|
absolem posted:How the hell am I supposed to give it back to someone I don't even know existed? You're a young, white anarcho-capitalist that thinks 300+ million people currently occupying land they believe to legally own should be uprooted and forced out to satiate your dumb idea of fairness over poo poo that happened hundreds of years ago. Are you aware of the humanitarian crisis that would come from giving the land occupied by 300 million people back to less than 5% of that? What about tribes that stole land from other tribes? Who gets the Dakotas? The Sioux invaders or original tribes that lived there?
|
# ¿ May 23, 2014 00:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 08:38 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Look, we can resolve this historical contradiction with my conception of property rights in one of two ways: literal ethnic cleansing and the displacement of millions of now-destitute people; or raising taxes to fund social programs, education, and infrastructure for Native American communities. Sometimes I kind of feel like the Native Americans are playing the long game with their casinos. Eventually they're going to own a big chunk of what was stolen back anyway.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2014 01:05 |
|
Corvinus posted:This is so wrong that it's hilarious. Are you so far up your own rear end as to be blind, are you an autist, or is it a different failing of the human brain? Opinion is taught as fact depending on where you decided to go into debt for the rest of your life at.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2014 01:18 |