Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
LloydDobler
Oct 15, 2005

You shared it with a dick.

Busta Chimes.wav posted:

How much credit should we give to directors for bringing a certain performance out of an actor? Even when not going to extremes, like Roman Polanski asking Mia Farrow to walk through traffic in Rosemary's Baby, direction has a large influence on how an actor plays a part. Is it even possible to separate the two?

I think the Star Wars prequels are the biggest argument in support of director/actor dependency. George Lucas managed to intentionally force crappy performances on an entire cast of powerhouse actors.

I mean, forget Black Swan, anyone who thinks Natalie Portman can't act needs to watch Hesher. Which is also an excellent example of understated transformation. She perfectly portrays the semi-smart but awkward uncared for girl with low self esteem. She can't even bring herself to ask for more hours at the food mart, just the exact opposite of assertive. She didn't get an Oscar nod for it but she probably should have.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread