Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos
He said he's gonna stick around for 2018.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos
It's cool that Brazil shipped off 10 goals in their last two matches, I doubt any other semi finalist ever went out of the world cup in such a humiliating fashion, and they are the hosts to boot. Really incredible, and to think that ahead of this world cup most people thought Brazil had one of the best defenses in the world.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

vyelkin posted:

No one who knew anything about football thought a defence containing Marcelo, David Luiz, and Dani Alves would be one of the best in the world at preventing goals.

Marcelo had a really good year at Madrid, mostly offensively but he wasn't a defensive liability at any point, Alves hasn't had a good year but he was considered the best fullback in the world for like half a decade, people expected him to step up. And Luiz? well, yeah anyone who's seen him play knows he's a huge joker but he played in the best defense in the premier league this past season, and many people think he's some sort of prodigy.

And let us not forget Silva who pretty much everyone thinks is the best center back in the world alongside Kompany.

Yes right now it's easy to say they're all a bunch of jokers but ahead of the tournament it looked like a very solid line-up.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

vyelkin posted:

Alves and Marcelo are good defensively when they're in teams that compensate for their tendency to go pretend they're wingers. They have good defensive skills in that they can make tackles or interceptions when they have to, but their positioning and mentality has always been suspect because they are so attack-minded. They can be very effective players at the club level, when they have managers who surround them with good defensive players and adjust the team's strategy around the fact that Alves or Marcelo will be bombing forward at every opportunity. Scolari didn't do that. Instead he just let them both go attack all the time and didn't really bother drilling the team on how to defend when they're the ones under pressure.

And Luiz is a garbageman. He was in the best defence in the premier league this season because Mourinho managed his club and dropped Luiz to play Cahill and Terry instead (Luiz only played 19 times in the Premier League last season), and then sold Luiz the instant he found a team willing to pay for his reputation rather than his actual ability.

Thiago Silva is probably the best central defender in the world, but even he can't make up for three out of three defenders in the line alongside him being complete liabilities.

I know Luiz didn't start this year, I know he's a garbageman, I'm actually a chels fan. But basically read what you just said, you had 3/4 defenders with the potential to form a great defensive line up in the right system. When you look at the squad sheet before the tournament, or heck, before the germany match even, it would seem like a super solid defense, and indeed most pundits expected Brazil's defense (and midfield) to form a very solid foundation.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos
Not a single player in their defensive lineup plays in a club that plays 3-5-2 or any formation with wingbacks yet they're all great performers for their clubs (asides from Luiz). In fact, none of them actually play for a team that plays more than two defensive midfielders either. So... you're wrong?

The notion that a defensive line up consisting of Marcelo, Silva and Alves is weak and just cannot work competently and that this should be 'obvious to anyone who knows anything about football' is plain bullshit, it's a strong defensive line-up.

Marcelo and Alves both play in teams where their counterparts are also offensive fullbacks, so it's not like them playing on the same team is somehow not-workable at all.

Asides from the germans and maybe Italy, there wasn't a single team in this tournament that had a better defensive line-up, that Brazil's defense would perform so poorly was not a foregone conclusion before the semi-final.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

Healbot posted:

In other words: you must've missed the 10 goals Brazil conceded between the quarter-finals and now. Their defensive organization is built solely on Silva and Gustavo trying to create the illusion of four men at the back while the rest act as headless chicken.

I never said that they performed well.

In other words: Perhaps you should try reading a post if you're gonna respond to it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

vyelkin posted:

You're really missing the point of what I and others are saying. In their club sides, Alves, Marcelo, and Luiz get systems built around their tendencies to get forward, by surrounding them with other players who stay back and play more defensively. At Barcelona, for example, Alves and Alba both bomb forward so Busquets drops back in between the two centre backs and they push out wide to cover the space.

Their club sides have one, at most two defenders who get forward that much. At Barcelona, even when they have two (both fullbacks) getting forward, they have a midfielder drop back to make sure there's still adequate defensive cover. Absolutely none of their club sides have three out of four defender bombing forward on the attack. None of them. What you're essentially saying is "These three players do well for their clubs in systems where one or two defenders get forward, therefore you're wrong and no one could predict that they would do poorly in a system where three defenders get forward."

Clit Avoider has it absolutely right. All three playing the way they do with their club sides, either not told to be defensively disciplined by Scolari or ignoring him if they were told that, left one defender and one midfielder to play defence. Against Germany this was painfully exposed when Dante and Gustavo were unable to fill four or five defensive spots all on their own when Brazil were caught in possession with three out of four defenders up the pitch, and Germany had huge overlaps and attacking players in acres of space.

Nah I'm not, you're just analyzing the defensive line-up from a post-mortem perspective, quite obtusely tbqh.

If systems exist that can accommodate these players, and Brazil has the players to play those systems then it is -wrong- to say that anyone who looked at the players called up by scolari should have easily known that their defense would be farcical ahead of the tournament, which is exactly what you've said.

It's not like Brazil doesn't have any defensive midfielders who are capable of performing the same role Bosquets does.

We're not arguing whether brazil played like poo poo and defended in a comical fashion or not, we're arguing whether it was "obvious to anyone who knows anything about football" before the tournament. And the simple answer is that no, it wasn't.

Once again, I'm not saying Luiz is not a retard and personally I expected him to do make some defensive blunders which cost Brazil a few goals, and I alluded to him being a clown several times.

This is getting too boring and D&D-esque, the simple fact is that many people, including some who do know "poo poo" about football, thought that Brazil's defense was actually one if its better qualities. The majority of critique before they got smashed by the Germans was at the strikers Scolari chose to summon.

  • Locked thread