Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
The Maroon Hawk
May 10, 2008

Unfortunately Vermont is still dragging its feet on actually implementing single-payer; the law was signed four years ago and the state still has not produced a budget proposal for paying for it. I just hope they can get their act together soon enough, the single-payer movement in the US is probably going to depend a lot on Vermont's success.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Maroon Hawk
May 10, 2008

redscare posted:

We'll have much bigger problems if we get a President Cruz.

If this works out well in VT, I can see a few other deep-blue states taking a punt. Maybe MA. Or CA if we ever get this corruption under control.

California's legislature passed single-payer twice while Schwarzenegger was governor, only to have him veto it. So it's not out of the realm of possibility, although they haven't even tried since Brown took office so single-payer could very well just be red meat to throw to their base to drum up votes.

  • Locked thread