|
why the gently caress would you name your product/service/anything "buttercoin"
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 10:35 |
|
|
with the black background it looks like the one on the left is poking the right one's eyes out
|
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
St Evan Echoes posted:countdown until all ad blocking extensions marked malicious they'll definitely make up some excuse about them modifying page content
|
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2015 19:38
|
|
|
the only site i noscript is arse technical because of their goddamn top banner thing that scrolls with the content and automatically resizes itself at some arbitrary point on the page it sucks because videos dont get displayed and inline pictures (benchmark results etc) open in a new tab
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:couldn't you just block that with an adblock rule not on an ipad. i use glimmerblocker to do it plus adblocking it would gently caress up the design even more i guess
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
theres some things you cant really block though. iirc verizon was using a http header to track mobile data users somehow
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 18:25
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:mobile data users go through heavy natting when on ipv4, and in the routing used there's plenty of room to add additional headers. no i know that, i mean "track somehow" as in i'm not sure how they were able to do it. i'm guessing every page/app they wanted to track would need some js/framework from the ad company
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:someone tell me how to block youtube ads in safari glimmerblocker.org
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 23:45
|
|
|
psssh hahaha thats not a link. made you copy/paste
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 23:45
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:when i sign into any chrome browser on any machine, it remembers the plguins i have installed and automatically downloads and runs adblock its not the ads you should be afraid of, its the company that tracks, analyzes and compiles massive databases of information about literally everything. they even know about your secret preference for bbw hentai
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
youtube is straight up horrible
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:yeah but that posters retort is "google is an advertising company lmfao, not a tech company!! they use that information for advertising. hth
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2015 22:05
|
|
" and nothing to do with that
|
Valeyard posted:yeah but whats the alternative? they are tracking you whether you are signed in or not a big problem is that there aren't many viable free ones for most google services (which got people used to expecting those services for free). i was responding to "why be afraid of ads?" with "its google in general you should be afraid of"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2015 22:20
|
|
|
mishaq posted:doing straight OTT VoIP on cellular data connections would be retarded because the cellular network would just treat the call like any other packet data, low priority and make no effort to preserve the state between handoffs, since packet data can tolerate delays that sure sounds like a googley idea + experience to me i wouldnt be surprised if they routed it all through
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2015 07:21
|
|
|
t-mobile is fine here until you go indoors (i use the free data plan on my ipad), at&t and verizon have no problems as expected and when my brother visits his sprint service is godawful (and lol doesn't roam onto verizon since he uses some lovely mvno) i am maybe 20 minutes away at most from a major metro area
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2015 13:45
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:when i ride the poor bus my 4g reception is at full strength in the particuarly lovely rundown parts of the city some schools here used to jam cell signals before it was strictly illegal, maybe thats why
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
lol google maps is seriously one of the worst offenders with this poo poo, its impossible to quickly change settings in that pos
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:the app is bad enough but the web page is practically lovely ui performance art. which is sad because it used to actually be functional enough
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
The Management posted:everything google gets shitted up with features and rearrangement until it becomes terrible. it feels like there's no one there to tell the engineers when to stop there was, but they "mysteriously" drowned in the ball pit
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:GOOGLE!!!! so that you're forced to use your real name to call people "kike friend of the family faggots" in comments and also to tie your usage statistics to your actual identity. 2 birds one cup
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2015 00:12
|
|
|
instead of giving your patents to a patent holding company, just give them to us http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/04/27/google-to-disarm-trolls-by-buying-patents-before-they-become-weapons/ we'll hold them for you 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
we totally wont use them against anyone. pinky swear
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
And I and plenty of others here assure you it isn't working... here are the facts to prove that... Here are the simple FACTS about this problem... 1: It has nothing to do with "Outdated Browers", that is a FACT already established by the simple FACT it occurs on the latest Browsers as well as the old ones... 2: As has been proven by others here and myself "Google Functions" are working perfectly on FireFox and for other browsers if you switch your "User Agent" to "FireFox"... FACT 3: This problem is specific to Google themselves after the events of the past 48 hours when their image search was hacked... FACT 4: Coincidentally Google themselves that very same day had changed their search function to comply with new EU privacy laws... FACT http://www.thepncvoice.com/authorship-will-shown-google/34825 All the above FACTS points the problem to being either the Hack itself has caused more damage than Google are willing to admit to, or the "fix" they put in place to stop the hack has resulted in the breaking of all Google search functions for all browsers except FireFox. There is also the possibility that this combined with the new search functions Google has had to implement has contributed or is the cause of the problems... The simple overall fact is... It's got nothing to do with our browsers it's down to whatever has happened at Googles end and whether it was the hack , the changes they had to make to the search functions or a combination of both and they are obviously struggling to fix it... The answer Google is looking for of course lies in the FACT that the FIREFOX USER AGENT WORKS, so looking there at what that User Agent does than none of the others do will in fact show Google what they need to change to fix this problem out... Updating all other browsers other than FireFox does not solve this problem as has been proven by plenty of folk, so asking people what browsers or OS they use is pointless and will not help solve this. Google have obviously changed something in their code/ system in the past 48 hours and it is this change/ fix that has broken the system... :-/
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
LastInLine posted:lol i had to google a weird phrase from that to figure out from whence it came and that whole thread is hilarious Please have a good read of the posts here & don't dismiss the angry/vulgar comments left by many- there is no quick fix other than to upgrade your OS. This is an Apple scam, they have clearly paid Google handsomely to get people upgrading to Maverick or nearby. Up to you, but just to suggest you don't comply & join the peoples revolution- cope with it, find another browser, but don't upgrade your Mac until you are ready & feel it a decision made by you for the right reasons, not just to have access to what you had before- its no less than bullying, almost blackmail, & it shouldn't be allowed. Good luck 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
lol i love when people dont know what they're talking about so whatever the issue is quickly devolves into ~CONSPIRACY~
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2015 01:46
|
|
|
info provided by CopyKit
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 16:14
|
|
|
HAIL eSATA-n posted:i don't want to sign in to my goddamn browser with windows 10 you can just sign into your os!! dont worry about it just do it nothing bad could possibly happen
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
i haven't tried gmvault but apparently you can have google archive your gmail account and you just download a tarball or something
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2015 16:52
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:google emitted a response to the deleted accounts thing lol
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2015 14:59
|
|
|
vodkat posted:
audience reaction: "...."
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2015 17:10
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:the sad part is the lower-case g still has a serif lol
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2015 17:11
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:what does this mean apparently a weird mash-up of the font used on the wii/u and futura and weird g-serif is more readable than just plain old catull GoooJle
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
Wheany posted:they're trying to say that sans serif is more legible on small screens, i think they are, but they're wrong. serifs generally help you identify letters better at long distances/small sizes, but most people think san-serif typefaces look better
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:ie 6 was great for a long rear end time. what else were you going to use, crashes-every-hour 0.01 builds of mozilla? netscape 4 from the 90s? opera when you had to pay for it or accept ads in the browser, and it couldn't handle most web standards? qft there really was no alternative for like at least 3 years
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 10:35 |
|
|
The Management posted:they look less crowded, which is important on your small screen. btw, this is Google announcing their "mobile first" pivot. you're talking about a logo that literally looks like it says GoooJle
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2015 18:17
|
|