Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Lyesh posted:

That's pretty much incoherent. The allowance for no contraception coverage with ACA-compliant plans has shown us that it's plenty easy to ignore scientific/medical fact with the ACA.

It's perfectly coherent. It's saying that leftist activities (such as single payer healthcare) are fundamentally flawed if their supporters are total nut bags (such as thinking vaccinations are evil).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Ditocoaf posted:

It's a question of whether you buy that ACA is better at adhering to scientific truth than Single Payer would be. If you don't make the case for that first, the argument is a non-sequitur.

I'm not caught up with the midterms thread, so maybe De Nomolos made that case successfully, and AYC just left that part out when bringing the discussion here?

It was a response to the following statement:

quote:

[The Green Party's] anti-science tendencies make me uncomfortable, but they enough positions I agree with to overlook that.

  • Locked thread