|
Appears the cold has won.
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 04:47 |
|
|
That's ok, I bet she does too.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2018 23:36
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm confused as to how there was enough demand to even have it available, let alone the price.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2018 21:44
|
|
|
And that man was Isaac Newton.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2018 00:14
|
|
|
Enough with the boo hoo sob story, gimme my goddamn Taylor Swift updates!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
I think part of the complaint was that Saturn appears to be very nearly the same size as Jupiter.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
Screaming Idiot posted:He is basically a superhero. I'm imagining the Husband in King Fu Hustle
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2019 04:59
|
|
|
IMO for that to be bad rear end we need to see that it's a rare skill exhibited by very few other birds. Otherwise it's just something birds can do. Backflips wouldn't be cool if we could all do them, we need to see all the gifs of people absolutely failing at them in order to understand how difficult it is for the lay person. What I'm saying is, show me some videos of birds boofing it into various objects.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2019 18:36
|
|
|
One cool trick to keep you cat from getting run over
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2019 23:44
|
|
|
That one pictured doesn't appear big enough to print a full sized sabretooth skull.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2019 19:55
|
|
|
I'll allow it
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2019 22:35
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:A little old lady throws rocks at the cops in Ecuador Rookie of the Year sequel looking good
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2019 20:13
|
|
|
Just wait till that dude sees the onion volcano
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2019 20:34
|
|
|
small ghost posted:Idk if it counts as badass enough for the thread but there's a video out there of a wedding haka that reduces me to tears every time and I'm not really a wedding crier even when it's someone I know getting married. I agree, but man it's just been kind of exploited in pop culture and sporting events and maybe there's such a thing as too much haka. At some point it loses that humanity you're talking about and it's just a producer going, "You know what would be badass? ANOTHER HAKA"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2020 20:20
|
|
|
Field Mousepad posted:I have never seen a haka anywhere except on YouTube. What are you watching that has them on the reg? Besides rugby I guess. You know, maybe I overstated things a bit. But I do occasionally watch Hawaii football and watching a bunch of white kids forced to haka maybe soured me to it. I avoided watching Hobbs & Shaw specifically because the ads featured the haka so prominently but that movie was better than either of the last couple F&F movies (not saying much) and the haka actually made a little sense there. I won't disparage any genuine haka, I think that since I've only ever seen it done on tv/movies it's always seemed forced.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2020 22:18
|
|
|
Shoplift to feed the poor and they eat for a day, teach the poor to shoplift and they'll eat forever
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2020 17:25
|
|
|
Bro we also do movie theaters.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2021 07:07
|
|
|
Well yeah, because of the implication.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2021 06:53
|
|
|
Xarbala posted:This is a very detailed census "Knot! I meant he has a tiny knot!"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2021 08:12
|
|
|
With all the relativity and light speed stuff I kind of understand that a thing moving at light speed will appear to be moving at light speed to all observers (though I might have stated that badly or maybe I don't actually understand at all) but my question has always been if it's all relative and I'm trying to accelerate to light speed vs my origin, which was already moving at light speed vs some other point in space/time, why can't I ever be actually moving through space at greater than light speed vs that 2nd point? Like say point A and point B are moving away from each other at precisely .5c, relative to each other. If I'm at point A and decide to travel away from point B I am instantly traveling at faster than the speed of light relative to point B, right? Is this wrong? Or is it just a stupid thought experiment because nobody gives a poo poo about what's happening at point B? And if I can travel faster than light speed away from point B that basically means, as far as I understand, my journey could never be directly observed by point B? And what about two points moving toward each other at precisely .5c? Surely I can accelerate toward another body and increase my energy on impact? Inspector 34 has a new favorite as of 07:17 on Jun 24, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2021 07:15
|
|
|
I'm not sure I understand that. It looks like if v1*v2 = c^2 then the denominator is 2, so (v1+v2)/2. But that doesn't jive at all to my layman brain's with the idea of v1+v2 collision between two objects travelling at light speed relative to each other, or a third object that launched itself off of either object toward the oncoming body. Why would the relative velocities be cut in half? It seems kind of arbitrary that just because they are approaching or past the speed of light relative to each other that different math is involved. And I'm not saying different math shouldn't be involved, I'm more curious if there's a certain point where it has to be. Where is that point?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2021 10:37
|
|
|
I don't think I understand this well enough to describe a situation like that. I'm just trying to understand it conceptually at all. But I'll try. If I have two ball bearings heading toward each other, one from from the left at 20mph and one from the right at 20mph, the energy of produced by their collision is equivalent to if one were standing still and the other was going 40mph, right? So the simple v1+v2 scenario. But at what point does that stop being true? Assume they're going 100mph each, or 10,000,000mph each, why do I need to bring c into the equation? How fast do they need to be going relative to each other for that original 20 + 20mph to not work? That's what I mean by arbitrary, is there a specific point where that kind of simple equation doesn't work and we need to bring c into the equation?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2021 11:29
|
|
|
Thanks got it! At least, I get the math part.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2021 20:43
|
|
|
Why bother opening the tab? He's already got it vented. Wasting valuable lovely beer by taking that extra couple seconds! Oh I see, he's stuck at the standard angle
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2021 08:19
|
|
|
Absent significant gravity, what even is a cliff?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2021 23:43
|
|
|
Those last 5 seconds are not played on the straw, looked very satisfying
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2022 05:44
|
|
|
Seems pretty tall to me
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2022 04:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 04:47 |
|
|
Uthor posted:Made me wonder: what would The Man put up as an anti-pogostick deterrents. Like, the stuff they put up for skateboarders wouldn't do poo poo. I would say ceilings but that might also benefit the homeless so it's kind of a non-starter
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2024 04:51
|
|