
Since the order is randomly determined and the teams have nothing to do with players either on them now or in the past, can't we just create new ones?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 20:41
|
|
|
I'll do Philly yee haw
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
Raiders. See my name and you know I'm the best man for the job.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 20:49
|
|
|
Chiefs?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 20:53
|
|
|
swickles posted:Since the order is randomly determined and the teams have nothing to do with players either on them now or in the past, can't we just create new ones? Too confusing and not worth it. You can name your own teams whatever you want I guess.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 21:24
|
|
|
Detroit Coney Dog(g)s are ready to rumble (boxing(2)).
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 21:41
|
|
|
It could be fun or also not fun if there was a suggestion to draft at least one franchise connected player per side of the ball.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
Rule #1 is to have fun.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
I'll take the Ravens.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 21:45
|
|
|
The Carolina Vinegar Based Sauces
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:02
|
|
|
Knightmere posted:It could be fun or also not fun if there was a suggestion to draft at least one franchise connected player per side of the ball. I'm trying to figure out who would be screwed the most by this. Tampa's offense?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:10
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I'm trying to figure out who would be screwed the most by this. Tampa's offense? Nah, they can just draft Mike Alstott and Doug Martin and be in good loving shape.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:15
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I'm trying to figure out who would be screwed the most by this. Tampa's offense? Jag's defense?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:16
|
|
|
Sure I'll take the Niners, what the hell.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:26
|
|
|
6 spots left
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:34
|
|
|
Since this is filling up a team that has no players, are you going to do it like a fantasy draft where the pick order reverses each round? e: And I'll take the Saints if no one else wants em. I will surrender them to any Saints fan who does Intruder fucked around with this message at 22:53 on Apr 22, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:43
|
|
|
I will do the Chargers
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 22:54
|
|
|
I would have done the Rams, but just give me anyone I guess. e: give me the Vikings.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 23:36
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I'm trying to figure out who would be screwed the most by this. Tampa's offense? Steve Young was a bust in tampa before he was traded to the niners
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 23:54
|
|
|
Intruder posted:Since this is filling up a team that has no players, are you going to do it like a fantasy draft where the pick order reverses each round? yeppers
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2014 23:59
|
|
|
Fight Club Sandwich posted:Steve Young was a bust in tampa before he was traded to the niners poo poo, he's the guy I always bring up when someone posts early career bad quarterback stats too. Although he's associated with Tampa in the average fan's mind even less than Doug Williams is these days.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
I'll take the Colts why not. For starting offense are we including full back as a mandatory position? Or could we swap that out for a third WR or second TE if we so choose?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 00:38
|
|
|
I'll take the Pats.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 00:40
|
|
|
True dat. Guys you can forgo a 3rd WR for a FB if you want, but the standard is 3 WRs. I'm not going to wait for a person to pick up the bears and will draw the picks then make the thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 01:02
|
|
|
Dibs on Da Bears.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 01:25
|
|
|
For the record I'm going to draft nothing but modern football players because old folks played a much less competitive game and  TOTALLY NOT because I don't know poo poo about pre-1990 football.Honest.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:18
|
|
|
I'm out but I'd just like to say that Elway would be a good first round pick - dude had a monster cannon for an arm, but Jerry Rice should be #1 overall.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
Eifert Posting posted:For the record I'm going to draft nothing but modern football players because old folks played a much less competitive game and Pre-1990? Just load up Tecmo Super Bowl and draft every single good player form there!
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:28
|
|
|
Eifert Posting posted:For the record I'm going to draft nothing but modern football players because old folks played a much less competitive game and You wouldn't draft Munoz as the first left tackle taken? you do not deserve to root for the Bengals.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
Bo Jackson should be #1 overall. Not kidding.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:44
|
|
|
Anthony Who-noz?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 02:44
|
|
|
I hope I draw first so I can make the Best Pick Possible (BPP)
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 03:00
|
|
|
bewbies posted:Bo Jackson should be #1 overall. Not kidding. Jim Thorpe says different  I hope some of you guys have good gimmick teams coming. I say as someone who won't commit to drafting a team.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 03:12
|
|
|
Doltos posted:True dat. Guys you can forgo a 3rd WR for a FB if you want, but the standard is 3 WRs. I'm not going to wait for a person to pick up the bears and will draw the picks then make the thread. Sorry definitely running the wishbone.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 03:16
|
|
|
Edit I am too late
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 03:36
|
|
Eifert Posting posted:For the record I'm going to draft nothing but modern football players because old folks played a much less competitive game and Ok but someone else needs to be the guy who only picks pre-merger players and talks about how they'd completely dominate in the modern game because the rules make the game so much softer now.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 03:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 09:18 |
|
|
I could have made a nice gimmick team that I would have laughed at.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2014 03:41
|
|
