Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Slim Jim Pickens
Jan 16, 2012

emanresu tnuocca posted:

We're not arguing whether brazil played like poo poo and defended in a comical fashion or not, we're arguing whether it was "obvious to anyone who knows anything about football" before the tournament. And the simple answer is that no, it wasn't.

This is getting too boring and D&D-esque, the simple fact is that many people, including some who do know "poo poo" about football, thought that Brazil's defense was actually one if its better qualities. The majority of critique before they got smashed by the Germans was at the strikers Scolari chose to summon.

Everybody was focused on the bad strikers and didn't really consider how the attack-minded defense would affect the team when all of them went forward to support Jo/Hulk/Fred but they immediately gave the ball away.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread